Enhanced recovery in the resection of colorectal liver metastases

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 110, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 197-202

  Dunne, Declan F J ^a,b   Yip, Vincent S ^a   Jones, Robert P ^a,b   McChesney, Ewan A ^c   Lythgoe, Daniel T ^b   Psarelli, Eftychia E ^b   Jones, Louise ^a   Lacasia Purroy, Carmen ^a   Malik, Hassan Z ^a   Poston, Graeme J ^a,b   Fenwick, Stephen W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL AINTREE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

colorectal liver metastasis; enhanced recovery; ERAS; fast track; hepatectomy

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; FENTANYL; LEVOBUPIVACAINE;

ADULT; AGED; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER STAGING; COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASIS; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVER RESECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MICROWAVE THERAPY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASIS; ENHANCED RECOVERY; ERAS; FAST TRACK; HEPATECTOMY;

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CRITICAL CARE; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEPATECTOMY; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVER NEOPLASMS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PERIOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84904055816     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23616     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, et al.: Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery 2011; 149: 830-840.
2. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, et al.: Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 961-969.
3. Leibman BD, Dillioglugil O, Abbas F, et al.: Impact of a clinical pathway for radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1998; 52: 94-99. (Pubitemid 28317936)
4. Niino T, Hata M, Sezai A, et al.: Optimal clinical pathway for the patient with type B acute aortic dissection. Circ J 2009; 73: 264-268.
5. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, et al.: Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; CD007635. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21328298
6. Hall TC, Dennison AR, Bilku DK, et al.: Enhanced recovery programmes in hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: A systematic review. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2012; 94: 318-326.
7. Jones C, Kelliher L, Dickinson M, et al.: Randomized clinical trial on enhanced recovery versus standard care following open liver resection. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 1015-1024.
8. Ni CY, Yang Y, Chang YQ, et al.: Fast-track surgery improves postoperative recovery in patients undergoing partial hepatectomy for primary liver cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 39: 542-547.
9. Schultz NA, Larsen PN, Klarskov B, et al.: Evaluation of a fast-track programme for patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 138-143.
10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A,: Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213. (Pubitemid 38963009)
11. Adam R, Bhangui P, Poston G, et al.: Is perioperative chemotherapy useful for solitary, metachronous, colorectal liver metastases ? Ann Surg 2010; 252: 774-787.
12. van Dam RM, Hendry PO, Coolsen MME, et al.: Initial experience with a multimodal enhanced recovery programme in patients undergoing liver resection. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 969-975.
13. Junejo MA, Mason JM, Sheen AJ, et al.: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing for preoperative risk assessment before hepatic resection. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 1097-1104.
14. Older P, Hall A, Hader R,: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing as a screening test for perioperative management of major surgery in the elderly. Chest 1999; 116: 355.
15. Older P, Hall A,: Clinical review: How to identify high-risk surgical patients. Crit Care 2004; 8: 369-372. (Pubitemid 39468059)
16. Jarnagin WR, Gonen M, Fong Y, et al.: Improvement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: Analysis of 1,803 consecutive cases over the past decade. Ann Surg 2002; 236: 397-406; discussion 406-407.
17. Reddy SK, Barbas AS, Turley RS, et al.: A standard definition of major hepatectomy: Resection of four or more liver segments. HPB (Oxford) 2011; 13: 494-502.
18. Zimmitti G, Roses RE, Andreou A, et al.: Greater complexity of liver surgery is not associated with an increased incidence of liver-related complications except for bile leak: An experience with 2,628 consecutive resections. J Gastrointest Surg 2013; 17: 57-64; discussion p. 64-65.
19. Tzimas P, Prout J, Papadopoulos G, et al.: Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia for liver resection. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 628-635.
20. Sakowska M, Docherty E, Linscott D, et al.: A change in practice from epidural to intrathecal morphine analgesia for hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1802-1808.