Natural philosophy

The Cambridge History of Science: Early Modern Science

Volumn 3, Issue , 2006, Pages 365-406

  Blair, Ann ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904139270     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CHOL9780521572446.018     Document Type: Chapter

References (299)

1. Robert Boyle, Some Considerations Concerning the Usefulnesse of Experimental Natural Philosophy (Oxford: Printed by Henry Hall for Richard Davis, 1664).
2. Charles Frank, S.J., Philosophia naturalis (Freiburg: Herder, 1949).
3. Simon Schaffer, “Scientific Discoveries and the End of Natural Philosophy”, Social Studies of Science, 16 (1986), 387-420.
4. Sydney Ross, “Scientist: The Story of a Word”, Annals of Science, 18 (1962), 65-85.
5. oger Ariew and Alan Gabbey, “The Scholastic Back-ground”, in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, ed. Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 1: 425-53, esp. Pp. 427-8.
6. Aristotle, Metaphysics, 6.1.(1026a).
7. Pearl Kibre and Nancy Siraisi, “The Institutional Setting: The Universities”, in Science in the Middle Ages, ed. David Lindberg (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978), p. 131.
8. Katharine Park and Eckhard Kessler in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. Charles B. Schmitt, Quentin Skinner, and Eckhard Kessler, with Jill Kraye (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), pp. 453-534.
9. Edward Grant, Planets, Stars, and Orbs: The Medieval Cosmos, 1200-1687 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994), p. 20.
10. Maria Rosa di Simone, “Admission”, in A History of the University in Europe, vol. 2: Universities in Early Modern Europe (1500-1800), ed. Hilde De Ridder-Symoens (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 285-325, esp. P. 299.
11. Willem Frijhoff, “Patterns”, in De Ridder-Symoens, ed., Universities in Early Modern Europe, pp. 43-110, esp. P. 71.
12. Laurence Brockliss, French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987), pp. 19-26.
13. Hilde De Ridder-Symoens, “Mobility”, in De Ridder-Symoens, ed., Universities in Early Modern Europe, pp. 416-48, at p. 432.
14. Ellery Schalk, From Valor to Pedigree: Ideas of Nobility in France in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1986), chap. 8.
15. Garber and Ayers, eds., The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, pp. 9-32, esp. Pp. 16-17.
16. Charles B. Schmitt, Aristotle and the Renaissance (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1993), chap. 2.
17. Grant, Planets, Stars, and Orbs, pp. 21-3.
18. Jill Kraye, “The Philosophy of the Italian Renaissance”, in The Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Rationalism, ed. G. H. R. Parkinson (Routledge History of Philosophy, 4) (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 16-69, at pp. 24-5.
19. Charles Schmitt, “The Rise of the Philosophical Textbook”, in Schmitt, Skinner, and Kraye, eds., The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, pp. 792-804, esp. Pp. 796 ff.
20. Mary Richards Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth-Century Scholastic Textbooks”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Mo., 1962.
21. Domingo De Soto, Super octo libros physicorum Aristotelis (Venice: Franciscus Zilettus, 1582).
22. Franciscus Piccolomini, Librorum ad scientiam De natura attinentium partes quinque (Frankfurt: Wecheli haeredes, 1597).
23. Philip Melanchthon, Doctrinae physicae elementa (Lyon: Jean De Tournes and Gul. Gazeius, 1552).
24. Sachiko Kusukawa, The Transformation of Natural Philosophy: The Case of Philip Melanchthon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995), p. 174.
25. Guilelmus Adolphus Scribonius, Physica et sphaerica doctrina, 4th ed., with annotations by the English doctor Thomas Bright (Frankfurt: Palthenius, 1600), pp. 188-9.
26. Joseph Freedman, “Aristotle and the Content of Philosophy Instruction at the Central European Schools and Universities during the Reformation Era (1500-1650)”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 137 (1993), 213-53.
27. Joseph Freedman, “The Diffusion of the Writings of Petrus Ramus in Central Europe, c. 1570-1630”, Renaissance Quarterly, 46 (1993), 98-152.
28. Jean De Champaignac, Physique francoise (Bordeaux: S. Millanges, 1595).
29. Ann Blair, “La persistance du latin comme langue De science a la fin De la Renaissance”, in Sciences et langues en Europe, ed. Roger Chartier and Pietro Corsi (Paris: Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 1996), pp. 21-42, at p. 40.
30. Francois De Fougerolles, Le theatre De la nature universelle (Lyon: Pillehotte, 1597).
31. Ann Blair, The Theater of Nature: Jean Bodin and Renaissance Science (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997), pp. 205-6.
32. Ann Blair, “Authorship in the Popular ‘Problemata Aristotelis,’” Early Science and Medicine, 4 (1999), 1-39.
33. Blair, “The Problemata as a Natural Philosophical Genre”, in Natural Particulars: Nature and the Disciplines in Early Modern Europe, ed. Anthony Grafton and Nancy Siraisi (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1999), pp. 171-204.
34. Schmitt, Aristotle and the Renaissance, p. 54.
35. Edward Grant, “Medieval Departures from Aristotelian Natural Philosophy”, in Studies in Medieval Natural Philosophy, ed. Stefano Caroti (Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 1989), pp. 237-56, at p. 255.
36. Nancy Siraisi, Avicenna in Renaissance Italy: The Canon and Medical Teaching in Italian Universities after 1500 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1987), p. 177.
