Robust dimensionality reduction and damage detection approaches in structural health monitoring

Structural Health Monitoring

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 406-417

  Khoa, Nguyen L D ^a   Zhang, Bang ^a   Wang, Yang ^a   Chen, Fang ^a   Mustapha, Samir ^a  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

damage detection; dimensionality reduction; random projection; Structural health monitoring; support vector machine

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BRIDGE COMPONENTS; DAMAGE DETECTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION; DIMENSIONALITY REDUCTION TECHNIQUES; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; ONE-CLASS SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; PATTERN RECOGNITION TECHNIQUES; RANDOM PROJECTIONS; UNSUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING;

STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

EID: 84904005555     PISSN: 14759217     EISSN: 17413168     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1475921714532989     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Farrar CR,Worden K.An introduction to structural health monitoring.Philos T R Soc A. 2007;365 (1851): 303-315.
2. Sohn H,Farrar CR,Hemez FM, et alA review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996-2001. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory; 2004:.
3. Worden K,Farrar CR,Manson Get al.The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring.P R Soc A. 2007;463 (2082): 1639-1664.
4. Worden K,Manson G.The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring.Philos T R Soc A. 2007;365 (1851): 515-537.
5. Doebling SW,Farrar CR,Prime MB, et alDamage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review. Los Alamos, NM: Los Alamos National Laboratory; 1996:.
6. Cortes C,Vapnik V.Support-vector networks.Mach Learn. 1995;20 (3): 273-297.
7. Schölkopf B,Platt JC,Shawe-Taylor JCet al.Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution.Neural Comput. 2001;13 (7): 1443-1471.
8. Sohn H,Czarnecki J,Farrar C.Structural health monitoring using statistical process control.J Struct Eng: ASCE. 2000;126 (11): 1356-1363.
9. Worden K,Manson G.Visualization and dimension reduction of high-dimensional data for damage detection.Proc Soc Photo Opt Instrum Eng. 1999 1576;3727:.
10. Mujica LE,Veh J,Ruiz Met al.Multivariate statistics process control for dimensionality reduction in structural assessment.Mech Syst Signal Pr. 2008;22 (1): 155-171.
11. Achlioptas D.Database-friendly random projections. Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGMOD-SIGACT-SIGART symposium on principles of database systems, PODS '01; Santa Barbara, CA;. 274.
12. Bingham E,Mannila H.Random projection in dimensionality reduction: applications to image and text data. Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, KDD '01; San Francisco, CA;. 245.
13. Worden K,Manson G,Fieller N.Damage detection using outlier analysis.J Sound Vib. 2000;229 (3): 647-667.
14. Bishop CMNeural networks for pattern recognition. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc; 1995:.
15. Zang C,Imregun M.Structural damage detection using artificial neural networks and measured FRF data reduced via principal component projection.J Sound Vib. 2001;242 (5): 813-827.
16. Lee JW,Kim JD,Yun CBet al.Health-monitoring method for bridges under ordinary traffic loadings.J Sound Vib. 2002;257 (2): 247-264.
17. Lee JJ,Lee JW,Yi JHet al.Neural networks-based damage detection for bridges considering errors in baseline finite element models.J Sound Vib. 2005;280 (3-5): 555-578.
18. Zang C,Friswell MI,Imregun M.Structural damage detection using independent component analysis.Struct Health Monit. 2004;3 (1): 69-83.
19. Chan THT,Ni YQ,Ko JM.Neural network novelty filtering for anomaly detection. Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on structural health monitoring; Stanford, CA;. 133.
20. Kramer MA.Nonlinear principal component analysis using autoassociative neural networks.Am Inst Chem Eng J. 1991;37 (2): 233-243.
21. Jolliffe ITPrincipal component analysis. 2nd ed.New York: Springer, 2002.New York: Springer; 2002:.
22. Keogh E,Chakrabarti K,Pazzani Met al.Dimensionality reduction for fast similarity search in large time series databases.Knowl Inf Syst. 2001;3 (3): 263-286.
23. Johnson W,Lindenstrauss J.Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space.Contemp Math. 1984;26:189-206.
24. Boser BE,Guyon IM,Vapnik VN.A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. Proceedings of the 5th annual workshop on computational learning theory, COLT '92; Pittsburgh, PA;. 144.
25. Los Alamos National Laboratory, http://institute.lanl.gov/ei/software-and-data/ (accessed 1 June 2013).