Toward improving the quality of cancer care: Addressing the interfaces of primary and oncology-related subspecialty care

Journal of the National Cancer Institute - Monographs

Volumn , Issue 40, 2010, Pages 3-10

  Taplin, Stephen Hunt ^a   Rodgers, Anne Brown ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CENTER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CANCER THERAPY; COOPERATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PAPANICOLAOU TEST; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; CANADA; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; ONCOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; REVIEW; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

CANADA; COMMUNICATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; PATIENT CARE MANAGEMENT; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954728552     PISSN: 10526773     EISSN: 17456614     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgq006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Committee on Quality Health Care In America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
2. Institute of Medicine, Commission on Life Sciences National Research Council. Ensuring Quality Cancer Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
3. Ginsburg JA. Achieving a high-performance health care system with universal access: what the United States can learn from other countries. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(1):55-75.
4. Nolte E, McKee CM. Measuring the health of nations: updating an earlier analysis. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(1):58-71.
5. Moses H III, Dorsey ER, Matheson DH, Thier SO. Financial anatomy of biomedical research. JAMA. 2005;294(11):1333-1342.
6. McWilliams JM. Health consequences of uninsurance among adults in the United States: recent evidence and implications. Milbank Q. 2009;87(2):443-494.
7. Donabedian A. The quality of care: how can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260(12):1743-1748.
8. Landon BE. A conceptual model of the effects of health care organizations on the quality of medical care. JAMA. 1998;279(17):1377-1382.
9. Coffey RJ. Engineering and the health care system. In: Reid PP, Compton WD, Grossman JH, Fanjiang G, eds. Building a Better Delivery System; A New Engineering/Health Care Partnership.Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2005:107-112.
10. Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12(1):4-13.
11. The Conference Board of Canada. Infant Mortality. 2009; [Internet Communication]. http://www.conferenceboard.ca/HCP/Details/Health/infant-mortality-rate.aspx
12. Taplin SH. Evaluating organized breast cancer screening implementation: the prevention of late-stage disease? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004;13(2):225-234.
13. Swensen SJ, Meyer GS, Nelson EC, et al. Cottage industry to postindustrial care-the revolution in health care delivery. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(5):e12(1)-e12(4).
14. Taplin SH, Ichikawa L, Yood MU, et al. Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(20):1518-1527.
15. Leyden WA, Manos MM, Geiger AM, et al. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process (Generic). J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(9):675-683.
16. Taplin SH, Mylks C, Lillie S, Massett H. Towards achieving the potential of information technology in cancer care delivery: user-centered design. In: Rutten LF, Hesse BW, Moser RP, Kreps GL, eds. Building the evidence base in cancer communication. Cresskill, NJ: Hamptom Press;2009:1-25.
17. Bodenheimer T. Coordinating care-a perilous journey through the health care system. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(10):1064-1071.
18. Maria Hewitt, Sheldon Greenfield, Ellen Stoval. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. Washington, DC: The National Acadamies Press; 2006.
19. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20(6):64-78.
20. Phillips KA, Morrison KR, Andersen R, Aday LA. Understanding the context of healthcare utilization: assessing environmental and provider-related variables in the behavioral model of utilization. Health Serv Res. 1998;33(3, pt 1):571-596.
21. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323(7313):625-628.
22. Zapka J, Lemon SC. Interventions for patients, providers, and health care organizations. Cancer. 2004;101(suppl 5):1165-1187.
23. Zapka J. Innovative provider-and health system-directed approaches to improving colorectal cancer screening delivery. Med Care. 2008;46(9)(suppl 1):S62-S67.
24. Lee TH. The future of primary care: the need for reinvention. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(20):2085-2086.
25. Nekhlyudov L, Latosinsky S. The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from symptoms to diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:11-17.
26. Sussman J, Baldwin LM. The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from diagnosis through primary treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:18-24.
27. Grunfeld E, Earle C. The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:25-30.
28. Han PKJ, Rayson D. The coordination of primary and oncology specialty care at the end of life. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:31-37.
29. Anhang Price R, Zapka J, Edwards H, Taplin SH. Organizational factors and the cancer screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:52-71.
30. Zapka J, Taplin SH, Anhang Price R, Cranos C, Yabroff R. Factors in quality care-the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests-problems in the steps and interfaces of care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:38-51.
31. Fennell ML, Prabhu Das I, Clauser S, Petrelli N, Salner A. The organization of multidisciplinary care teams: modeling internal and external influences on cancer care quality. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:72-80.
32. Murray DM, Pennell M, Rhoda D, Hade EM, Paskett ED. Designing studies that would address the multilayered nature of health care. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:90-96.
33. Hade EM, Murray DM, Pennell ML, et al. Intraclass correlation estimates for cancer screening outcomes: estimates and applications in the design of Group Randomized Cancer Screening Studies. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:97-103.
34. Hesse BW, Hanna C, Massett HA, Hesse NK. Outside the box: will information technology be a viable intervention to improve the quality of cancer care? J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:81-89.