Respirophasic carotid artery peak velocity variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with coronary artery disease

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 113, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 61-66

  Song, Y ^a   Kwak, Y L ^a,b   Song, J W ^a   Kim, Y J ^a   Shim, J K ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

blood flow velocity; carotid artery; Doppler ultrasound; fluid therapy; mechanical ventilation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BREATHING PATTERN; CARDIOVASCULAR MONITORING DEVICE; CAROTID ARTERY BLOOD FLOW PEAK VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERY FLOW; CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MALE; PATIENT MONITOR; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER; PULMONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE PRESSURE VARIATION; RADIAL ARTERY PRESSURE MONITOR; REAL TIME ULTRASOUND SCANNER; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; VENTILATED PATIENT;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CAROTID ARTERY; DOPPLER ULTRASOUND; FLUID THERAPY; MECHANICAL VENTILATION;

AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BLOOD PRESSURE; CAROTID ARTERIES; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; FLUID THERAPY; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY RATE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, PULSED;

EID: 84903950148     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeu057     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Osman D, Ridel C, Ray P, et al. Cardiac filling pressures are not appropriate to predict hemodynamic response to volume challenge. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 64-8
2. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med 2004; 32: 691-9
3. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest 2008; 134: 172-8
4. Boyd JH, Forbes J, Nakada TA, Walley KR, Russell JA. Fluid resuscitation in septic shock: a positive fluid balance and elevated central venous pressure are associated with increased mortality. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 259-65
5. Rosenberg AL, Dechert RE, Park PK, Bartlett RH, Network NNA. Review of a large clinical series: association of cumulative fluid balance on outcome in acute lung injury: a retrospective review of the ARDSnet tidal volume study cohort. J Intensive Care Med 2009; 24: 35-46
6. Marik PE, Cavallazzi R, Vasu T, Hirani A. Dynamic changes in arterial waveform derived variables and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 2009; 37: 2642-7
7. Michard F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 2005; 103: 419-28
8. Brennan JM, Blair JEA, Hampole C, et al. Radial artery pulse pressure variation correlates with brachial artery peak velocity variation in ventilated subjects when measured by internal medicine residents using hand-carried ultrasound devices. Chest 2007; 131: 1301-7
9. Forsyth RP, Hoffbrand BI, Melmon KL. Redistribution of cardiac output during hemorrhage in the unanesthetized monkey. Circ Res 1970; 27: 311-20
10. Kaihara S, Rutherford RB, Schwentker EP, WagnerHNJr. Distribution of cardiacoutput in experimentalhemorrhagic shockin dogs. J Appl Physiol 1969; 27: 218-22
11. Hong SW, Shim JK, Choi YS, et al. Predictors of ineffectual radial arterial pressure monitoring in valvular heart surgery. J Heart Valve Dis 2009; 18: 546-53
12. Dorman T, Breslow MJ, Lipsett PA, et al. Radial artery pressure monitoring underestimates central arterial pressure during vasopressor therapy in critically ill surgical patients. Crit Care Med 1998; 26: 1646-9
13. Feissel M, Michard F, Mangin I, Ruyer O, Faller JP, Teboul JL. Respiratory changes in aortic blood velocity as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients with septic shock. Chest 2001; 119: 867-73
14. Muller L, Louart G, Bengler C, et al. The intrathoracic blood volume index as an indicator of fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure: a comparison with central venous pressure. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 607-13
15. Monnet X, Dres M, Ferre A, et al. Prediction of fluid responsiveness by a continuous non-invasive assessment of arterial pressure in critically ill patients: comparison with four other dynamic indices. Br J Anaesth 2012; 109: 330-8
16. De Backer D, Marx G, Tan A, et al. Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring:a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 233-40
17. Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL, et al. Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 1182-7
18. Durand P, Chevret L, Essouri S, Haas V, Devictor D. Respiratory variations in aortic blood flow predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated children. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34: 888-94
19. Monge Garcia MI, Gil Cano A, Diaz Monrove JC. Brachial artery peak velocity variation to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Crit Care 2009; 13: R142
20. Marik PE, Levitov A, Young A, Andrews L. The use of bioreactance and carotid Doppler to determine volume responsiveness and blood flow redistribution following passive leg raising in hemodynamically unstable patients. Chest 2013; 143: 364-70
21. Mesquida J, Kim HK, Pinsky MR. Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume. Intensive Care Med 2011; 37: 1672-9
22. Gruenewald M, Meybohm P, Koerner S, et al. Dynamic and volumetric variables of fluid responsiveness fail during immediate postresuscitation period. Crit Care Med 2011; 39: 1953-9
23. Segers P, Mahieu D, Kips J, et al. Amplification of the pressure pulse in the upper limb in healthy, middle-aged men and women. Hypertension 2009; 54: 414-20
24. Chemla D, Hebert JL, Coirault C, et al. Total arterial compliance estimated by stroke volume-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio in humans. Am J Physiol 1998; 274: H500-5
25. Kim SY, Song Y, Shim JK, Kwak YL. Effect of pulse pressureonthe predictability of stroke volume variation for fluid responsiveness in patients with coronary disease. J Crit Care 2013; 28: 318.e1-7
26. Mitchell GF, Moye LA, Braunwald E, et al. Sphygmomanometrically determined pulse pressure is a powerful independent predictor of recurrent events after myocardial infarction in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Circulation 1997; 96: 4254-60