Resident and tourist preferences for stormwater management strategies in Oahu, Hawaii

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 98, Issue , 2014, Pages 79-85

  Penn, Jerrod ^a   Hu, Wuyang ^a   Cox, Linda ^b   Kozloff, Lara ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; STORM SEWERS; TESTING; STORMS;

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; COASTAL MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES; RECREATIONAL BEACHES; STORM-WATER MANAGEMENTS; STORMWATER QUALITY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

STORMS; QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; POLICY MAKING; RECREATIONAL FACILITY; RESIDENT POPULATION; STORMWATER; TOURIST BEHAVIOR; WARNING SYSTEM; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WILLINGNESS TO PAY; BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY;

HAWAII [UNITED STATES]; HAWAIIAN ISLANDS; OAHU; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84904017753     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.06.002     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Adamowicz W., Louviere J., Williams M. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. J.Environ. Econ. Manag. 1994, 26:271-292.
2. Alfnes F., Guttormsen A.G., Steine G., Kolstad K. Consumers' willingness to pay for the color of salmon: a choice experiment with real economic incentives. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 2006, 88:1050-1061.
3. Ariza E., Ballester R. On the relationship between quality, users' perception and economic valuation in NW Mediterranean beaches. Ocean. Coast Manage. 2012, 63:55-66.
4. Beharry-Borg N., Scarpa R. Valuing quality changes in Caribbean coastal waters for heterogeneous beach visitors. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69:1124-1139.
5. Carlsson F., Martinsson P. Do hypothetical and actual marginal willingness to pay differ in choice experiments?: Application to the valuation of the environment. J.Environ. Econ. Manag. 2001, 41:179-192.
6. Carson R., Groves T. Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environ. Res. Econ. 2007, 37:181-210.
7. Day B.H., Bateman I.J., Carson R.T., Dupont D., Louviere J.J., Morimoto S., Scarpa R., Wang P. Ordering effects and choice set awareness in repeat-response stated preference studies. J.Environ. Econ. Manag. 2012, 63:73-91.
8. Dixon A.W., Oh C., Draper J. Access to the Beach: comparing the economic values of coastal residents and tourists. J.Travel Res. 2012, 51(6):742-753.
9. Dorfman M., Rosselot K.S. Testing the Waters: a Guide to Water Quality Testing at Vacation Baches 2008-2012, Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC.
10. Eggert H., Olsson B. Valuing multi-attribute marine water quality. Mar. policy 2009, 33:201-206.
11. Hawaii Tourism Authority 2007-2010 Annual Visitor Research Report 2007-2010, Honolulu, HI.
12. Hawaii Tourism Authority 2011 Annual Visitor Research Report 2011, Honolulu, HI.
13. Hensher D.A., Rose J.M., Greene W.H. Applied Choice Analysis: a Primer 2005, Cambridge University Press.
14. Huang J., Poor P., Zhao M. Economic valuation of beach erosion control. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2007, 22:221-238.
15. Kanninen B.J. Valuing Environmental Amenities Using Stated Choice Studies: a Common Sense Approach to Theory and Practice 2007, Springer.
16. Kinzelman J.L., McLellan S.L. Success of science-based best management practices in reducing swimming bans - a case study from Racine, Wisconsin, USA. Aquat. Ecosyst. Health 2009, 12:187-196.
17. Kline J.D., Swallow S.K. The demand for local access to coastal recreation in southern New England. Coast Manage. 1998, 26:177-190.
18. Krinsky I., Robb A.L. On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1986, 715-719.
19. Landry C.E., Keeler A.G., Kriesel W. An economic evaluation of beach erosion management alternatives. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2003, 18:105-128.
20. Little J., Berrens R. Explaining disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values: further investigation using meta-analysis. Econ. Bull. 2004, 3:1-13.
21. Loomis J., Santiago L. Economic valuation of Beach quality improvements: comparing incremental attribute values estimated from two stated preference valuation methods. Coast Manage. 2013, 41:75-86.
22. McFadden D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior 1973.
23. Moeltner K., Boyle K.J., Paterson R.W. Meta-analysis and benefit transfer for resource valuation-addressing classical challenges with Bayesian modeling. J.Environ. Econ. Manag. 2007, 53:250-269.
24. Mulhern M.G. Assessing the Relative Efficiency of Fixed and Randomized Experimental Designs 1999, Sawtooth Software Conference.
25. Murray C., Sohngen B., Pendleton L. Valuing water quality advisories and beach amenities in the Great Lakes. Water Resour. Res. 2001, 37:2583-2590.
26. Needham M.D., Collins R.L., Connor W.M., Culnane M.J.W. Recreation Carrying Capacity and Management at Kailua Beach Park on Oahu, Hawaii 2008, Hawaii Coral Reef Initiative research program, Oregon State University.
27. Needham M.D., Szuster B.W., Bell C.M. Encounter norms, social carrying capacity indicators, and standards of quality at a marine protected area. Ocean. Coast Manage. 2011, 54:633-641.
28. Obropta C.C., Kardos J.S. Review of urban stormwater quality models: deterministic, stochastic, and hybrid approaches1. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007, 43:1508-1523.
29. Oh C., Dixon A.W., Mjelde J.W., Draper J. Valuing visitors' economic benefits of public beach access points. Ocean. Coast Manage. 2008, 51:847-853.
30. Oh C., Draper J., Dixon A. Assessing tourists' multi-attribute preferences for public beach access. Coast Manage 2009, 37:119-135.
31. Oh C., Draper J., Dixon A. Comparing resident and tourist preferences for public beach access and related amenities. Ocean. Coast Manage. 2010, 53:245-251.
32. Parsons G.R., Kang A.K., Leggett C.G., Boyle K.J. Valuing Beach closures on the Padre island national Seashore. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2009, 24:213-235.
33. Pinnell J. Comment on Huber: Practical Suggestions for CBC Studies 2005, Sawtooth software research paper.
34. Poe G.L., Giraud K.L., Loomis J.B. Computational methods for measuring the difference of empirical distributions. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 2005, 87:353-365.
35. Revelt D., Train K.E. Mixed logit with repeated choices: households' choices of appliance efficiency level. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1998, 80:647-657.
36. Rigby D., Alcon F., Burton M. Supply uncertainty and the economic value of irrigation water. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 2010, 37:97-117.
37. Sawtooth Software The CBC System for Choice-based Conjoint Analysis Version 8 2013, Technical Paper Series, Orem, Utah.
38. Train K.E., Sonnier G. Mixed Logit with Bounded Distributions of Correlated Partworths, Applications of Simulation Methods in Environmental and Resource Economics 2005, 117-134. Springer.
39. U.S.Census Bureau American Community Survey Housing Characteristics 2007-2011.
40. U.S.Census Bureau State & County QuickFacts: Honolulu County, Hawaii 2012.
41. US Environmental Protection Agency Clean Watersheds Needs Survey 2004 Report to Congress 2008, http://water.epa.gov/scitech/datait/databases/cwns/upload/2008_01_09_2004rtc_cwns2004rtc.pdf.
42. Vosser C., Doyon M., Rondeau D. Truth in consequentiality: theory and field evidence on discrete choice experiments. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 2012, 4:145-171.
43. Weiss P.T., Gulliver J.S., Erickson A.J. Cost and pollutant removal of storm-water treatment practices. J.Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 2007, 133:218-229.
44. Whitehead J.C., Dumas C.F., Hill J., Buerger B. Valuing beach access and width with revealed and stated preference data. Mar. Resour. Econ. 2008, 23:119.
45. Windle J., Rolfe J. Estimating nonmarket values of Brisbane (state capital) residents for state based beach recreation. Ocean. Coast Manage. 2013, 85:103-111.