37. Francisco Valles, De iis quae scripta sunt physice in libris sacris, sive De sacra philosophia (Turin: Haeredes Nicolae Bevilacquae, 1587).
38. Jean Ceard, “Les transformations du genre du commentaire”, in l'Automne De la Renaissance, 1580-1630, ed. Jean Lafond and Andre Stegmann (Paris: J. Vrin, 1981), pp. 101-16.
39. Francois De Dainville, La geographie des humanistes (Paris: Beauchesne, 1940), pp. 222-3.
40. Edward Grant, “Aristotelianism and the Longevity of the Medieval World View”, History of Science, 16 (1978), 93-106.
41. Edward Grant, in A Source Book in Medieval Science, ed. Edward Grant (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1974), pp. 199-203, at p. 201.
42. Charles Lohr, “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors A-B”, Studies in the Renaissance, 21 (1974), 228-89, at p. 228.
43. Charles Lohr, “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors A-B”, and its sequels in Renaissance Quarterly, 28 (1975), 689-741 (“C”); 29 (1976), 714-45 (“D-F”); 30 (1977), 681-741.
44. Lohr, Latin Aristotle Commentaries (Florence: Olschki, 1998), vols. 2 and 3.
45. James Hankins, Plato in the Renaissance, 2 vols. (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1990), 2: 669-796.
46. Eckhard Kessler, “The Transformation of Aristotelianism”, in New Perspectives on Renaissance Thought: Essays in the History of Science, Education, and Philosophy, ed. John Henry and Sarah Hutton (London: Duckworth, 1990), pp. 137-47, at p. 146.
47. Schmitt, Aristotle and the Renaissance, p. 92.
48. John Murdoch, “From the Medieval to the Renaissance Aristotle”, New Perspectives on Renaissance Thought, pp. 163-76, at p. 167.
49. Christia Mercer, “The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelianism”, in The Rise of Modern Philosophy: The Tension between the New and Traditional Philosophies from Machiavelli to Leibniz, ed. Tom Sorell (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993), pp. 33-67, at pp. 45-6.
50. Jill Kraye, “The Philosophy of the Italian Renaissance”, pp. 26-37.
51. Hankins, Plato in the Renaissance.
52. James Hankins, “Marsilio Ficino as a Critic of Scholasticism”, Vivens Homo, 5 (1994), 325-34.
53. Brian Copenhaver, Symphorien Champierand the Reception of the Occultist Tradition in Renaissance France (The Hague: Mouton, 1978).
54. Christia Mercer, “Humanist Platonism in 17th Century Germany”, in Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy, ed. Jill Kraye and M. W. F. Stone (London: Routledge, 2000), pp. 238-58.
55. Alan Gabbey, “Philosophia Cartesiana Triumphata: Henry More (1646-71)”, in Problems of Cartesianism, ed. Thomas Lennon, John M. Nicholas, and John W. Davis (Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1982), pp. 171-249.
56. Kraye, “The Philosophy of the Italian Renaissance”, p. 47.
57. Frances Yates, Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964).
58. Robert Westman, “Magical Reform and Astronomical Reform: The Yates Thesis Reconsidered”, in Robert Westman and J. E. McGuire, Hermeticism and the Scientific Revolution (Los Angeles: The William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, 1977), pp. 3-91.
59. Brian Copenhaver, “Natural Magic, Hermetism, and Occultism in Early Modern Science”, in Reappraisals of the Scientific Revolution, ed. David Lindberg and Robert Westman (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 261-302.
60. Westman, “Magical Reform”, p. 30.
61. Judith V. Field, Kepler's Geometrical Cosmology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988).
62. Bruce Stephenson, The Music of the Heavens: Kepler's Harmonic Astronomy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994).
63. Job Kozhamthadam, The Discovery of Kepler's Laws: The Interaction of Science, Philosophy and Religion (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1994).
64. Charlotte Methuen, Kepler's Tubingen: Stimulus to a Theological Mathematics (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998), p. 222.
65. James Hankins, “Galileo, Ficino, and Renaissance Platonism”, in Kraye and Stone, eds., Humanism and Early Modern Philosophy, pp. 209-37.
66. Paolo Galluzzi, “Il ‘Platonismo’ del tardo Cinquecento e la filosofia di Galileo”, in Ricerche sulla cultura dell'Italia moderna, ed. Paola Zambelli (Bari: Laterza, 1973), pp. 39-79.
67. James Hankins, “Platonism, Renaissance”, in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward Craig, 10 vols. (London: Routledge, 1998), 7: 439-47, at p. 446.
68. Charles L. Stinger, Humanism and the Church Fathers: Ambrogio Traversari (1386-1439) and Christian Antiquity in the Italian Renaissance (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1977), p. 79.
69. Peter Barker, “Stoic Contributions to Early Modern Science”, in Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought, ed. Margaret Osler (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), pp. 135-54.
70. Alfonso Ingegno, “The New Philosophy of Nature”, in Schmitt, Skinner, and Kraye, eds., The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, pp. 236-63, esp. Pp. 247-63.
71. Paul O. Kristeller, Eight Philosophers of the Italian Renaissance (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1964).
72. Paul Richard Blum, Philosophenphilosophie: Und Schulphilosophie: Typen des Philosophierens in der Neuzeit (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1998).
73. Stuart Brown, “Renaissance Philosophy Outside Italy”, in Parkinson, ed., The Renaissance and Seventeenth-Century Rationalism, pp. 70-103, at p. 75.
74. Ian Maclean, “The Interpretation of Natural Signs: Cardano's De Subtilitate vs. Scaliger's Exercitationes”, in Occult and Scientific Mentalities in the Renais-sance, ed. Brian Vickers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), pp. 231-52.
75. Kristian Jensen, “Cardanus and His Readers in the Sixteenth Century”, and Ian Maclean, “Cardano and His Publishers, 1534-1663”, in Girolamo Cardano: Philosoph, Naturforscher, Arzt, ed. Eckhard Kessler (Wiesbaden: Harrossowitz, 1994).
76. Anthony Grafton, Cardano's Cosmos: The Worlds and Works of a Renais-sance Astrologer (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1999).
77. Nancy G. Siraisi, The Clock and the Mirror: Girolamo Cardano and Renaissance Medicine (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997).
78. Luigi Firpo, “The Flowering and Withering of Speculative Philosophy-Italian Philosophy and the Counter Reformation: The Condemnation of Francesco Patrizi”, in The Late Italian Renaissance, 1525-1630, ed. Eric Cochrane (London: Macmillan, 1970), pp. 266-86, at p. 278.
79. Luc Deitz, “Space, Light, and Soul in Francesco Patrizi's Nova De universis philosophia (1591)”, in Grafton and Siraisi, eds., Natural Particulars: Nature and the Disciplines in Renaissance Europe, pp. 139-69 and the literature cited therein.
80. D. P. Walker, Spiritual and Demonic Magic (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1975), pp. 189-92.
81. Martin Mulsow, Fruhneuzeitliche Selbsterhaltung: Telesio und die Naturphilosophie der Renaissance (Tubingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1998).
82. John M. Headley, Tommaso Campanella and the Transformation of the World (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997), pp. 162-3, 104 ff.
83. Walker, Spiritual and Demonic Magic, chap. 7.
84. Michel-Pierre Lerner, Tommaso Campanella en France au XVIIe siecle (Naples: Bibliopolis, 1995).
85. Hilary Gatti, Giordano Bruno and Renaissance Science (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999), esp. Chaps. 6-8.
86. Kraye, “The Philosophy of the Italian Renaissance”, pp. 49-50
87. Luigi Firpo, Il processo di Giordano Bruno, ed. Diego Quaglioni (Rome: Salerno, 1993).
88. John Bossy, Giordano Bruno and the Embassy Affair (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1991), esp. Pp. 179-80.
89. Michele Ciliberto, “Giordano Bruno tra mito e storia”, I Tatti Studies, 7 (1997), 175-90.
90. Charles B. Schmitt, “Aristotle as a Cuttlefish: The Origin and Development of a Renaissance Image”, Studies in the Renaissance, 12 (1965), 60-72.
91. Blair, The Theater of Nature, pp. 107-15.
92. Charles B. Schmitt, “Perennial Philosophy: From Agostino Steuco to Leibniz”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 27 (1966), 505-32.
93. Wilhelm Schmidt-Biggemann, Philosophia perennis: Historische Umrisse abendlandischer Spiritualitat in Antike, Mittelalter und Fruher Neuzeit (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1998).
94. Richard H. Popkin, The History of Scepticism from Erasmus to Spinoza, rev. Ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979).
95. Jose R. Maia Neto, “Academic Skepticism in Early Modern Philosophy”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 58 (1997), 199-220.
96. Zachary Sayre Schiffman, On the Threshold of Modernity: Relativism in the French Renaissance (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univer-sity Press, 1991).
97. Francisco Sanchez, That Nothing Is Known, ed. Elaine Limbrick, trans. Douglas Thomson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).
98. Agrippa von Nettesheim, Of the Vanitie and Uncertaintie of Artes and Sciences [first published in Latin, 1526], ed. Catherine Dunn (Northridge: California State University Press, 1974).
99. Petrarch, “On His Own Ignorance and That of Many Others”, trans. Hans Nachod, in The Renais-sance Philosophy of Man, ed. Ernst Cassirer, Paul Oskar Kristeller, and John Herman Randall, Jr., (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1948), p. 101.
100. J. M. M. H. Thijssen, “What Really Happened on 7 March 1277? Bishop Tempier's Condemnation and Its Institutional Context”, in Texts and Contexts in Ancient and Medieval Science: Studies on the Occasion of John E. Murdoch's Seventieth Birthday, ed. Edith Sylla and Michael McVaugh (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1997), pp. 84-105.
101. Stephen Menn, “The Intellectual Setting”, in Garber and Ayers, eds., The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, 1: 33-86.
102. John Murdoch, “The Analytic Character of Late Medieval Learning: Nat-ural Philosophy without Nature”, in Approaches to Nature in the Middle Ages, ed. Lawrence D. Roberts (Binghamton, N.Y.: Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, 1982), pp. 171-213, at p. 174.
103. Martin L. Pine, Pietro Pomponazzi: Radical Philosopher of the Renaissance (Padua: Editrice Antenore, 1986).
104. Kraye, “The Philosophy of the Italian Renaissance”, p. 42.
105. Antonino Poppi, ed., Cremonini e Galilei inquisiti a Padova nel 1604: Nuovi documenti d'archivio (Padua: Editrice Antenore, 1992).
106. Heinrich C. Kuhn, Venetischer Aristotelismus am Ende der aristotelischen Welt: Aspekte der Welt und des Denkens des Cesare Cremonini (1550-1631) (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1996).
