A cadaveric radiographic analysis on the effect of extreme lateral interbody fusion cage placement with supplementary internal fixation on indirect spine decompression

Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 263-270

  Marulanda, German A ^a   Nayak, Aniruddh ^b   Murtagh, Ryan ^c   Santoni, Brandon G ^b   Billys, James B ^c   Castellvi, Antonio E ^c  

^a H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b FOUNDATION FOR ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH AND EDUCATION   (United States)

^c FLORIDA ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

canal area; computed tomography; foraminal area; indirect decompression; intervertebral height; lateral transpsoas approach; lumbar stenosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DECOMPRESSION; EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION CAGE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INDIRECT SPINE DECOMPRESSION; LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPINE FUSION; SPINE FUSION IMPLANT; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; BACK; BIOMECHANICS; BONE PLATE; BONE SCREW; CADAVER; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DEVICES; FEMALE; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SPINAL STENOSIS; SURGERY; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; AGED; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BONE PLATES; BONE SCREWS; CADAVER; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; FEMALE; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; LUMBOSACRAL REGION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL STENOSIS; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84903819898     PISSN: 15360652     EISSN: 15392465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828f9da1     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Airaksinen O, Herno A, Turunen V, et al. Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:2278-2282. (Pubitemid 28074059)
2. Kou J , Fischgrund J, Biddinger A, et al. Risk factors for spinal epidural hematoma after spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27:1670-1673. (Pubitemid 34839653)
3. Potter BK, Freedman BA, Verwiebe EG, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiographic results and complications in 100 consecutive patients. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:337-346. (Pubitemid 44378151)
4. Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, et al. Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19:92-97. (Pubitemid 44284152)
5. Mardjetko SM, Connolly PJ, Shott S. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. A meta-analysis of literature 1970-1993. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994;19:2256S-2265S.
6. Madhok R,Kanter AS, Extreme-lateral, minimally invasive, transpsoas approach for the treatment of far-lateral lumbar disc herniation,J Neurosurg Spine. 2010,12,347-350.
7. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, et al. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6:435-443. (Pubitemid 43964530)
8. Shen FH, Samartzis D, Khanna AJ, et al. Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar interbody fusions. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007;38:373-386. abstract vi. (Pubitemid 47042083)
9. Billiinghurst J, Akbarnia BA. Extreme lateral interbody fusion- XLIF. Curr Orthop Pract. 2009;20:238-251.
10. Pimenta L, Schaffa TL. Surgical technique: extreme lateral interbody fusion. In: Goodrich JA, Volcan IJ, eds. eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishing; 2008:87-104.
11. Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, et al. A radiographic assessment of the ability of the extreme lateral interbody fusion procedure to indirectly decompress the neural elements. S pine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:S331-S337.
12. Cornwall GB, Turner AW, Fogel GR, et al. Biomechanical analysis and review of lateral lumbar fusion constructs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:S361-S367.
13. Patwardhan AG, Havey RM, Meade KP, et al. A follower load increases the load-carrying capacity of the lumbar spine in compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:1003-1009. (Pubitemid 29222622)
14. Nayak A, Cabezas A, Santoni BG, et al. Kinematic comparison of lateral plate versus pedicle screw construct in lumbar spine instrumented with lateral cage at two levels. North American Spine Society's 26th Annual Meeting, 2011, Chicago, IL.
15. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, et al. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;28:E8.