The benefits and challenges of robotic-assisted hysterectomy

Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 290-294

  Smorgick, Noam ^a   As Sanie, Sawsan ^b  

^a ASSAF HAROFEH MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning curve; Robotic surgery; Robotic assisted hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; DISPOSABLE EQUIPMENT; ENDOMETRIOSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HOSPITALIZATION COST; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; LAPAROTOMY; LEARNING CURVE; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PELVIC DISEASE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; DEVICES; FEMALE; LAPAROSCOPY; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; OPERATIVE TIME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROBOTICS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84904036424     PISSN: 1040872X     EISSN: 1473656X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000080     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Paraiso MF, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, et al. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 208:368.e1-368.e7.
2. Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovic N, et al. Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120:604-611.
3. Wright JD, Ananth CV, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 2013; 309:689-698.
4. Rosero EB, Kho KA, Joshi GP, et al. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:778-786.
5. Sarlos D, Kots LA. Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2011; 23:283-288.
6. Rardin CR. The debate over robotics in benign gynecology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 210:418-422.
7. Advincula AP. Robotics in gynecology: is the glass half empty or half full? Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:3-4.
8. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, et al. Hysterectomy rates in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110:1091-1095.
9. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, et al. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114:1041-1048.
10. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 3:CD003677.
11. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J, et al. Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122:233-241.
12. Smorgick N, Patzkowsky KE, Hoffman MR, et al. The increasing use of robotassisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2014; 289:101-105.
13. Brinkman WM, Luursema JM, Kengen B, et al. da Vinci skills simulator for assessing learning curve and criterion-based training of robotic basic skills. Urology 2013; 81:562-566.
14. Lim PC, Kang E, Park do H. A comparative detail analysis of the learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in treatment of endometrial cancer: a case-matched controlled study of the first one hundred twenty two patients. Gynecol Oncol 2011; 120:413-418.
15. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15:589-594.
16. Woelk JL, Casiano ER, Weaver AL, et al. The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 121:87-95.
17. Eisenberg D, Vidovszky TJ, Lau J, et al. Comparison of robotic and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery systems in a suturing and knot tying task. Surg Endosc 2013; 27:3182-3186.
18. Chandra V1, Nehra D, Parent R, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery 2010; 147:830-839.
19. Woelk JL, Borah BJ, Trabuco EC, et al. Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 123:255-262.
20. Barnett JC, Judd JP, Wu JM, et al. Cost comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116:685-693.
21. Martino MA, Berger EA, McFetridge JT, et al. A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. nonrobotic approaches. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014; 21:389-393.
22. Geller EJ, Matthews CA. Impact of robotic operative efficiency on profitability. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209:20.e1-20.e5.