A fMRI study of the cross-modal interaction in the brain with an adaptable EMG prosthetic hand with biofeedback

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1280-1284

  Arieta, Alejandro Hernandez ^a   Kato, Ryu ^a   Yokoi, Hiroshi ^a   Arai, Tamio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOFEEDBACK; BIOMECHANICS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODAL ANALYSIS; PROSTHETICS; SUPERRADIANCE; USER INTERFACES;

CROSS-MODAL INTERACTION; EMG PROSTHETIC HAND; EXTERNAL DEVICES; INTELLIGENT MACHINES;

BRAIN;

ACTION POTENTIAL; ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BRAIN; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; HUMAN; MAN MACHINE INTERACTION; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; BIOFEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGY; BRAIN; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84903871438     PISSN: 05891019     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259938     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Rauterberg M. Different Effects of Auditory feedback in Man-Machine Interfaces. Human Factors in Auditory Warnings. ISBN 0-291-39849-9 (1999)
2. Hunter J, Katz J. Davis K. the effect of tactile and visual inputs on phantom limb awareness. Brain, Vol 126, p. 579-589 (2003)
3. Lotze M, Grodd W., Birbaumer N., Erb M., Huse E., and Flor H. Does use of a myoelectric prosthesis prevent cortical reorganization and phantom limb pain?. nature neuroscience, volume 2 no 6, June 1999
4. Giraux P, Sirigu A., Schneider F, Dubernard J. Cortical reorganization in motor cortex after graft of both hands. Nature Neuroscience, Volume 4 no 7, July 2001
5. Kobrinski, A. E. et al.:"Problems of bioelectric control," in Automatic and Remote Control, Proc. IstIFAC Int. Cong., Vol. 2, Coles, J.F. (Ed), Butterworths, p.619, 1960
6. Stein RB, Walley M. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983 Jun;64(6):243-8
7. Weir, R.F. ff., and Childress, D.S. and Licameli, J.N., "Motor Prostheses and the Lack of Physiologically Appropriate Feedback: Their function and connections with Manipulators, Robots and other Human-Machine Systems". Human and Machine Haptics, Section 3.21. Eds: M. Cutkosky & Srinivasan, (MIT Press); March 98
8. Simpson, D. C., (1974), "The Choice of Control System for the Multimovement Prosthesis: Extended Physiological Proprioception (e.p.p.)" in The Control of Upper-Extremity Prostheses and Orthoses (Herberts, P., Kadefors, R., Magnusson, R., and Petersen, I., Eds.), Springfield, Charles Thomas.
9. Alvaro Rios Poveda. Myoelectric prosthesis with sensorial feedback. University of New Brunswick's MyoElectric Controls/Powered Prosthetics Symposium. 2002.
10. M. Yoshida, Y. Sasaki, N Nakayama, "Sensory feedback for biomimetic prosthetic hand", BPES 2002, In Japanese "The 17th living body and physiology engineering symposium".
11. Makoto Shimojo, Takafumi Suzuki, Akio NAMIKI, Takashi Saito, Masanari Kunimoto, Ryota Makino, Hironori Ogawa, Masatoshi ISHIKAWA, and Kunihiko Mabuchi: Development of a System for Experiencing Tactile Sensation from a Robot Hand by Electrically Stimulating Sensory Nerve Fiber, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Taipei, Taiwan, 2003.9.16) pp.1264-1270
12. Samuel Crinier, Behaviour-Based Control of a Robot Hand using Tactile Sensors. Master Thesis conducted at the Center for Autonomous Systems (CAS), Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden. 2002
13. Carrie Armel K. and Ramachandran V. S. Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response Proc. R. Soc. B. 270, p. 1499-1506, 2003
14. D. Nishikawa, W. Yu, M. Maruishi, I. Watanabe, H. Yokoi, Y. Mano, and Y. Kakazu, "On-line learning based electromyography to forearm motion classifier with motor skill evaluation," JSME International Journal Series C, vol.43, no. 4, pp. 906-915, Dec. 2000.
15. Thierry Keller and Milos R. Popovic, "Real-Time Stimulation Artifact Removal In EMG Signals for Neuroprosthesis Control Applications", Proceedings of the IFESS'2000 Conference, Cleveland, USA, June 2001.
16. Masaru Maruishi, et al."Brain activation during manipulation of the myoelectric prosthetic hand: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study" Elsevier, Neuroimage 21.p. 1604-1611, 2004
17. Lotze M. "Activation of Cortical and Cerebellar Motor Areas during Executed and Imagined Hand Movements: An fMRI Study". Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. No 11, p. 491-501, 1999.
18. Katoh Ryu, Hiroshi Yokoi, Tamio Aral. Competitive learning method for robust EMG-to-Motion Classifier. IAS-9, march 7-9, 2006
19. Logothetis, N.K.: The Neural Basis of the BOLD fMRI Signal. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. (357), 1003-1037 (2002)
20. Statistical Parametric Mapping, Wellcome department of Imaging Neuroscience. http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/