The diagnostic accuracy of specific IgE to Ara h 6 in adults is as good as Ara h 2

Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

Volumn 69, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1112-1114

  Klemans, R J B ^a   Knol, E F ^a   Bruijnzeel Koomen, C A F M ^a   Knulst, A C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ara h 2; Ara h 6; peanut allergy; peanut components; specific IgE

Indexed keywords

ARA H 2; ARA H 6; FOOD ALLERGEN; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; PLACEBO; SPECIFIC IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ARA H 2 ALLERGEN, ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; ARA H 6 ALLERGEN, ARACHIS HYPOGAEA; GLYCOPROTEIN; NAPIN; PLANT ANTIGEN;

ADULT DISEASE; ALLERGY RAPID TEST; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; PEANUT; PEANUT ALLERGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ADULT; FEMALE; IMMUNOLOGY; MALE; PEANUT HYPERSENSITIVITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

2S ALBUMINS, PLANT; ADULT; ANTIGENS, PLANT; AREA UNDER CURVE; FEMALE; GLYCOPROTEINS; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN E; MALE; PEANUT HYPERSENSITIVITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84903975812     PISSN: 01054538     EISSN: 13989995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/all.12424     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Klemans RJ, Otte D, Knol M, Knol EF, Meijer Y, Gmelig-Meyling FH, et al. The diagnostic value of specific IgE to Ara h 2 to predict peanut allergy in children is comparable to a validated and updated diagnostic prediction model. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2013; 131: 157-163.
2. Ebisawa M, Moverare R, Sato S, Maruyama N, Borres MP, Komata T,. Measurement of Ara h 1-, 2-, and 3-specific IgE antibodies is useful in diagnosis of peanut allergy in Japanese children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2012; 23: 573-581.
3. Lieberman JA, Glaumann S, Batelson S, Borres MP, Sampson HA, Nilsson C,. The Utility of Peanut Components in the Diagnosis of IgE-Mediated Peanut Allergy among Distinct Populations. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2013; 1: 75-82.
4. Dang TD, Choo S, Licciardi PV, Koplin JJ, Martin PE, Tan T, et al. Increasing the accuracy of peanut allergy diagnosis using Ara H2. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012; 129: AB235.
5. Eller E, Bindslev-Jensen C,. Clinical value of component-resolved diagnostics in peanut-allergic patients. Allergy 2013; 68: 190-194.
6. Koppelman SJ, de Jong GA, Laaper-Ertmann M, Peeters KA, Knulst AC, Hefle SL, et al. Purification and immunoglobulin E-binding properties of peanut allergen Ara h 6: evidence for cross-reactivity with Ara h 2. Clin Exp Allergy 2005; 35: 490-497.
7. Klemans RJB, Broekman HCHP, Knol EF, Bruijnzeel-Koomen CAFM, Otten HG, Pasmans SGMA, et al. Ara h 2 is the best predictor for peanut allergy in adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2013; 1: 632-638.
8. Asarnoj A, Moverare R, Ostblom E, Poorafshar M, Lilja G, Hedlin G, et al. IgE to peanut allergen components: relation to peanut symptoms and pollen sensitization in 8-year-olds. Allergy 2010; 65: 1189-1195.
9. Codreanu F, Collignon O, Roitel O, Thouvenot B, Sauvage C, Vilain AC, et al. A novel immunoassay using recombinant allergens simplifies peanut allergy diagnosis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2011; 154: 216-226.
10. Asarnoj A, Glaumann S, Elfstrom L, Lilja G, Lidholm J, Nilsson C, et al. Anaphylaxis to peanut in a patient predominantly sensitized to Ara h 6. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2012; 159: 209-212.
11. Peeters KA, Koppelman SJ, Hoffen E, Tas CW, Hartog-Jager CF, Penninks AH, et al. Does skin prick test reactivity to purified allergens correlate with clinical severity of peanut allergy? Clin Exp Allergy 2007; 37: 108-115.