107. Heinrich C. Kuhn, Cesare Cremonini (1550-1631): Il suo pensiero e il suo tempo (Documenti e Studi, 7) (Cento: Baraldi, 1990).
108. Charles Lohr, “Metaphysics”, in Schmitt, Skinner, and Kraye, eds., The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, pp. 537-638, esp. Pp. 614 ff.
109. Mercer, “The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelianism”, pp. 41-2.
110. Schmitt, Aristotle and the Renaissance, p. 11.
111. Heikki Mikkeli, An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the Nature of Arts and Sciences (Helsinki: SHS, 1992).
112. Daniel A. Di Liscia, Eckhard Kessler, and Charlotte Methuen, eds., Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature: The Aristotle Commentary Tradition (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1997).
113. Neal Ward Gilbert, Renaissance Concepts of Method (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960).
114. SLeonardo Taran, “Amicus Plato sed magis amica veritas: From Plato to Aristotle to Cervantes”, Antike und Abendland, 30 (1984), 93-124.
115. Henry Guerlac, “Amicus Plato and Other Friends”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 39 (1978), 627-33.
116. Martin L. Pine, Pietro Pomponazzi: Radical Philosopher of the Renaissance (Padua: Editrice Antenore, 1986).
117. Kraye, “The Philosophy of the Italian Renaissance”, p. 42.
118. Antonino Poppi, ed., Cremonini e Galilei inquisiti a Padova nel 1604: Nuovi documenti d'archivio (Padua: Editrice Antenore, 1992).
119. Heinrich C. Kuhn, Venetischer Aristotelismus am Ende der aristotelischen Welt: Aspekte der Welt und des Denkens des Cesare Cremonini (1550-1631) (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1996).
120. Charles Lohr, “Metaphysics”, in Schmitt, Skinner, and Kraye, eds., The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, pp. 537-638, esp. Pp. 614 ff.
121. Mercer, “The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelianism”, pp. 41-2.
122. Schmitt, Aristotle and the Renaissance, p. 11.
123. Heikki Mikkeli, An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the Nature of Arts and Sciences (Helsinki: SHS, 1992).
124. Neal Ward Gilbert, Renaissance Concepts of Method (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960).
125. Leonardo Taran, “Amicus Plato sed magis amica veritas: From Plato to Aristotle to Cervantes”, Antike und Abendland, 30 (1984), 93-124.
126. Henry Guerlac, “Amicus Plato and Other Friends”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 39 (1978), 627-33.
127. Charles H. Lohr, “The Sixteenth-Century Transformation of the Aristotelian Natural Philosophy”, in Aristotelismus und Renaissance: In memoriam Charles Schmitt, ed. Eckhard Kessler, Charles H. Lohr, and Walter Sparn (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1988), pp. 89-99, at pp. 90-1.
128. Kusukawa, The Transformation of Natural Philosophy, p. 175.
129. Charlotte Methuen, “The Teaching of Aristotle in Late Sixteenth-Century Tubingen”, in Philosophy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, ed. Constance Blackwell and Sachiko Kusukawa (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999), pp. 189-205.
130. Lambert Daneau, Physica Christiana (Geneva: Petrus Santandreanus, 1576).
131. Ann Blair, “Mosaic Physics and the Search for a Pious Natural Philosophy in the Late Renaissance”, Isis, 91 (2000), 32-58.
132. Olivier Fatio, Methode et theologie: Lambert Daneau et les debuts De la scolastique reformee (Geneva: Droz, 1976).
133. Max Engammare, “Tonnerre De Dieu et ‘courses d'exhalations encloses es nuees’: Controverses autour De la foudre et du tonnerre au soir De la Renaissance”, in Sciences et religions De Copernic a Galilee (1540-1610) (Rome: E cole Francaise De Rome, 1999), pp. 161-81.
134. Joseph Freedman, European Academic Philosophy in the Late Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries: The Life, Significance, and Philosophy of Clemens Timpler (1563/4-1624), 2 vols. (Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1988).
135. Freedman, European Academic Philosophy, 1: 276 and n. 180 at 2: 642.
136. Frans Titelmans, Compendium philosophiae naturalis [1542] (Paris: Michael De Roigny, 1582), p. 4.
137. Schmitt, “The Rise of the Philosophical Textbook”, pp. 795-6.
138. Michael Hunter and David Wootton, eds., Atheism from the Reformation to the Enlightenment (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).
139. Blair, Theater of Nature, pp. 26 and 147-8.
140. David B. Ruderman, Jewish Thought and Scientific Discovery in Early Modern Europe (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1995), esp. Chap. 2 and pp. 370-1.
141. Noah Efron, “Irenism and Natural Philosophy in Rudolfine Prague: The Case of David Gans”, Science in Context, 10 (1997), 627-49.
142. Andre Neher, Jewish Thought and the Scientific Revolution of the Sixteenth Century: David Gans (1541-1613) and His Times, trans. David Maisel (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).
143. Ruderman, Jewish Thought and Scientific Discovery, chap. 3.
144. David B. Ruderman, Kab-balah, Magic, and Science: The Cultural Universe of a Sixteenth-Century Jewish Physician (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988).
145. Isadore Twersky and Bernard Septimus, eds., Jewish Thought in the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1987).
146. David Ruderman and Giuseppe Veltri, eds., Cultural Intermediaries: Jewish Intellectuals in Early Modern Italy (Philadelphia: University Press, 2004).
147. E. G. R. Taylor, The Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor and Stuart England (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967).
