Fabrication of cellulose acetate/sodium dodecyl sulfate nanofiltration membrane: Characterization and performance in rejection of pesticides

Desalination

Volumn 290, Issue , 2012, Pages 99-106

  Ghaemi, Negin ^a,b   Madaeni, Sayed S ^a   Alizadeh, Abdolhamid ^a   Daraei, Parisa ^a   Vatanpour, Vahid ^a   Falsafi, Monir ^a  

^a RAZI UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b KERMANSHAH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cellulose acetate membrane; Nanofiltration; Pesticide; SDS; Surfactant

Indexed keywords

AFM; CA MEMBRANES; CELLULOSE ACETATE MEMBRANE; CELLULOSE ACETATES; DODECYL SULFATE; EFFECT OF ADDITION; FT-IR-ATR; NITROPHENOLS; P-NITROPHENOL; PURE WATER; SDS; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; SOLUTION PH; US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; WATER CONTACT ANGLE; ZETA POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS;

ANIONIC SURFACTANTS; CELLULOSE; CONTACT ANGLE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; NANOFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES; PESTICIDE EFFECTS; PESTICIDES; PHENOLS; SODIUM; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; VOLATILE FATTY ACIDS; ZETA POTENTIAL;

SODIUM SULFATE;

ACETATE; CELLULOSE; DRINKING WATER; FTIR SPECTROSCOPY; MEMBRANE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; PESTICIDE; PH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SODIUM; SURFACTANT; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 84857802221     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2012.01.013     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Grosjean D. Atmospheric chemistry of toxic contaminants; reaction rates and atmospheric persistence. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1990, 40:1397-1402.
2. (ATSDR) Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 1992, Public Health Service, Atlanta, GA. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov.
3. Chanda A. Green catalyst destroys pesticides and munitions toxins. Science Daily 2005, http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/08/050829074515.htm.
4. Spain J.C., Hughes J.B., Knackmuss H.J. Biodegradation of Nitroaromatic Compounds and Explosives 2000, Lewis Publishers, New York.
5. Rea W.J., Liang H.C. Effects of Pesticides on the Immune System 1986, Environmental Health Center, Dallas, TX, USA. http://www.aehf.com/articles/A51.htm.
6. Schafer A.I. Natural Organics Removal using membranes, Principle, Performance and Cost 2001, Technomic Publishing Company, Inc., Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
7. Kiso Y., Kon T., Kitao T., Nishimura K. Rejection properties of alkyl phthalates with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 182:205-214.
8. Kiso Y., Sugiura Y., Kitao T., Nishimura K. Effects of hydrophobicity and molecular size on rejection of aromatic pesticides with nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 192:1-10.
9. Chen S.S., Taylor J.S., Mulford L.A., Norris C.D. Influences of molecular weight, molecular size, flux, and recovery for aromatic pesticide removal by nanofiltration membranes. Desalination 2004, 160:103-111.
10. Ahmad A.L., Tan L.S., Shukor S.R.Abd. The role of pH in nanofiltration of atrazine and dimethoate from aqueous solution. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154:633-638.
11. Benitez F.J., Acero J.L., Real F.J., Garcia C. Removal of phenyl-urea herbicides in ultrapure water by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration processes. Water Res. 2008, 1-10.
12. Schafer A.I., Fane A.G., Waite T.D. Nanofiltration: principles and applications. Elsevier Advanced Technology 2004.
13. Haddad R., Ferjani E., Roudesli M.S., Deratani A. Properties of cellulose acetate nanofiltration membranes. Application to brackish water desalination. Desalination 2004, 167:403-409.
14. Lv C., Su Y., Wang Y., Ma X., Sun Q., Jiang Z. Enhanced permeation performance of cellulose acetate ultrafiltration membrane by incorporation of Pluronic F127. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 294:68-74.
15. Arthanareeswaran G., Thanikaivelan P., Srinivasn K., Mohan D., Rajendran M. Synthesis, characterization and thermal studies on cellulose acetate membranes with additive. Eur. Polym. J. 2004, 40:2153-2159.
16. Sivakumar M., Mohan D.R., Rangarajan R. Studies on cellulose acetate-polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes II. Effect of additive concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 268:208-219.
17. Saljoughi E., Mohammadi T. Cellulose acetate (CA)/polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) blend asymmetric membranes: Preparation, morphology and performance. Desalination 2009, 249:850-854.
18. Sivakumar M., Malaisamy R., Sajitha C.J., Mohan D., Mohan V. Preaparation and performance of CA-PU blend membrane and their applications. II. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 169:215.
19. Mansourpanah Y., Madaeni S.S., Rahimpour A. Fabrication and development of interfacial polymerized thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane using different surfactants in organic phase; study of morphology and performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 343:219-228.
20. Yamasaki A., Tyagi R.K., Fouda A.E., Jonnason K., Matsuura T. Effect of SDS surfactant as an additive on the formation of asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation. Membrane Formation and Modification 2000, (Chapter 6). I. Pinnau, B.D. Freeman (Eds.).
21. Alsari A.M., Khulbe K.C., Matsuura T. The effect of sodium dodecyl sulfate solutions as gelation media on the formation of PES membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 188:279-293.
22. Tsai H.A., Li L.D., Lee K.R., Wang Y.C., Li C.L., Huang J., Lai J.Y. Effect of surfactant addition on the morphology and pervaporation performance of asymmetric polysulfone membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2000, 176:97-103.
23. Sivakumar M., Mohan D.R., Rangarajan R. Studies on cellulose acetate-polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes II. Effect of additive concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 268:208-219.
24. Matsuura T., Matsuura T., Matsuura M. Synthetic Membranes and Membrane Separation Processes 1993, CRC Press.
25. Kimura K., Amy G., Drewes J., Watanabe Y. Adsorption of hydrophobic compounds onto NF/RO membranes: an artifact leading to overestimation of rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 2003, 221:89-101.
26. Van der Bruggen B., Schaep J., Wilms D., Vandecasteele C. Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156:29-41.
27. Wang D.M., Lin F.C., Wu T.T., Lai J.Y. Formation mechanism of the macrovoids induced by surfactant additives. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 142:191.
28. Stuart B. Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Applications 2004, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
29. Zhao C.L., Holl Y., Pith T., Lambla M. FTIR-ATR spectroscopic determination of the distribution of surfactants in latex films. Colloid Polym. Sci. 1987, 265:823-829.
30. Hilal N., Al-Abri M., Al-Hinai H., Abu-Arabi M. Characterization and retention of NF membranes using PEG, HS and polyelectrolytes. Desalination 2008, 221:284-293.
31. Su-Hu W., Bing-zhi D., Yu H. Adsorption of bisphenol A by polysulphone membrane. Desalination 2010, 253:22-29.
32. Verliefde A.R.D., Cornelissen E.R., Heijman S.G.J., Verberk J.Q.J.C., Amy G.L., Van der Bruggen B., van Dijk J.C. The role of electrostatic interactions on the rejection of organic solutes in aqueous solutions with nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322:52-66.
33. Nghiem L.D., Schäfer A.I. Critical risk points of nanofiltration and reverse osmosis processes in water recycling applications. Desalination 2006, 187:303-312.
34. Ghaemi N., Madaeni S.S., De Nobili M., Alizadeh A. Ultrafiltration behavior of nitrophenols in the presence of humic substances. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 331:126-136.
35. Al-Abri M., Dakheel A., Tizaoui C., Hilal N. Combined humic substance and heavy metals coagulation, and membrane filtration under saline conditions. Desalination 2010, 253:46-50.
36. Hilal N., Al-Abri M., Al-Hinai H. Combined humic substance coagulation and membrane filtration under saline conditions. Desalin. Water Treat. 2009, 1:194-200.