The impact of beaver dams on the morphology of a river in the eastern United States with implications for river restoration

Earth Surface Processes and Landforms

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 1236-1244

  Curran, Joanna Crowe ^a   Cannatelli, Kristen M ^a,b  

^a University of Virginia   (United States)

^b Interfluve Environmental   (United States)

Author keywords

Bank stability; Beaver dam; Restoration

Indexed keywords

BANK PROTECTION; DAMS; DEPOSITION; DIGITAL STORAGE; EROSION; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MORPHOLOGY; RESTORATION; RIVERS;

BANK STABILITY; CHANNEL MIGRATION; CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; CHANNEL STABILITY; LONG-TERM EFFECTS; RESTORATION PROJECT; RESTORATION TECHNIQUES; WESTERN UNITED STATES;

RESERVOIRS (WATER);

BANK EROSION; CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; DAM; DEPOSITION; ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION; FLUVIAL GEOMORPHOLOGY; RIVER BANK; RIVER MANAGEMENT;

ATLANTIC COASTAL PLAIN; UNITED STATES;

CASTORIDAE;

EID: 84903994305     PISSN: 01979337     EISSN: 10969837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/esp.3576     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Albert S, Trimble T. 2000. Beavers are partners in riparian restoration on the Zuni Indian Reservation. Ecological Restoration 18(2): 87-92.
2. Bunte K, Swingle K, Potyondy J, Abt S. 2011. Beaver Dam Effects on Gravel Transport Patterns - a Case Study, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 1, 0711. American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC.
3. Burchsted D, Daniels M, Thorson R, Vokoun J. 2010. The river discontinuum: applying beaver modifications to baseline conditions for restoration of forested headwaters. Bioscience 60(11): 908-922.
4. Burchsted D, Daniels MD. 2014. Classification of the alterations of beaver dams to headwater streams in northeastern Connecticut, U.S.A. Geomorphology 205: 36-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.029
5. Butler DR. 2012. Characteristics of beaver ponds on deltas in a mountain environment. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 37: 876-882. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3218
6. Butler DR, Malanson GP. 1995. Sedimentation rates and patterns in beaver ponds in a mountain environment. Geomorphology 13: 255-269. DOI: 10.1016/0169-555X(95)00031-Y
7. Cannatelli KM, Curran JC. 2012. Importance of hydrology on channel evolution following dam removal case study and conceptual model. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 138(5): 377-390.
8. Collen P, Gibson RJ. 2001. The general ecology of beavers (Castor spp.), as related to their influence on stream ecosystems and riparian habitats, and the subsequent effects on fish - a review. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 10: 439-461.
9. Dougherty ME. 2008. Lake Charles Drawdown and Stream Restoration: Impact on Structure and Function of Kimages Creek, PhD Thesis. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
10. Doyle MW, Stanley EH, Selle AR, Stofleth JM, Harbor JM. 2003. Predicting the depth of erosion in reservoirs following dam removal using bank stability analysis. International Journal of Sediment Research 18: 115-121.
11. Fuller MR, Peckarsky BL. 2011. Ecosystem engineering by beavers affects mayfly life histories. Freshwater Biology 56: 969-979. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02548.x
12. Gorshkov YA, Easter-Pilcher AL, Pilcher BK, Gorshkov D. 1999. Ecological restoration by harnessing the work of beavers. In Beaver Protection, Management, and Utilization in Europe and North America, Busher PE, Dzieciolowsk RM (eds). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers: New York; 67-76.
13. Green KC, Westbrook CJ. 2009. Changes in riparian area structure, channel hydraulics, and sediment yield following loss of beaver dams. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management 10: 68-79.
14. Gurnell AM. 1998. The hydrogeomorphological effects of beaver dam-building activity. Progress in Physical Geography 22: 167-189.
15. Harrelson D. 1998. Beavers making a slow comeback. Loundoun Wildlife Conservancy 3(2): 1-2.
16. Hay KG. 2010. Succession of beaver ponds in Colorado 50 years after beaver removal. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74: 1732-1736. DOI: 10.2193/2009-055
17. Hupp CR. 2000. Hydrology, geomorphology and vegetation of Coastal Plain Rivers in the south-eastern USA. Hydrological Processes 14(16-17): 2991-3010.
