Development of a cell-based assay for the detection of anti-aquaporin 1 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

Journal of Neuroimmunology

Volumn 273, Issue 1-2, 2014, Pages 103-110

  Long, Youming ^a   Zheng, Yangbo ^a   Shan, Fulan ^a   Chen, Mengyu ^a   Fan, Yongxiang ^a   Zhang, Bin ^a   Gao, Cong ^a   Gao, Qingchun ^a   Yang, Ning ^a  

^a GUANGZHOU MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Aquaporin 1 antibody; Cell based assay; Multiple sclerosis; Neuromyelitis optica

Indexed keywords

AQUAPORIN 1 ANTIBODY; AQUAPORIN 4 ANTIBODY; PROTEIN ANTIBODY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTIBODY BLOOD LEVEL; ANTIBODY DETECTION; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; AQP1 GENE; ARTICLE; BRAIN INFARCTION; CELL ASSAY; CELL BASED ASSAY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM INFECTION; CHINESE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GENE; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE; LONGITUDINALLY EXTENSIVE TRANSVERSE MYELITIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; MYELOOPTIC NEUROPATHY; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NONHUMAN; OPTIC NEURITIS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RECURRENT OPTIC NEURITIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WESTERN BLOTTING;

AQUAPORIN 1 ANTIBODY; CELL-BASED ASSAY; MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS; NEUROMYELITIS OPTICA;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTIBODIES; AQUAPORIN 1; AQUAPORIN 4; BRAIN; CHILD; FEMALE; HEK293 CELLS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMYELITIS OPTICA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TRANSFECTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84904101377     PISSN: 01655728     EISSN: 18728421     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anon. Proposed diagnostic criteria and nosology of acute transverse myelitis. Neurology 2002, 59(4):499-505.
2. Fazio R., Malosio M.L., Lampasona V., et al. Antiacquaporin 4 antibodies detection by different techniques in neuromyelitis optica patients. Mult. Scler. 2009, 15(10):1153-1163.
3. Fujihara K., Sato D.K. AQP4 antibody serostatus: is its luster being lost in the management and pathogenesis of NMO. Neurology 2013, 81(14):1186-1188.
4. Gao J., Yu H., Song Q., Li X. Establishment of HEK293 cell line expressing green fluorescent protein-aquaporin-1 to determine osmotic water permeability. Anal. Biochem. 2005, 342(1):53-58.
5. Jarius S., Wildemann B. Aquaporin-4 antibodies (NMO-IgG) as a serological marker of neuromyelitis optica: a critical review of the literature. Brain Pathol. 2013, 23(6):661-683.
6. Jarius S., Paul F., Franciotta D., et al. Mechanisms of disease: aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica. Nat. Clin. Pract. Neurol. 2008, 4(4):202-214.
7. Kinoshita M., Nakatsuji Y., Kimura T., et al. Neuromyelitis optica: passive transfer to rats by human immunoglobulin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 386(4):623-627.
8. Kitley J., Woodhall M., Waters P., et al. Myelin-oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies in adults with a neuromyelitis optica phenotype. Neurology 2012, 79(12):1273-1277.
9. Kurtzke J.F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983, 33(11):1444-1452.
10. Lennon V.A., Wingerchuk D.M., Kryzer T.J., et al. A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004, 364(9451):2106-2112.
11. Lennon V.A., Kryzer T.J., Pittock S.J., Verkman A.S., Hinson S.R. IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202(4):473-477.
12. Long Y., Qiu W., Lu Z., et al. Aquaporin 4 antibodies in the cerebrospinal fluid are helpful in diagnosing Chinese patients with neuromyelitis optica. Neuroimmunomodulation 2012, 19(2):96-102.
13. Long Y., Gao C., Qiu W., Hu X., Peng F., Lu Z. Antibodies target microvessels in neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis patients. Neurol. Res. 2013, 35(9):922-929.
14. Misu T., Fujihara K., Kakita A., et al. Loss of aquaporin 4 in lesions of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Brain 2007, 130(Pt 5):1224-1234.
15. Misu T., Hoftberger R., Fujihara K., et al. Presence of six different lesion types suggests diverse mechanisms of tissue injury in neuromyelitis optica. Acta Neuropathol. 2013, 125(6):815-827.
16. Mundegar R.R., Franke E., Schafer R., Zweyer M., Wernig A. Reduction of high background staining by heating unfixed mouse skeletal muscle tissue sections allows for detection of thermostable antigens with murine monoclonal antibodies. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2008, 56(11):969-975.
17. Polman C.H., Reingold S.C., Banwell B., et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann. Neurol. 2011, 69(2):292-302.
18. Ratelade J., Bennett J.L., Verkman A.S. Intravenous neuromyelitis optica autoantibody in mice targets aquaporin-4 in peripheral organs and area postrema. PLoS One 2011, 6(11):e27412.
19. Saji E., Arakawa M., Yanagawa K., et al. Cognitive impairment and cortical degeneration in neuromyelitis optica. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 73(1):65-76.
20. Scott T.F., Kassab S.L., Pittock S.J. Neuromyelitis optica IgG status in acute partial transverse myelitis. Arch. Neurol. 2006, 63(10):1398-1400.
21. Shimizu F., Sano Y., Takahashi T., et al. Sera from neuromyelitis optica patients disrupt the blood-brain barrier. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2012, 83(3):288-297.
22. Takahashi T., Fujihara K., Nakashima I., et al. Establishment of a new sensitive assay for anti-human aquaporin-4 antibody in neuromyelitis optica. Tohoku J. Exp. Med. 2006, 210(4):307-313.
23. Tzartos J.S., Stergiou C., Kilidireas K., Zisimopoulou P., Thomaidis T., Tzartos S.J. Anti-aquaporin-1 autoantibodies in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. PLoS One 2013, 8(9):e74773.
24. Verkman A.S. Aquaporin water channels and endothelial cell function. J. Anat. 2002, 200(6):617-627.
25. Wingerchuk D.M., Lennon V.A., Pittock S.J., Lucchinetti C.F., Weinshenker B.G. Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2006, 66(10):1485-1489.