Recovery of baker's yeast wastewater with membrane processes for agricultural irrigation purpose: Fouling characterization

Chemical Engineering Journal

Volumn 255, Issue , 2014, Pages 630-640

  Balcioǧlu, Gökhan ^a   Gönder, Z Beril ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Agricultural irrigation; Baker's yeast wastewater; Flux decline; Membrane processes; Recovery

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; IRRIGATION; MEMBRANE FOULING; RECOVERY; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER FILTRATION; WATER QUALITY;

AGRICULTURAL IRRIGATION; AGRICULTURAL IRRIGATION WATER; BAKER'S YEAST WASTEWATERS; BIOLOGICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; FLUX DECLINE; FOULING CHARACTERIZATION; MEMBRANE FOULING MECHANISMS; MEMBRANE PROCESS;

MEMBRANES;

EID: 84904333980     PISSN: 13858947     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2014.06.084     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), Review of world water resources by country, Water reports 23, Rome, Italy, 2003.
2. Alobaidy A., Al-Sameraiy M., Kadhem A., Majeed A. Evaluation of treated municipal wastewater quality for irrigation. J. Environ. Protect. 2010, 1:216-225.
3. Lubello C., Gori R., Nicese F., Ferrini F. Municipal-treated wastewater reuse for plant nurseries irrigation. Water Res. 2004, 38:2939-2947.
4. Lazarova V., Bahri A. Water Reuse for Irrigation: Agriculture Landscapes and Turf Grass 1995, CRS press, ISBN 1-87553-223-3.
5. Norton-Brandão D., Scherrenberg S.M., Van Lier J.B. Reclamation of used urban waters for irrigation purposes - a review of treatment technologies. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 122:85-98.
6. Lianga Z., Wang Y., Zhou Y., Liu H. Coagulation removal of melanoidins from biologically treated molasses wastewater using ferric chloride. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 152:88-94.
7. Kobya M., Delipinar S. Treatment of the baker's yeast wastewater by electrocoagulation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154:1133-1140.
8. Koyuncu I., Yalcin F., Ozturk I. Color removal of high strength paper and fermentation effluents with membrane technology. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 40:241-248.
9. Mutlu S.H., Yetis U., Gurkan T., Yilmaz L. Decolorization of wastewater of a baker's yeast plant by membrane processes. Water Res. 2002, 36:609-616.
10. Liu M., Zhu H., Dong B., Zheng Y., Yu S., Gao C. Submerged nanofiltration of biologically treated molasses fermentation wastewater for the removal of melanoidins. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 223:388-394.
11. Rahimpour A., Jahanshahi M., Peyravi M. Development of pilot scale nanofiltration system for yeast industry wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2014, 12(55):1-7.
12. Europäische norm, ISO 7887, Water quality examination and determination of color, Brussels, 1994.
13. APHA/AWWA/WEF Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington DC, USA, ISBN 0-87553-223-3, 1995.
14. Carrow R.N., Duncan R.R. Best management practices for saline and sodic turfgrass soils: assessment and reclamation 2012, CRC Press, Florida, ISBN 978-1-4398-1474-1: pp. 108-109.
15. Gönder Z.B., Arayici S., Barlas H. Advanced treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater by nanofiltration process: effects of operating conditions on membrane fouling. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2011, 76:292-302.
16. Liu M., Lü Z., Chen Z., Yu S., Gao C. Comparison of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes in the treatment of biologically treated textile effluent for water reuse. Desalination 2011, 281:372-378.
17. Zirehpour A., Jahanshahi M., Rahimpour A. Unique membrane process integration for olive oil mill wastewater purification. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 96:124-131.
18. Saha N.K., Joshi S.V. Performance evaluation of thin film composite polyamide nanofiltration membrane with variation in monomer type. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342:60-69.
19. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y., Leckie J.O. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes: II. Membrane physiochemical properties and their dependence on polyamide and coating layers. Desalination 2009, 242:168-182.
20. Jahanshahi M., Rahimpur A., Peyravi M. Developing thin film composite poly(piperazine-amide) and poly(vinyl-alcohol) nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2010, 257:129-136.
21. Li L., Zhang S., Zhang X. Preparation and characterization of poly(piperazineamide) composite nanofiltration membrane by interfacial polymerization of 3,3',5,5' biphenyl tetraacyl chloride and piperazine. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 335:133-139.
22. Hepsen R., Kaya Y. Optimization of membrane fouling using experimental design: an example from dairy wastewater treatment. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:16074-16084.
23. Rai U.K., Muthukrishnan M., Guha B.K. Tertiary treatment of distillery wastewater by nanofiltration. Desalination 2008, 230:70-78.
24. Ghaemi N., Madaeni S.S., Alizadeh A., Darei P., Vatanpour V., Falsafi M. Fabrication of cellulose acetate/sodium dodecyl sulfate nanofiltration membrane: characterization and performance in rejection of pesticides. Desalination 2012, 290:99-106.
25. Luo J., Wei S., Su Y., Chen X., Wan Y. Desalination and recovery of iminodiacetic acid (IDA) from its sodium chloride mixtures by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 342:35-41.
26. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34:3710-3716.
27. Gherasim C., Mikulášek P. Influence of operating variables on the removal of heavy metal ions from aqueous solutions by nanofiltration. Desalination 2014, 343:67-74.
28. Qi B., Luo J., Chen X., Hang X., Wan Y. Separation of furfural from monosaccharides by nanofiltration. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:7111-7118.
29. Gönder Z.B., Arayici S., Barlas H. Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater using utrafiltration process: optimization of the fouling and rejections. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51:6184-6195.
30. Wei X., Wang Z., Fan F., Wang J., Wang S. Advanced treatment of a complex pharmaceutical wastewater by nanofiltration: membrane foulant identification and cleaning. Desalination 2010, 251:167-175.
31. Buch P.R., Mohan D.J., Reddy A.V.R. Preparation, characterization and chlorine stability of aromatic-cycloaliphatic polyamide thin film composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 309:36-44.
32. Song W., Ravindran V., Koel B.E., Pirbazarii M. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter with H2O2/UV pretreatment: fouling mitigation and membrane surface characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 241:143-160.
33. Sari M.A., Chellam S. Surface water nanofiltration incorporating (electro) coagulation-microfiltration pretreatment: fouling control and membrane characterization. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 437:249-256.
34. Arkhangelsky E., Kuzmenko D., Gitis V. Impact of chemical cleaning on properties and functioning of polyethersulfone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 305:176-184.
35. Tang C.Y., Kwon Y., Leckie J.O. Effect of membrane chemistry and coating layer on physiochemical properties of thin film composite polyamide RO and NF membranes. FTIR and XPS characterization of polyamide and coating layer chemistry. Desalination 2009, 242:149-167.
36. Kang G.D., Gao C.J., Chen W.D., Jie X.M., Cao Y.M., Yuan Q. Study on hypochlorite degradation of aromatic polyamide reverse osmosis membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 300:165-171.
37. Turkish Republic Ministry of Environment and Urban Planning, water pollution control regulation directive for wastewater treatment plants, Official gazette dated March 20, 2010 and issued 27527.