18. Ives RL. 1942. The beaver-meadow complex. Journal of Geomorphology 5(3): 191-203.
19. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M. 1997. Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78: 1946-1957.
20. Lawton JH, Jones CG. 1995. Linking Species and Ecosystems: Organisms as Ecosystem Engineers. Springer: Berlin; 141-150.
21. Levine R, Meyer GA. 2014. Beaver dams and channel sediment dynamics on Odell Creek, Centennial Valley, Montana, USA. Geomorphology 205: 51-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.04.035
22. Marshall KN, Hobbs NT, Cooper DJ. 2013. Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society - Biological Sciences. 280: 1-7. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2977
23. McCullough MC, Harper JL, Eisenhauer DE, Dosskey MG. 2004. Channel aggradation by beaver dams on a small agricultural stream in Eastern Nebraska. In Self-Sustaining Solutions for Streams, Wetlands, and Watersheds, A'Ambrosio JL (ed.), Proceedings of the ASAE Conference, 12-15 September 2004, 701P0904; 1-7.
24. McKinstry MC, Anderson SH. 2002. Survival, fates, and success of transplanted beavers, Castor canadensis, in Wyoming. Canadian Field - Naturalist 116(1): 60-68.
25. Meade RH. 1982. Sources, sinks, and storage of river sediment in the Atlantic drainage of the United States. Journal of Geology 90(3): 235-252.
26. Naiman RJ, Johnston CA, Kelley JC. 1988. Alteration of North American streams by beaver. Bioscience 38(11): 753-762.
27. Naiman RJ, Melilo JM, Hobbie JE. 1986. Ecosystem alteration of boreal forest streams by beaver. Ecology 67(5): 1254-1269.
28. NOAA Coastal Services Center. 2009. Land Cover Analysis - Coastal Change Analysis Program. Available at http://www.csc.noaa.gov/crs/lca/ccap.html.
29. Nyssen J, Pontzeele J, Billi P. 2011. Effect of beaver dams on the hydrology of small mountain streams: example from the Chevral in the Ourthe Orientale basin, Ardennes, Belgium. Journal of Hydrology 402: 92-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.008
30. Palmer MA, Lettenmaier DP, Poff NL, Postel SL, Richter B, Warner R. 2009. Climate change and river ecosystems: protection and adaptation options. Environmental Management 44: 1053-1068.
31. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Follstad Shah J, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart DD, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf GM, Lave R, Meyer JL, O'Donnell TK, Pagano L, Suddeth E. 2005. Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 208-217. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01004.x
32. Persico L, Meyer G. 2013. Natural and historical variability in fluvial processes, beaver activity, and climate in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 38: 728-750. DOI: 10.1002/esp.3349
33. Pollock MM, Beechie TJ, Jordan CE. 2007. Geomorphic changes upstream of beaver dams in Bridge Creek, an incised stream channel in the interior Columbia River basin, Eastern Oregon. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32: 1178-1185.
34. Polvi LE, Wohl E. 2012. The beaver meadow complex revisited ? the role of beavers in post-glacial floodplain development. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 37: 332-346. DOI: 10.1002/esp.2261
35. Rice S, Church M. 1996. Sampling surficial fluvial gravels: the precision of size distribution percentile estimates. Journal of Sedimentary Research 66: 654-665.
36. Ruedemann R, Schoonmaker WJ. 1938. Beaver-dams as geologic agents. Science 88(2292): 535-525.
37. Townsend PA, Butler DR. 1996. Patterns of landscape use by beaver on the lower Roanoke River floodplain, North Carolina. Physical Geography 17(3): 253-269.
38. Westbrook CJ, Cooper DJ, Baker BW. 2006. Beaver dams and overbank floods influence groundwater-surface water interactions of a Rocky mountain riparian area. Water Resources Research 42: 1-12.
39. Westbrook CJ, Cooper DJ, Baker BW. 2011. Beaver assisted river valley formation. River Research and Applications 27: 247-256. DOI: 10.1002/rra.1359
40. Wilcox J, Benoit T, Mink L. 2001. Evaluation of Geomorphic Restoration Techniques Applied to Fluvial Systems. Feather River Resource Management Group. www.feather-river-river-crm.org/project-files/georest/cover.html
41. Woo M, Waddington JM. 1990. Effects of beaver dams on subarctic wetland hydrology. Arctic 34(3): 223-230.
42. Wright JP, Jones CG, Flecker AS. 2002. An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia 132: 96-101.