Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for dimensional linear measurements in the mandible

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 593-599

  Halperin sternfeld, Michal ^a   Machtei, Eli E ^a,b   Horwitz, Jacob ^a,b  

^a Department of Periodontology School of Graduate Dentistry Rambam Health Care Campus   (Israel)

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

accuracy; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implants; Dimensional measurement; Ex vivo

Indexed keywords

GUTTA PERCHA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; MANDIBLE; RADIOGRAPHY; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; GUTTA-PERCHA; MANDIBLE; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 84904409850     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3409     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chen LC, Lundgren T, Hallstrom H, Cherel F. Comparison of different methods of assessing alveolar ridge dimensions prior to dental implant placement. J Periodontol 2008;79:401-405.
2. Behneke A, Burwinkel M, Behneke N. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:416-423.
3. Worthington P, Rubenstein J, Hatcher DC. The role of cone-beam computed tomography in the planning and placement of implants. J Am Dent Assoc 2010;141(suppl 3):19S-24S.
4. Lascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT-NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:291-294.
5. Loubele M, Guerrero ME, Jacobs R, Suetens P, van Steenberghe D. A comparison of jaw dimensional and quality assessments of bone characteristics with cone-beam CT, spiral tomography, and multislice spiral CT. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:446-454.
6. Misch KA, Yi ES, Sarment DP. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for periodontal defect measurements. J Periodontol 2006;77:1261-1266.
7. Mol A, Balasundaram A. In vitro cone beam computed tomography imaging of periodontal bone. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:319-
8. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:80-93.
9. Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J. Diagnostic validity (or acuity) of 2D CCD versus 3D CBCT-images for assessing periodontal breakdown. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:395-401.
10. Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: An in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:252-260.
11. Walter C, Kaner D, Berndt DC, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU. Threedimensional imaging as a pre-operative tool in decision making for furcation surgery. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:250-257.
12. Walter C, Weiger R, Zitzmann NU. Accuracy of three-dimensional imaging in assessing maxillary molar furcation involvement. J Clin Periodontol 2010;37:436-441.
13. Waltrick KB, de Abreu Jr MJ, Correa M, Zastrow MD, D'Avila Dutra V. Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: An in vitro study. J Periodontol 2013 Jan;84(1):68-77. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
14. Kottner J, Audige L, Brorson S, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol 2011 Jan;64:96-106.
15. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Group. Croat Med J 2003;44:639-650.
16. Berco M, Rigali PH Jr, Miner RM, DeLuca S, Anderson NK, Will LA. Accuracy and reliability of linear cephalometric measurements from cone-beam computed tomography scans of a dry human skull. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009;136:17.e11-19.
17. Hanold L, Vinson BE, Rubino A. Evaluating and improving your medication use system. In: Demichele Cousins D (ed). Medication Use: A Systems Approach to Reducing Errors, ed 2. Illinois: Joint Commission Resources, 1998:101.
18. Machtei EE, Schmidt M, Hausmann E, et al. Outcome variables in periodontal research: Means and threshold-based site changes. J Periodontol 2000;71:555-561.
19. Horwitz J, Zuabi O, Machtei EE. Accuracy of a computerized tomography-guided template-assisted implant placement system: An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1156-1162.
20. Buser D, von Arx T. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11(suppl 1):83-100.
21. Greenstein G, Tarnow D. The mental foramen and nerve: Clinical and anatomical factors related to dental implant placement: A literature review. J Periodontol 2006;77:1933-1943.