148. Stillman Drake and I. E. Drabkin (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1969).
149. Bernard Palissy, Discours admirable des eaux et fontaines (Paris: M. Le Jeune, 1580).
150. Paolo Rossi, Philosophy, Technology, and the Arts in the Early Modern Era, ed. Benjmain Nelson, trans. Salvator Attanasio (New York: Harper and Row, 1970), pp. 1-4.
151. Robert Westman, “The Melanchthon Circle, Rheticus, and the Wittenberg Interpretation of the Copernican Theory”, Isis, 66 (1975), 165-93.
152. Ann Blair, “The Teaching of Natural Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Paris: The Case of Jean Cecile Frey”, History of Universities, 12 (1993), 95-158, at p. 126.
153. Paul Dibon, La philosophie neerlandaise au siecle d'or, vol. 1: L'Enseignement philosophique dans les universites a l'epoque precartesienne (1575-1650) (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1954), p. 234.
154. Laurence Brockliss, “Copernicus in the University: The French Experience”, in New Perspectives on Renaissance Thought: Essays in the History of Science, Education, and Philosophy, ed. John Henry and Sarah Hutton (London: Duckworth, 1990), pp. 190-213, esp. Pp. 191-7.
155. W. G. L. Randles, The Unmaking of the Medieval Christian Cosmos, 1500-1760: From Solid Heavens to Boundless Aether (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999), chaps. 7-8.
156. Pierre-Noel Mayaud, La condamnation des livres coperniciens et sa revocation a la lumiere De documents inedits (Rome: Editrice Pontificia, 1997).
157. Wolfgang Rother, “Zur Geschichte der Basler Universitatsphilosophie im 17. Jahrhundert”, History of Universities, 2 (1982), 153-191, at p. 169.
158. Richard Blackwell, Galileo, Bellarmine, and the Bible (Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991); and Gary
159. B. Deason, “John Wilkins and Galileo Galilei: Copernicanism and Biblical Interpretation in the Protestant and Catholic Traditions”, in Probing the Reformed Tradition: Historical Essays in Honor of Edward A. Dowey, Jr., ed. Elsie Anne McKee and Brian G. Armstrong (Louisville, Ky.: Westmin-ster/John Knox Press, 1989).
160. Ann Blair, “Tycho Brahe's Critique of Copernicus and the Copernican System”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 51 (1990), 355-77.
161. Roger Ariew, “The Theory of Comets at Paris, 1600-50”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 53 (1992), 355-72.
162. Roger Ariew, “Galileo's Lunar Observations in the Context of Medieval Lunar Theory”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 15 (1984), 213-26.
163. Gilbert Jacchaeus, Institutiones physicae, 1.4, 4th ed. (Schleusingen: Petrus Schmit, 1635), p. 13.
164. Reif, “Natural Philosophy in Some Early Seventeenth-Century Scholastic Textbooks”, p. 66.
165. Wilhelm Scribonius, Physica et sphaerica doctrina (Frankfurt: Palthenius, 1600), p. 189 ff.
166. Dainville, La geographie des humanistes, pp. 25-35.
167. Blair, “The Teaching of Natural Philosophy”, esp. Pp. 124-7.
168. Peter Dear, Discipline and Experience: The Mathematical Way in the Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995), chap. 2.
169. Stephen Pumfrey, “Neo-Aristotelianism and the Magnetic Philosophy”, in Henry and Hutton, eds., New Perspectives on Renaissance Thought, pp. 177-89, esp. P. 184.
170. Dear, Discipline and Experience, pp. 33-42.
171. Bailey, and Steven J. Harris (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1999).
172. Steven J. Harris, “Confession-Building, Long-Distance Networks, and the Organization of Jesuit Science”, Early Science and Medicine, 1 (1996), 287-318.
173. Rivka Feldhay, “Knowledge and Salvation in Jesuit Culture”, Science in Context, 1 (1987), 195-213.
174. Rivka Feldhay, Leiden University in the Seventeenth Century, ed. Th. H. Lunsing Scheurleer and G. H. M. Posthumus Meyjes (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1975).
175. Olaf Pedersen, “Tradition and Innovation”, in De Ridder-Symoens, ed., A History of the University in Europe, pp. 451-88, at p. 473.
176. Paula Findlen, Possessing Nature: Museums, Collecting, and Scientific Culture in Early Modern Italy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994), pp. 256-61.
177. Robert Merton, Science, Technology, and Society in Seventeenth Century England (Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press, 1970), p. 29.
178. Lesley B. Cormack, Charting an Empire: Geography at the English Universities, 1580-1620 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997), pp. 27.
179. Mordechai Feingold, The Mathematicians’ Apprenticeship: Science, Universities, and Society in England, 1560-1640 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).
180. John Gascoigne, Science, Politics, and Universities in Europe, 1600-1800 (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998).
181. ercer, “The Vitality and Importance of Early Modern Aristotelianism”, pp. 34-8.
182. Roger Ariew, “Descartes and Scholasticism: The Intellectual Background to Descartes’ Thought”, in The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, ed. John Cottingham (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), pp. 58-90, at pp. 64-5.
183. Roger Ariew, Descartes’ Meditations: Background Source Materials, ed. Roger Ariew, John Cottingham, and Tom Sorell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 256.
184. Brendan Dooley, “Social Control and the Italian Universities: From Renaissance to Illuminismo”, Journal of Modern History, 61 (1989), 205-39.
185. Edward Grant, “Ways to Interpret the Terms ‘Aristotelian’ and ‘Aristotelianism’ in Medieval and Renaissance Natural Philosophy”, History of Science, 25 (1987), 335-58.
186. Roger Ariew, “Aristotelianism in the Seventeenth Century”, in Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Edward Craig, vol. 1 (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 386-93, at p. 386.
187. Roger Ariew and Alan Gabbey, “The Scholastic Background”, in Garber and Ayers, eds., The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, pp. 429-32.
188. Theophraste Bouju, Corps De toute la philosophie divise en deux parties, vol. 1 (Paris: Charles Chastel-lain, 1614), ch. 18, pp. 405-8.
189. Roger Ariew, “Theory of Comets at Paris, 1600-1650”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 53 (1992), 355-72, at p. 360.
190. Ariew and Gabbey, “The Scholastic Background”, pp. 436, 438.
191. Siraisi, The Clock and the Mirror, pp. 56-8 and 138-42.
192. Ann Blair, “Tradition and Innovation in Early Modern Natural Philosophy: Jean Bodin and Jean-Cecile Frey”, Perspectives on Science, 2 (1994), 428-54.
193. Heinz Schott and Ilana Zinguer, eds., Paracelsus und seine internationale Rezeption in der Fruhen Neuzeit: Beitrage zur Geschichte des Paracelsismus (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1998).
194. Daniel Garber, “Defending Aristotle/Defending Society in Early Seventeenth-Century Paris”, in Wissenideale and Wissenkulturen in der Fruhen Neuzeit, ed. Claus Zittel and Wolfgang Detel (Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2002), pp. 135-60.
195. Jean-Baptiste Morin vividly describes the scene of the 1624 thesis defense before setting out to refute the theses himself in Refutation des theses erronees d'Anthoine Villon dit le soldat philosophe et Estienne De Claves medecin chimiste (Paris: Printed by the author, 1624).
196. Jean-Cecile Frey's Cribrum philosophorum [1628] as discussed in Blair, “Teaching Natural Philosophy in Early Seventeenth-Century Paris”, pp. 117-20.
197. Marin Mersenne, La verite des sciences, 1 [1625] (facsimile Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich From-mann Verlag, 1969), chap. 5, pp. 109-10.
198. Peter Dear, Mersenne and the Learning of the Schools (Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 1988).
199. P. J. S. Whitmore, The Order of Minims in 17th-Century France (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1967).
200. Joseph Vallesca, “Cursus aristotelicus”, MS 2521 (18th century).
201. Josephus Osset, “Philosophiae novo-antiquae institutiones”, MS 602 (1779).
202. Lohr, “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries, A-B”, p. 230.
203. William Eamon, Science and the Secrets of Nature: Books of Secrets in Medieval and Early Modern Culture (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1994), chap. 6.
204. Brendan Dooley, ed. Trans., Italy in the Baroque: Selected Readings (New York: Garland, 1995), pp. 23-37.
205. R. W. J. Evans, “Learned Societies in Germany in the 17th Century”, European Studies Review, 7 (1977), 129-52.
206. R. W. J. Evans, Der Akademiegedanke im 17. Und 18. Jahrhundert, ed. Fritz Hartmann and Rudolf Vierhaus (Bremen: Jacobi Verlag, 1977).
207. R. Winau, “Zur Fruhgeschichte der Academia Curiosorum”, pp. 117-38.
208. Pedersen, “Tradition and Innovation”, p. 484.
209. Ayval Ramati, “Harmony at a Distance: Leibniz's Scientific Academies”, Isis, 87 (1996), 430-52, esp. Pp. 449-51.
210. Hans-Stephan Brather, ed., Leibniz und seine Akademie: Ausgewahlte Quellen zur Geschichte der Berliner Sozietat der Wissenschaften, 1697-1716 (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1993).
211. Charles Webster, The Great Instauration: Science, Medicine, and Reform, 1626-60 (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1975).
212. Harcourt Brown, Scientific Organizations in Seventeenth-Century France, 1620-80 (New York: Russell and Russell, 1967).
213. Garber, “On the Front-Lines of the Scientific Counter-Revolution.”.
214. Howard M. Solomon, Public Welfare, Science, and Propaganda in Seventeenth-Century France: The Innovations of Theophraste Renaudot (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1972), pp. 72-3.
215. Simone Mazauric, Savoirs et philosophie a Paris dans la premiere moitie du XVIIe siecle: Les Conferences du Bureau d'Adresse De Theophraste Renaudot (1633-42) (Paris: Publications De la Sorbonne, 1997).
216. Adrien Baillet, La vie De Monsieur Descartes [1691], 1.14 (New York: Garland, 1987), pp. 160-5.
217. Pintard, Le libertinage erudit, pp. 42-3.
218. Christoph Luethy, “Thoughts and Circumstances of Sebastien Basson: Analysis, Micro-History, Questions”, in Early Science and Medicine, 2 (1997), 1-73.
219. Daniel Garber, John Henry, Lynn Joy, and Alan Gabbey, “New Doctrines of Body and Its Powers, Place, and Space”, in The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, 1: 553-623.
220. Stephen Clucas, “The Atomism of the Cavendish Circle: A Reappraisal”, The Seventeenth Century, 9 (1994), 247-73.
221. E. J. Dijksterhuis, The Mechanization of the World Picture, Pythagoras to Newton (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1961), 3.5.C: “The defection from Aristotelianism”, p. 282.
222. William R. Newman, Gehennical Fire: The Lives of George Starkey, an American Alchemist in the Scientific Revolution (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1994), esp. Pp. 20-32.
223. Clucas, “The Atomism of the Cavendish Circle”, pp. 251-2.
224. Walter Pagel, Paracelsus, 2nd ed. (Basel: Karger, 1982), p. 85.
225. Garber, Henry, Joy, and Gabbey, “New Doctrines of Body”, pp. 569-73.
226. Pierre Gassendi, Exercitationes paradoxicae adversus Aristoteleos [1624], ed. Trans. Bernard Rochot (Paris: J. Vrin, 1959).
227. Margaret Osler, “Baptizing Epicurean Atomism: Pierre Gassendi on the Immortality of the Soul”, in Religion, Science, and Worldview: Essays in Honor of Richard S. Westfall, ed. Margaret J. Osler and Paul Lawrence Farber (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985), pp. 163-84
228. Lynn Joy, Gassendi the Atomist: Advocate of History in an Age of Science (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).
229. Jean-Pierre Cavaille, “‘Le plus eloquent philosophe des derniers temps’: Les strategies d'auteur De Rene Descartes”, Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales, 2 (1994), 349-67.
230. Thomas Lennon, The Battle of Gods and Giants: The Legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655-1715 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993).
231. Laurence Brockliss, “Descartes, Gassendi, and the Reception of the Mechanical Philosophy in the French Colleges De Plein Exercice, 1640-1730”, Perspectives on Science, 3 (1995), 450-79.
232. Etienne Gilson, etudes sur le role De la pensee medievale dans la formation du systeme cartesien (Paris: J. Vrin, 1930).
233. Roger Ariew, Descartes and the Last Scholastics (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1999).
234. rian Copenhaver, “The Occultist Tradition and Its Critics”, in Garber and Ayers, eds., The Cambridge History of Seventeenth-Century Philosophy, 1: 485.
235. Dijksterhuis, The Mechanization of the World Picture, p. 408.
236. Descartes, Oeuvres De Descartes, ed. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery, 12 vols (Paris: Le Cerf, 1897-1910), 2: 460.
237. Genevieve Rodis-Lewis, “Descartes’ Life and the Development of His Philosophy”, in Cottingham, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, pp. 43 and 55.
238. Paul Dibon, “Der Cartesianismus in den Niederlanden”, in Die Philosophie des 17. Jahrhunderts, ed. Jean-Pierre Schobinger, 4 vols. (Basel: Schwabe, 1992), 2: 357-8.
239. Nicholas Jolley, “The Reception of Descartes’ philosophy”, in The Cambridge Companion to Descartes, p. 395.
240. Theo Verbeek, ed., La querelle d'Utrecht: Rene Descartes et Martin Schoock (Paris: Impressions Nouvelles, 1988).
241. Theo Verbeek, Descartes and the Dutch: Early Reactions to Cartesian Philosophy, 1637-1650 (Carbon-dale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1992), pp. 85-6.
242. Rienk Vermij, The Calvinist Copernicans: The Reception of the New Astronomy in the Dutch Republic 1575-1750 (Amsterdam: Koninklijke Nederlanse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 2002).
243. Roger Ariew, “Damned If You Do: Cartesians and Censorship, 1663-1706”, Perspectives on Science, 2 (1994), 255-74.
244. Tad Schmalz, “What Has Cartesianism to Do with Jansenism?” Journal of the History of Ideas, 60 (1999), 37-56.
245. Brockliss, “Descartes, Gassendi, and the Reception of the Mechanical Philosophy”, p. 473.
246. P. Mouy, Le developpement De la physique cartesienne, 1646-1712 (Paris: J. Vrin, 1934), esp. Pp. 108-16.
247. G. Vanpaemel, “Rohault's ‘Traite De physique’ and the Teaching of Cartesian Physics”, Janus, 71 (1984), 31-40.
248. Michael Heyd, Between Orthodoxy and the Enlightenment: Jean-Robert Chouet and the Introduction of Cartesian Science in the Academy of Geneva (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982), pp. 116-17.
249. Roger Ariew and Marjorie Grene, “The Cartesian Destiny of Form and Matter”, Early Science and Medicine, 2 (1997), 302-25, at pp. 321-2.
250. Brockliss, “Descartes, Gassendi, and the Reception of the Mechanical Philosophy”, p. 469.
251. Dennis Des Chene, Physiologia: Natural Philosophy in Late Aristotelian and Cartesian Thought (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1996).
252. Francesco Trevisani, Descartes in Germania: La ricezione del cartesianesimo nella facolta filosofica e medica di Duisburg (1652-1703) (Milan: Franco Angeli, 1992), p. 13.
253. Claudio Manzoni, I cartesiani italiani (1660-1760) (Udine: La Nuova Base, 1984); Mario Agrimi, “Descartes nella Napoli di fine Seicento”, in Descartes: Il Metodo e i Saggi (Atti del Convegno per il 350 anniversario della pubblicazione del Discours De la methode e degli Essais), ed. Giulia Belgioioso, Guido Cimino, Pierre Costabel and Giovanni Papuli, 2 vols. (Florence: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, 1990), 2: 545-86.
254. Mario Agrimi, “Descartes nella Napoli di fine Seicento”, in Descartes: Il Metodo e i Saggi (Atti del Convegno per il 350 anniversario della pubblicazione del Discours De la methode e degli Essais), ed. Giulia Belgioioso, Guido Cimino, Pierre Costabel and Giovanni Papuli, 2 vols. (Florence: Istituto della Enciclopedia Italiana, 1990), 2: 545-86
255. Giulia Belgioioso, Cultura a Napoli e cartesianesimo: Scritti su G. Gimma, P. M. Doria, C. Cominale (Galatina: Congedo Editore, 1992).
