Consensus on ventral rectopexy: Report of a panel of experts

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 82-88

  Mercer Jones, M A ^a   D'Hoore, A ^b   Dixon, A R ^c   Lehur, P ^d   Lindsey, I ^e   Mellgren, A ^f   Stevenson, A R L ^g  

^a QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c FRENCHAY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d NANTES UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^e OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONSENSUS; DEFECOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSPAREUNIA; EXTERNAL RECTAL PROLAPSE; FECES IMPACTION; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNAL RECTAL PROLAPSE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; MALE SEXUAL DYSFUNCTION; MEDICAL DEVICE COMPLICATION; OSTEOMYELITIS; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT POSITIONING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCTOPEXY; RECTUM PERFORATION; RECTUM PROLAPSE; REOPERATION; SACRUM; SACRUM OSTEOMYELITIS; SOLITARY RECTAL ULCER SYNDROME; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SURGICAL MESH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); URINE RETENTION; VAGINAL INJURY; VAGINAL PERFORATION; VAGINAL VAULT PROLAPSE; VENTRAL RECTOPEXY;

DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FECAL INCONTINENCE; HUMANS; INTUSSUSCEPTION; PATIENT SELECTION; RECTAL DISEASES; RECTAL PROLAPSE;

EID: 84892872799     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12415     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Murphy M, Holzberg A, van Raalte H, Kohli N, Goldman HB, Lucente V. Time to rethink: an evidence-based response from pelvic surgeons to the FDA Safety Communication: "UPDATE on Serious Complications Associated with Transvaginal Placement of Surgical Mesh for Pelvic Organ Prolapse". Int Urogynecol J 2012; 23: 5-9.
2. Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ et al. PROSPER: a randomized comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 858-70.
3. D'Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F. Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2004; 91: 1500-5.
4. Nicholls RJ, Simson JN. Anteroposterior rectopexy in the treatment of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome without overt rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 222-4.
5. Speakman CT, Madden MV, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Lateral ligament division during rectopexy causes constipation but prevents recurrence: results of a prospective randomized study. Br J Surg 1991; 78: 1431-3.
6. Mollen RM, Kuijpers JH, van Hoek F. Effects of rectal mobilization and lateral ligaments division on colonic and anorectal function. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1283-7.
7. Bachoo P, Brazelli M, Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2): CD001758.
8. Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 504-14.
9. Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 63-73.
10. Orrom WJ, Mortensen NJ. Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 41-6.
11. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW et al. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut 1989; 30: 1737-49.
12. Mellgren A, Schultz I, Johansson C, Dolk A. Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 817-20.
13. Dvorkin LS, Gladman MA, Epstein J, Scott SM, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ. Rectal intussusception in symptomatic patients is different from that in asymptomatic volunteers. Br J Surg 2005; 92: 866-72.
14. Collinson R, Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse: short-term functional results. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 97-104.
15. Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 2007; 10: 138-43.
16. Collinson R, Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal rectal prolapse: short-term functional results. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 97-104.
17. Wahed S, Ahmad M, Mohiuddin K, Katory M, Mercer-Jones M. Short-term results for laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using biologic mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 1242-7.
18. Sileri P, Franceschilli L, de Luca E et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for internal prolapse using biological mesh: postoperative and short-term functional results. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16: 622-8.
19. Badrek-Amoundi AH, Roe T, Mabey K, Carter H, Mills A, Dixon AR. Laparosopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of solitary rectal ulcer syndrome: a cause for optimism? Colorectal Dis 2012; 15: 575-81.
20. Wong MTC, Abet E, Rigaud J, Frampas E, Lehur PA, Meurette G. Minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocele: impact on anorectal and sexual function. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 1193.
21. Vermeulen J, Lange JF, Sikkenk AC, van der Harst E. Anterolateral rectopexy for correction of rectocele leads to good anatomical but poor functional results. Tech Coloproctol 2005; 9: 35-41.
22. Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G et al. Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2010; 21: 1413-31.
23. Deprest J, De Ridder D, Roovers J-P, Werbrouck E, Coremans G, Claerhout F. Medium term outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with xenografts compared to synthetic grafts. J Urol 2009; 182: 2362-8.
24. Wijffels N, Cunningham C, Dixon A, Greenslade G, Lindsey I. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse is safe and effective in the elderly. Does this make perineal procedures obsolete? Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 561-6.
25. D'Hoore A, Vanbeckevoort D, Penninckx F. Clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of rectovaginal septum reinforcement with mesh for complex rectocele. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1264-72.
26. Smyth E, Sileri P, Jones O, Cunningham C, Urban J, Lindsey I. Patients with benign joint hypermobility and rectal prolapse: a complex subgroup of patients. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14(Suppl. 1): 35.
27. Powar M, Ogilvie J, Stevenson A. Day-case laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: an achievable reality. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 700-6.
28. Wong MT, Meurette G, Rigaud J, Regenet N, Lehur PA. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectopexy for complex rectocele: a prospective comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 342-6.
29. Mantoo S, Podevin J, Regenet N, Rigaud J, Lehur P-A, Meurette G. Is robotic-assisted ventral mesh rectopexy superior to laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the management of obstructed defaecation? Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: e469-75.
30. Propst K, Tunitsky-Bitton E, Schimpf MO, Ridgeway B. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis associated with sacral colpopexy and rectopexy: report of two cases and evaluation of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 2013; doi: 10.1007/s00192-013-2138-3
31. Armitage S, Seman EI, Keirse MJ. Use of Surgisis for treatment of anterior and posterior vaginal prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012; doi:10.1155/2012/376251.
32. De Boer TA, Gietelink DA, Hendricks JC, Vierhout ME. Factors influencing success of pelvic organ prolapse repair using porcine dermal implant Pelvicol. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010; 149: 112-6.
33. Hamoudi-Badrek A, Greenslade G, Dixon A. How to deal with complications after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR): lessons learnt from a tertiary referral centre. Colorectal Dis 2013; 15: 707-12.