Power in practice: Negotiating the international intervention in Libya

European Journal of International Relations

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 889-911

  Adler Nissen, Rebecca ^a   Pouliot, Vincent ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Competence; diplomacy; emergence; Libya; power; practice theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904364083     PISSN: 13540661     EISSN: 14603713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1354066113512702     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adler E,Pouliot V.International practices.International Theory. 2011;3:1-36
2. Adler-Nissen R.Symbolic Power in European Diplomacy: The Struggle Between National Foreign Services and the EU’s External Action Service. Review of International Studies, FirstView Article. 2013;:1-25
3. Archer MSRealist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995
4. Baldwin DParadoxes of Power. New York: Basil Blackwell; 1989
5. Baldwin DHandbook of International Relations. (2013) Power and international relations. In: CarlsnaesWRisseTSimmonsBA (eds) Handbook of International Relations (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 273–297.Carlsnaes WRisse TSimmons BA, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2013:273-297.
6. Barnes BThe Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. Schatzki TRKnorr Cetina KVon Savigny E, ed. London: Routledge; 2001:25-35.
7. Barnett M,Duvall R.Power in international politics.International Organization. 2005;59:39-75
8. Bellamy AJ,Williams PD.The new politics of protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect.International Affairs. 2011;87:825-850
9. Bush R,Martiniello G,Mercer C.Humanitarian imperialism.Review of African Political Economy. 2011;38:357-365
10. Duvall R,Chowdhury AInternational Practices. Adler EPouliot V, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011:335-354.
11. Eagleton-Pierce MSymbolic Power in the World Trade Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013
12. Fearon JD.Bargaining, enforcement and international cooperation.International Organization. 1998;52:269-305
13. Fligstein N.Social skill and the theory of fields.Sociological Theory. 2001;19:105-125
14. Guzzini S.Structural power: The limits of neorealist power analysis.International Organization. 1993;47:443-478
15. Hopf T.The logic of habit in international relations.European Journal of International Relations. 2010;16:539-561
16. Keohane RO,Nye JSPower and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston, MA: Little & Brown; 1977
17. Krasner SDBack to Basics: State Power in a Contemporary World. Finnemore MGoldstein J, ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013:339-356.
18. Lewis P.Peter Berger and his critics: The significance of emergence.Society. 2010;47:207-213
19. Mérand F.Pierre Bourdieu and the birth of European defense.Security Studies. 2010;19:342-374
20. Neumann IB.Returning practice to the linguistic turn: The case of diplomacy.Millennium: Journal of International Studies. 2002;31:627-651
21. Nye JSBound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. New York: Basic Books; 1990
22. Nye JSSoft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York: Public Affairs; 2004
23. Pouliot V.The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities.International Organization. 2008;62:257-288
24. Pouliot VInternational Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO–Russia Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010
25. Reus-Smit CAmerican Power and World Order. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2004
26. Sawyer RK.Emergence in sociology: Contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory.American Journal of Sociology. 2001;107:551-585
27. Schelling TThe Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1980 [1960]
28. Voeten E.Outside options and the logic of Security Council action.American Political Science Review. 2001;95:845-858
29. Waltz KNTheory of International Politics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1979
30. Zartman IW,Rubin JZPower and Negotiation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 2002