Modeling social-ecological problems in coastal ecosystems: A case study

Complexity

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 73-82

  Forrester, John ^a   Greaves, Richard ^a   Noble, Howard ^b   Taylor, Richard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c STOCKHOLM ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Agent based models; Participatory modeling; Unified modeling language

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904045906     PISSN: 10762787     EISSN: 10990526     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cplx.21524     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ackhoff, R. Redesigning the Future; Wiley: New York, 1974.
2. Law, J. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research; Routledge: London and New York, 2004.
3. Edmonds, B.; Moss, S. From KISS to KIDS an 'anti-simplistic modelling approach'. In: Multi Agent Based Simulation; Moss, S.; Davidsson, P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, 2005; pp 130-144.
4. Eden, S.; Donaldson, A.; Walker, G. Structuring subjectivities? Using Q methodology in human geography. Area 37, 2005, 413-422.
5. Bharwani, S. Understanding complex behavior and decision making using ethnographic knowledge elicitation tools (KnETs). Soc Sci Comput Rev 2006, 24, 78-105.
6. Rahman, A.; Mallick, D.; Haque, N.; Nishat, A. Trends in Natural Resource Management in Bangladesh: Looking for Integration and a New Institutional Framework; Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies, UK Department for International Development, Natural Resource Management Workshop, Paper Series # 2, Dhaka, 2002.
7. Coulthard, S.; Johnson, D.; McGregor, A. Poverty, sustainability and human wellbeing: A social wellbeing approach to the global fisheries crisis. Global Environ Change 2011, 21, 453-463.
8. de Vries, B.; Petersen, A. Conceptualizing sustainable development: an assessment methodology connecting values, knowledge, worldviews and scenarios. Ecol Econ 2009, 68, 1006-1019.
9. Anselme, B.; Bousquet, F.; Lyetc, A.; Étienne, M.; Fady, B.; Le Page, C. Modelling of spatial dynamics and biodiversity conservation on Lure mountain (France). Environ Modell Software 2010, 25, 1385-1398.
10. Bousquet, F.; Barreteau, O.; Le Page, C.; Mullon, C.; Weber, J. An environmental modelling approach. The use of multi-agents simulations. In: Advances in Environmental and Ecological Modelling; Blasco, F.; Weill, A., Eds.; Elsevier: Paris, 1999; pp 113-122.
11. Bousquet, F.; Le Page, C. Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: A review. Ecol Modell 2004, 176, 313-332.
12. Étienne, M. Companion modelling: A tool for dialogue and concertation in biosphere reserves. In: Biodiversity and Stakeholders: Concertation Itineraries. Biosphere Reserves--Technical Notes 1; Bouamrane, M., Ed.; UNESCO: Paris, 2006; pp 44-53.
13. Étienne, M.; Cibien, C.; Génot, J.-C. An example of companion approach which could be used during the periodic review. In: Dialogue in Biosphere Reserves. References, Practices and Experiences. Biosphere Reserves--Technical Notes 2; Bouamrane, M., Ed.; UNESCO: Paris, 2007; pp 53-59.
14. Étienne, M.; Du Toit, S.; Pollard, S. ARDI: A co-construction method for participatory modelling in natural resources management. Ecol Soc 16(1), Article 44, 2011.
15. Kemp-Benedict, E.; Bharwani, S.; Fischer, M. Using matching methods to link social and physical analyses for sustainability planning. Ecol Soc 15(3), Article 4, 2010.
16. Andrews, P.; Polack, F.; Sampson, A.; Stepney, S.; Timmis, J. The CosMoS Process: A Process for the Modelling and Simulation of Complex Systems; University of York: York, 2010.
17. Polack, F.; Andrews, P.; Ghetiu, T.; Read, M.; Stepney, S.; Timmis, J.; Sampson, A. Reflections on the simulation of complex systems for science. In: ICECCS: Fifteenth IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems; IEEE Press, 2010; pp 276-285.
18. Larman, C. Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Orientated Analysis and Design and Iterative Development; Prentice Hall: Westford, Mass., 2005.
19. Booch, G.; Rumbaugh, J.; Jacobson, I. The Unified Modelling Language User Guide; Addison-Wesley Longman: Reading, MA, 2005.
20. Fowler, M. UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Object Modelling Language; Addison-Wesley: Boston, 2004.
21. Greaves, R.; Polack, F.; Forrester, J. CoSMoS in the context of social-ecological systems research. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Workshop on Complex Systems Modelling and Simulation: CoSMoS; Stepney, S.; Andrews, P.; Read, M., Eds.; Luniver Press: Frome, UK, 2012; pp 47-76.
22. Mashanova, A.; Law, R. Resource dynamics, social interactions, and the tragedy of the commons. In: Micro, Meso, Macro: Addressing Complex Systems Couplings; Liljenström, H., Svedin, U., Eds; World Scientific Publishing, Singapore, 2005; pp 135-146.
23. Fioretti, G.; Visser, B. A cognitive interpretation of organisational complexity. Emergence: Complexity and Organisation (E:CO) 2004, 6, 11-23.
24. Özemi, U.; Özemi, S. Ecological modelling based on people's knowledge: A multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol Modell 2004, 176, 43-64.
25. Macy, M.; Willer, R. From Factors to Actors: computational sociology and agent-based modelling. Annu Rev Soc 2002, 28, 143-166.