Multicenter randomized controlled trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme: EnROL

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 32, Issue 17, 2014, Pages 1804-1811

  Kennedy, Robin H ^a   Francis, E Anne ^b   Wharton, Rose ^b   Blazeby, Jane M ^c   Quirke, Philip ^d   West, Nicholas P ^d   Dutton, Susan J ^b  

^a ST MARK S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; BLADDER INJURY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CHEST INFECTION; COLORECTAL CANCER; COLORECTAL SURGERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HEART FAILURE; HEART INFARCTION; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INFECTIOUS COMPLICATION; INTESTINE INJURY; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; KIDNEY FAILURE; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPY; LUNG COMPLICATION; LUNG INSUFFICIENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN SURGERY; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARALYTIC ILEUS; PHASE 3 CLINICAL TRIAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY FAILURE; SURGICAL INFECTION; UNITED KINGDOM; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND DEHISCENCE;

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84903996629     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: 15277755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.54.3694     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ: Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 91:1111-1124, 2004 (Pubitemid 39179453)
2. Bartels S, Vlug M, Hollmann M, et al: Incisional hernia and adhesion-related complications: Long term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic with open colonic resection within a fast track program [the LAparoscopy and/or FAst track multimodal management versus standard care study (LAFA)]. Presented at the Seventh Scientific and Annual Meeting of the European Society of Coloproctology, Vienna, Austria, September 26-28, 2012
3. Ng SS, Leung KL, Lee JF, et al: Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: Ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52:558-566, 2009
4. Varadhan KK, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O: Enhanced recovery after surgery: The future of improving surgical care. Crit Care Clin 26:527-547, x, 2010
5. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al: Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial. Lancet 359:2224-2229, 2002 (Pubitemid 34717975)
6. King PM, Blazeby JM, Ewings P, et al: Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. Br J Surg 93:300-308, 2006
7. Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, et al: Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: A randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 241:416-423, 2005 (Pubitemid 40299717)
8. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbølle P, et al: A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232:51-57, 2000 (Pubitemid 30456550)
9. Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al: Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: A randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Ann Surg 254:868-875, 2011
10. Kennedy RH, Francis A, Dutton S, et al: EnROL: A multicentre randomised trial of conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme. BMC Cancer 12:181, 2012
11. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. www.erassociety.org
12. UK Department of Health: Enhanced Recovery Partnership Programme: Report-March 2011. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/enhanced-recovery- partnership-programme
13. Smets EM, Garssen B, Cull A, et al: Application of the multidimensional fatigue inventory (MFI-20) in cancer patients receiving radiotherapy. Br J Cancer 73:241-245, 1996 (Pubitemid 26028340)
14. Machin D, Cheung YB, Parmar MKB: Survival Analysis: A Practical Approach. Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley and Sons, 2006
15. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205-213, 2004 (Pubitemid 38963009)
16. Coleman MG, Hanna GB, Kennedy R, et al: The National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery in England: A new training paradigm. Colorectal Dis 13:614-616, 2011
17. Laparoscopically assisted colectomy is as safe and effective as open colectomy in people with colon cancer: Abstracted from: Nelson H, Sargent D, Wieand HS, et al for the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group: A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;350: 2050-2059.
18. Cancer Treat Rev 30:707-709, 2004
19. Kang SB, Park JW, Jeong SY, et al: Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): Short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 11:637-645, 2010
20. West NP, Morris EJ, Rotimi O, et al: Pathology grading of colon cancer surgical resection and its association with survival: A retrospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 9:857-865, 2008
21. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, et al: Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): Short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:210-218, 2013
22. Buchanan GN, Malik A, Parvaiz A, et al: Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:893-902, 2008
23. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al: Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: Prospective randomised trial. Lancet 363:1187-1192, 2004 (Pubitemid 38481844)
24. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, et al: Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): Multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718-1726, 2005 (Pubitemid 40719107)
25. Veldkamp R, Gholghesaei M, Bonjer HJ, et al: Laparoscopic resection of colon Cancer: Consensus of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). Surg Endosc 18:1163-1185, 2004 (Pubitemid 39014855)
26. Hewett PJ, Allardyce RA, Bagshaw PF, et al: Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: The ALCCaS trial. Ann Surg 248:728-738, 2008