Behavioral responses and the impact of new agricultural technologies: Evidence froma double-blind field experiment in tanzania

American Journal of Agricultural Economics

Volumn 96, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 813-830

  Bulte, Erwin ^a   Beekman, Gonne ^b   Falco, Salvatore Di ^b   Hella, Joseph ^c   Lei, Pan ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c SOKOINE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Tanzania)

Author keywords

Experimenter effect; Improved varieties; Placebo; Randomized controlled trial (RCT)

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY; BEHAVIORAL RESPONSE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FARMERS ATTITUDE; FARMERS KNOWLEDGE;

TANZANIA;

EID: 84903794845     PISSN: 00029092     EISSN: 14678276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ajae/aau015     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allcott, H., and S. Mullainathan. 2011. External Validity and Partner Selection Bias. Department of Economics, New York University.
2. Angrist, J., and J.-S. Pischke. 2010. The Credibility Revolution in Empirical Economics: How Better Research Design is Taking the Con out of Econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 3-30.
3. Ashraf, N., X. Gine, and D. Karlan. 2009. Finding Missing Markets (and a Disturbing Epilogue): Evidence from an Export Crop Adoption and Marketing Intervention in Kenya. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91: 973-990.
4. Barrett, C.B., and M.R. Carter. 2010. The Power and Pitfalls of Experiments in Development Economics: Some Nonrandom Reflections. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 32: 515-548.
5. Boisson, S., M. Kiyombo, L. Sthreshley, S. Tumba, J. Makambo, and T. Clasen. 2010. Field Assessments of a Novel Householdwater Filtration Device: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled Trial in the Democratic Republic of Congo. P.L.o.S. ONE 5:e12613.
6. Chassang, S., G. Padro i. Miquel, and E. Snowberg. 2012a. Selective Trials: A Principal-agent Approach to Randomized Controlled Experiments. American Economic Review 102: 1279-1309.
7. Chassang, S., E. Snowberg, and C. Bowles. 2012b. Accounting for Behavior in Treatment Effects: New Applications for Blind Trials. Department of Economics, Princeton University.
8. Chavas, J.-P., P.M. Kristjanson, and P. Matlon. 1991. On the Role of Information in Decision Making: The Case of Sorghum Yield in Burkina Faso. Journal of Development Economics 35: 2261-2280.
9. Dorfman, J.H. 1996. Modeling Multiple Adoption Decisions in a Joint Framework. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 547-557.
10. Duflo, E.C., M.R. Kremer, and J.M. Robinson. 2008. How High are Rates of Return to Fertilizer? Evidence from Field Experiments in Kenya. American Economic Review Papers (Papers and Proceedings Issue) 98: 482-488.
11. -. 2011. Nudging Farmers to Use Fertilizer: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Kenya. American Economic Review 101: 2350-2390.
12. Evenson, R.E., and D. Gollin. 2003. Assessing the Impact of the Green Revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science 300: 758-762. (Pubitemid 36532102)
13. Fafchamps, M. 1993. Sequential Labor Decisions Under Uncertainty: An Estimable Household Model of West African Farmers. Econometrica 61: 1173-1197.
14. Giller, K., P. Tittonell, M. Rufino, M. van Wijk, S. Zingore, P. Mapfumo, S. Adjei-Nsiah, M. Herrero, et al. 2011. Communicating Complexity: Integrated Assessment of Tradeoffs Concerning Soil Fertility Management within African Farming Systems to Support Innovation and Development. Agricultural Systems 104: 191-203.
15. Glewwe, P., M. Kremer, S. Moulin, and E. Zitzewitz. 2004. Retrospective vs. Prospective Analyses of School Inputs: The Case of Flip Charts in Kenya. Journal of Development Economics 74: 251-268. (Pubitemid 38562990)
16. Khanna, M. 2001. Sequential Adoption of Site-specific Technologies and its Implications for Nitrogen Productivity: A Double Selectivity Model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 35-51. (Pubitemid 32337881)
17. Knowler, D., and B. Bradshaw. 2007. Farmers' Adoption of Conservation Agriculture: A Review and Synthesis of Recent Research. Food Policy 32: 25-48. (Pubitemid 44872622)
18. Levitt, S., and J. List. 2011. Was There Really a Hawthorne Effect at the Hawthorne Plant? An Analysis of the Original Illumination Experiments. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 3: 224-238.
19. List, J. 2011. Why Economists Should Conduct Field Experiments and 14 Tips for Pulling One Off. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (3): 3-16.
20. Ludwig, J., J.R. Kling, and S. Mullainathan. 2011. Mechanism Experiments and Policy Evaluations. Journal of Economic Perspectives 25: 17-38.
21. Malani, A. 2006. Identifying Placebo Effects with Data from Clinical Trials. Journal of Political Economy 114: 236-256.
22. Schultz, T. 1964. Transforming Traditional Agriculture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
23. Smale, M., P.W. Heisey, and H.D. Leathers. 1995. Maize of the Ancestors and Modern Varieties: The Microeconomics of HYV Adoption in Malawi. Economic Development and Cultural Change 43: 351-368.
24. Wooldridge, J. 2002. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
25. World Bank. 2008. Agricultural for Development. