A user-operated test of suprathreshold acuity in noise for adult hearing screening: The SUN (SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN NOISE) test

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 52, Issue , 2014, Pages 66-72

  Paglialonga, Alessia ^a   Tognola, Gabriella ^a   Grandori, Ferdinando ^a  

^a CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adult hearing screening (AHS); Adults; Elderly; Speech recognition; Speech understanding; Speech in noise; Suprathreshold acuity in noise

Indexed keywords

LINGUISTICS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH RECOGNITION; TOUCH SCREENS;

ADULTS; ELDERLY; HEARING SCREENING; SPEECH IN NOISE; SPEECH UNDERSTANDING; SUPRATHRESHOLD;

AUDITION;

ADULT HEARING SCREENING; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SCREENING; CONSONANT; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH UNDERSTANDING IN NOISE TEST; VOWEL; ADULT; HEARING; HEARING TEST; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD;

ADULT; HEARING; HEARING TESTS; HUMANS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 84904125449     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: 18790534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. World Health Organization and World Bank. World report on disability. WHO press, Geneve, Switzerland, 2011, vol. 295, p. 298. Available from: (last accessed 30.06.14). http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2011/9789240685215_eng.pdf.
2. Davis A., Smith P., Ferguson M., Stephens D., Gianopoulos I. Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technol. Assess. 2007, 11:1-294.
3. Grandori F., Parazzini M., Tognola G., Paglialonga A. Hearing Screening in Adults and Elderly is Gaining Momentum. Hearing Care for Adults: The Challenge of Aging 2009, 191-202. Phonak press, Chicago. L. Hickson (Ed.).
4. Morris A.E., Lutman M.E., Cook A.J., Turner D. An economic evaluation of screening 60- to 70-year-old adults for hearing loss. J. Public Health (Oxf.) 2013, 35:139-146.
5. Arlinger S. Negative consequences of uncorrected hearing loss - a review. Int. J. Audiol. 2003, 42(Suppl. 2). (2S17-2S20).
6. Nachtegaal J., Smit J.H., Smits C., Bezemer P.D., van Beek J.H., Festen J.M., Kramer S.E. The association between hearing status and psychosocial health before the age of 70 years: results from an internet-based national survey on hearing. Ear Hear. 2009, 30:302-312.
7. Lin F.R., Yaffe K., Xia J., Xue Q.L., Harris T.B., Purchase-Helzner E., Satterfield S., Ayonayon H.N., Ferrucci L., Simonsick E.M. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern. Med. 2013, 173:293-299.
8. Davis A., Smith P. Adult hearing screening: health policy issues - what happens next?. Am. J. Audiol. 2013, 22:167-170.
9. Kemp D.T. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Br. Med. Bull. 2002, 63:223-224.
10. Nelson H.D., Bougatsos C., Nygren P. Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics 2008, 122(1):e266-e276.
11. Yueh B., Shapiro N., MacLean C.H., Shekelle P.G. Screening and management of adult hearing loss in primary care: scientific review. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2003, 289:1976-1985.
12. Weinstein B.E. Validity of a screening protocol identifying elderly people with hearing problems. Am. Speech Hear. Assoc. 1986, 28:41-45.
13. Zokoll M.A., Wagener K.C., Brand T., Buschermöhle M., Kollmeier B. Internationally comparable screening tests for listening in noise in several European languages: the German digit triplet test as an optimization prototype. Int. J. Audiol. 2012, 51:697-707.
14. Schow R.L. Considerations in selecting and validating an adult/elderly hearing screening protocol. Ear Hear. 1991, 12:337-348.
15. Kiessling J., Pichora-Fuller M.K., Gatehouse S., Stephens D., Arlinger S., Chisolm T., Davis A.C., Erber N.P., Hickson L., Holmes A., Rosenhall U., von Wedel H. Candidature for and delivery of audiological services: special needs of older people. Int. J. Audiol. 2003, 42(Suppl. 2). (2S92-2S101).
16. Knudsen L.V., Oberg M., Nielsen C., Naylor G., Kramer S.E. Factors influencing help seeking, hearing aid uptake, hearing aid use and satisfaction with hearing aids: a review of the literature. Trends Amplif. 2010, 14:127-154.
17. Laplante-Lévesque A., Hickson L., Worrall L. Predictors of rehabilitation intervention decisions in adults with acquired hearing impairment. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2011, 54:1385-1399.
18. Humes L.E., Dubno J.R., Gordon-Salant S., Lister J.J., Cacace A.T., Cruickshanks K.J., Gates G.A., Wilson R.H., Wingfield A. Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2012, 23:635-666.
19. Humes L.E. Understanding the speech-understanding problems of older adults. Am. J. Audiol. 2013, 22:303-305.
20. Killion M.C., Niquette P.A. What can the pure-tone audiogram tell us about a patient[U+05F3]s SNR loss?. Hear. J. 2000, 53:46-53.
21. Lutman M.E. Speech Tests in Quiet and Noise as a Measure of Auditory Processing. Speech Audiometry 1997, 63-73. Whurr Publishers Ltd., London. 2nd ed. M. Martin (Ed.).
22. Paglialonga A., Grandori F., Tognola G. Using the SUN test (Speech Understanding in Noise) for adult hearing screening. Am. J. Audiol. 2013, 22:171-174.
23. Grandori F., Tognola G., Paglialonga A. A novel approach for adult hearing screening. Audiol. Neurotol. 2012, 17(Suppl. 1):S12-S14.
24. Paglialonga A., Tognola G., Grandori F. SUN-test (Speech Understanding in Noise): a method for hearing disability screening. Audiol. Res. 2011, 1:49-54.
25. Paglialonga A., Tognola G., Grandori F. Pilot initiatives of adult hearing screening in Italy. Audiol. Res. 2011, 1:64-68.
26. N. Vaez, L. Desgualdo-Pereira, A. Paglialonga, Development of a test of suprathreshold acuity in noise in Brazilian Portuguese: a new method for hearing screening and surveillance, Biomed. Res. Int., 2014 (Special Issue "Preventing Hearing Loss and Restoring Hearing: A New Outlook"), (in press).
27. Humes L.E., Dubno J.R. Factors Affecting Speech Understanding in Older Adults. The Aging Auditory System 2010, 211-257. Springer, New York. S. Gordon-Salant, R.D. Frisina, A.N. Popper, R.R. Fay (Eds.).
28. Gordon-Salant S. Hearing loss and aging: new research findings and clinical implications. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2005, 42(Suppl. 2):S9-S24.
29. Leensen M.C., Dreschler W.A. The applicability of a speech-in-noise screening test in occupational hearing conservation. Int. J. Audiol. 2013, 52:455-465.
30. Watson C.S., Kidd G.R., Miller J.D., Smits C., Humes L.E. Telephone screening tests for functionally impaired hearing: current use in seven countries and development of a US version. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 2012, 23:757-767.
31. Smits C., Kapteyn T.S., Houtgast T. Development and validation of an automatic speech-in-noise screening test by telephone. Int. J. Audiol. 2004, 43:15-28.
32. Dubno J.R., Dirks D.D. Evaluation of hearing-impaired listeners using a Nonsense Syllable Test. I. Test reliability. J. Speech Hear. Res. 1982, 25:135-141.
33. Loizou P.C., Poroy O., Dorman M. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108:790-802.
34. Vickers D.A., Moore B.C., Baer T. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2001, 110:1164-1175.
35. Cooke M., Lecumberri M.L.G., Scharenborg O., Van Dommelen W.A. Language-independent processing in speech perception: identification of English intervocalic consonants by speakers of eight European languages. Speech Commun. 2010, 52:954-967.
36. Akeroyd M.A. Are individual differences in speech reception related to individual differences in cognitive ability? A survey of twenty experimental studies with normal and hearing-impaired adults. Int. J. Audiol. 2008, 47(Suppl. 2):S53-S71.
37. van Rooij J.C., Plomp R. Auditive and cognitive factors in speech perception by elderly listeners. Acta Oto-laryngol 1990, 476(Suppl.):S177-S181.
38. Acoustics - Audiometric test methods - Part 3: Speech audiometry, ISO Standard 8253-3:1996(E).
39. Audiometria Vocale 2000, vol. I. GN ReSound, Montegrotto, Italy.
40. Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S., Wilbraham K., Cox R., et al. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1994, 96:2108-2120.
41. Leek M.R. Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percept. Psychophys. 2001, 63:1279-1292.
42. Assmann P., Summerfield Q. The Perception of Speech Under Adverse Conditions. Speech Processing in the Auditory System 2004, 231-308. Springer, New York. S. Greenberg, W. Ainsworth, W. Popper, R. Fay (Eds.).
43. Hirsh I.J., Reynolds E.G., Joseph M. Intelligibility of different speech materials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1954, 26:530-537.
44. Prosser S., Turrini M., Arslan E. Effects of different noises on speech discrimination by the elderly. Acta Oto-laryngol. 1991, 476(Suppl.):S136-S142.
45. Strasburger H. Converting between measures of slope of the psychometric function. Percept. Psychophys. 2001, 63:1348-1355.
46. Cutugno F., Prosser S., Turrini M. Speech Audiometry [Audiometria vocale] 2010, GN ReSound, Montegrotto, Italy.
47. Versfeld N.J., Daalder L., Festen J.M., Houtgast T. Method for the selection of sentence materials for efficient measurement of the speech reception threshold. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 107:1671-1684.
48. Acoustics - Statistical distribution of hearing thresholds as a function of age, ISO Standard 7029:2000.
49. Acoustics - Audiometric test methods - Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. ISO Standard 8253-1:1989.
50. Frank T., Petersen D.R. Accuracy of a 40dB HL Audioscope and audiometer screening for adults. Ear Hear. 1987, 8:180-183.
51. Ventry I.M., Weinstein B.E. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. Am. Speech Hear. Assoc. 1983, 25:37-42.
52. McBride W.S., Mulrow C.D., Aguilar C., Tuley M.R. Methods for screening for hearing loss in older adults. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1994, 307:40-42.
53. World Health Organization, Grades of hearing impairment, Available from: (last accessed 30.06.14). http://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/hearing_impairment_grades/en/.
54. Audiometers - Part 2: Equipment for speech audiometry. EN Standard 60645-2:1997.
55. Zurek P.M., Delhorne L.A. Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1987, 82:1548-1559.
56. Wilson R.H., McArdle R. Speech signals used to evaluate functional status of the auditory system. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2005, 42:79-94.