Depoliticisation and the Father's Clause parliamentary debates

Policy and politics

Volumn 42, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 243-258

  Bates, Stephen ^a   Jenkins, Laura ^a   Amery, Fran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Depoliticisation; Father's clause; Governance; HFE act

Indexed keywords

GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MONETARY POLICY; POLICY APPROACH; POLITICAL CONFLICT; POLITICAL ECONOMY; POLITICAL RELATIONS; POLITICAL SYSTEM;

EID: 84903993038     PISSN: 03055736     EISSN: 14708442     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1332/030557312X656007     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anleu, SR, 1992, Surrogacy: For love but not for money?, Gender and Society, 6, 2, 30-48
2. BBC, 2006, IVF father fgure clause is to go, news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/6175501stm
3. Buller, J, Flinders, M, 2005, The domestic origins of depoliticisation in the area of British economic policy, British Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 7, 526-43
4. Burnham, P, 2001, New Labour and the politics of depoliticisation, British Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 3, 2, 127-49
5. Caplan, AL, 1990, The ethics of in vitro fertilisation, in Hull, RT (ed), Ethical issues in the new reproductive technologies, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 96-108
6. Coole, D, 2000, Negativity and politics, London: Routledge
7. Daily Mail, 2012, Supermarket worker, 24, in legal bid to become Britain's frst single father using a surrogate, www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2229691/Supermarketworker-24-legal-bid-Britain's-single-father-using-surrogate.html
8. Department of Health, 2005, Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: A public consultation, London: Department of Health
9. Flinders, M, Buller, J, 2006, Depoliticisation: Principles, tactics and tools, British Politics, 1, 3, 293-318
10. Fox, M, 2009, The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Tinkering at the margins, Feminist Legal Studies, 17, 3, 333-44
11. Franklin, S, 1993, Making representations: The parliamentary debate on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, in Edwards, J, Franklin, S, Hirsch, E, Price, F, Strathern, M (eds), Technologies of procreation, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 96-131
12. Gamble, A, 2000, Politics and fate, Cambridge: Polity Press
13. Gamble, N, 2009, Considering the need for a father: The role of clinicians in safeguarding family values in UK fertility treatment, Reproductive Medicine Online, 19, S1, 15-18
14. Golombok, S, 1999, New family forms: Children raised in solo mother families, lesbian mother families, and in families created by assisted reproduction, in Balter, L, Tamis-LeMonda, C (eds), Child psychology, Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press
15. Golombok, S, MacCallum, F, Goodman, E, 2001, The test-tube generation: Parentchild relationships and the psychological wellbeing of in vitro fertilisation children at adolescence, Child Development, 72, 599-608
16. Harder, L, 1996, Depoliticising insurgency, Studies in Political Economy, 50, 37-64
17. Hay, C, 2007, Why we hate politics, Cambridge: Polity Press
18. Honig, B, 1993, Political theory and the displacement of politics, London: Cornell University Press
19. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, 2005, Human reproductive technologies and the law: Fifth report of session 2004-05, Vol I), London: The Stationery Offce
20. Howarth, D, Norval, A, Stavrakakis, Y (eds), 2000, Discourse theory and political analysis: Identities, hegemonies and social change, Manchester: Manchester University Press
21. Jenkins, L, 2011, The difference genealogy makes: Strategies for politicisation or how to extend capacities for autonomy, Political Studies, 59, 1, 156-74
22. Kettell, S, 2008, Does depoliticisation work? Evidence from Britain's membership of the Exchange Rate Mechanism, 1990-92, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 10, 4, 630-48
23. Kettell, S, 2010, Rites of passage: Discursive strategies in the 2008 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill debate, Political Studies, 58, 4, 789-808
24. Klein, R, 1989, The exploitation of a desire, Victoria: Deakin University Press
25. McCandless, J, Sheldon, S, 2010, 'No father required'? The welfare assessment in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008, Feminist Legal Studies, 18, 3, 201-25
26. Mulkay, M, 1993, Rhetorics of hope and fear in the great embryo debate, Social Studies of Science, 23, 4, 721-42
27. Mulkay, M, 1996, Frankenstein and the debate over embryo research, Science Technology and Social Values, 21, 2, 157-76
28. Norval, AJ, 2000, The things we do with words: Contemporary approaches to the analysis of ideology, British Journal of Political Science, 30, 2, 313-46
29. Oakley, A, 1980, Woman confned, Oxford: Martin Robertson
30. Purdy, LM, 1998, Assisted reproduction, in Kuhse, H, Singer, P (eds), A companion to bioethics, Oxford: Blackwell
31. Raymond, J, 1993, Women and wombs, San Francisco, CA: Harper
32. Rich, A, 1977, Of woman born, New York: Bantam
33. Rowland, R, 1992, Living laboratories, London: Cedar
34. Shildrick, M, 1997, Leaky bodies and boundaries, London: Routledge
35. Stanworth, M, 1987, Reproductive technologies, Cambridge: Polity Press
36. Steans, J, 2006, Gender and international relations, Cambridge: Polity Press
37. Throsby, K, Gill, R, 2004, 'It's different for men': Masculinity and IVF, Men and Masculinities, 6, 4, 330-48
38. Ulrich, M, Weatherall, A, 2000, Motherhood and infertility: Viewing motherhood through the lens of infertility, Feminist Psychology, 10, 323-36
39. Warnock Committee, 1984, Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Offce
40. Wood, M, Flinders, M, 2014, Rethinking depoliticisation: Beyond the governmental, Policy & Politics, Special issue, 42, 2, 151-70