|
Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 611-612
|
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: Resection or no resection? That is the question...
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CONSTIPATION;
EDITORIAL;
FECES INCONTINENCE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LAPAROSCOPIC RESECTION RECTOPEXY;
LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY;
LAPAROSCOPIC VENTRAL RECTOPEXY;
NERVE INJURY;
PATIENT SAFETY;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PROCTOPEXY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
RECTOCELE;
RECTUM PROLAPSE;
RECURRENCE RISK;
RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
SEXUAL FUNCTION;
SIGMOIDECTOMY;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
SURGICAL RISK;
ADVERSE EFFECTS;
COMPLICATION;
EUROPE;
FECAL INCONTINENCE;
FEMALE;
MALE;
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY;
PATIENT POSITIONING;
PROCEDURES;
RECTAL PROLAPSE;
RECTOSCOPY;
RECTUM;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
EUROPE;
FECAL INCONTINENCE;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES;
PATIENT POSITIONING;
PROCTOSCOPY;
RECTAL PROLAPSE;
RECTUM;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 84904327219
PISSN: 11236337
EISSN: 1128045X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-014-1161-9 Document Type: Editorial |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (11)
|