256. Brockliss, “Descartes, Gassendi and the Reception of the Mechanical Philosophy”, p. 464.
257. Robert Hugh Kargon, Atomism in England from Hariot to Newton (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1966), pp. 63 and 69.
258. Steven Shapin and Simon Schaffer, Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985).
259. Julian Martin, Francis Bacon, the State, and the Reform of Natural Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
260. Lisa Jardine and Alan Steward, Hostage to Fortune: The Troubled Life of Francis Bacon (London: Victor Gollancz, 1998), pp. 502-11.
261. Antonio Perez-Ramos, Francis Bacon's Idea of Science and the Maker's Knowledge Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).
262. Markku Peltonen, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Bacon (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).
263. Steven Shapin, The Scientific Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), pp. 80-96.
264. Christoph Meinel, “Early Seventeenth-Century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology, and the Insufficiency of Experiment”, Isis, 79 (1988), 68-103.
265. Jan Wojcik, Robert Boyle and the Limits of Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
266. Rose-Mary Sargent, The Diffident Naturalist: Robert Boyle and the Philosophy of Experiment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
267. Steven Shapin, A Social History of Truth: Civility and Science in Seventeenth-Century England (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), chaps. 4 and 7.
268. Stillman Drake, Galileo at Work: His Scientific Biography (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978).
269. William Shea, Galileo's Intellectual Revolution (London: Macmillan, 1972).
270. Michael Segre, In the Wake of Galileo (New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1991).
271. I. B. Cohen, The Birth of a New Physics, rev. Ed. (New York: W. W. Norton, 1985).
272. Bruce Stephenson, Kepler's Physical Astronomy (New York: Springer, 1987).
273. R. W. J. Evans, Rudolf II and His World: A Study in Intellectual History, 1576-1612 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973).
274. Mario Biagioli, Galileo, Courtier: The Practice of Science in the Culture of Absolutism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993).
275. Robert Westman, “The Astronomer's Role in the Sixteenth Century: A Preliminary Study”, History of Science, 18 (1980), 105-47.
276. Richard Westfall, Never at Rest: A Biography of Isaac Newton (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980), p. 210.
277. John Fauvel, Raymond Flood, Michael Shortland, and Robin Wilson, eds., Let Newton Be! (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).
278. Isaac Newton, “General Scholium”, in Newton: Texts, Backgrounds, Commentaries, ed. I. Bernard Cohen and Richard Westfall (New York: W. W. Norton, 1995), pp. 339-42, at p. 342.
279. Betty Jo Teeter Dobbs, The Janus Faces of Genius: The Role of Alchemy in Newton's Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).
280. James E. Force and Richard Popkin, eds., Essays on the Context, Nature, and Influence of Isaac Newton's Theology (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1990).
281. Betty Jo Dobbs, “Newton as Final Cause and First Mover”, Isis, 85 (1994), 633-43.
282. SAndrew Cunningham, “How the Principia Got Its Name; or, Taking Natural Philosophy Seriously”, History of Science, 29 (1991), 377-92, at p. 384.
283. Robin Briggs, “The Academie Royale des Sciences and the Pursuit of Utility”, Past and Present, 131 (1991), 38-88.
284. Michele LeDoeuff, “Bacon chez les grands au siecle De Louis XIII”, in Francis Bacon: Terminologia e fortuna nel XVII secolo, ed. Marta Fattori (Seminario Internazionale, Rome, 11-13 March 1984) (Rome: Edizioni dell'Ateneo, 1984), pp. 155-78.
285. Michael Hunter, The Royal Society and Its Fellows, 1660-1700: The Morphology of an Early Scientific Institution (Oxford: British Society for the History of Science, 1994), chap. 1.
286. Pedersen, “Tradition and Innovation”, p. 484.
287. Roger Hahn, The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution: The Paris Academy of Sciences, 1666-1803 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1971).
288. David J. Sturdy, Science and Social Status: The Members of the Academie des Sciences, 1666-1750 (Woodbridge: Boydell Press, 1995).
289. Alice Stroup, A Company of Scientists: Botany, Patronage, and Community at the Seventeenth-Century Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).
290. Peter Dear, “Totius in Verba: Rhetoric and Authority in the Early Royal Society”, Isis, 76 (1985), 145-61.
291. Shapin, A Social History of Truth, pp. 308-9.
292. Contrast Hunter, The Royal Society and Its Fellows, p. 10.
293. Hahn, The Anatomy of a Scientific Institution, p. 59.
294. I. Bernard Cohen, Revolution in Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1985), p. 325.
295. Larry Stewart, The Rise of Public Science: Rhetoric, Technology, and Natural Philosophy in Newtonian Britain, 1660-1750 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).
296. Johann Heinrich Alsted, Encyclopedia, vol. 2 (Herborn, 1630; facsimile Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1989).
297. Howard Hotson, Johann Heinrich Alsted (1588-1638): Between Renaissance, Reformation, and Universal Reform (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000), pp. 223-4.
298. John Harris, Lexicon technicum (London: Dan Brown [and 9 others], 1704), “physiology.”.
299. John Keill, Introductio ad veram physicam (Oxford: Sheldonian Theatre, at the expense of Thomas Bennet, 1702).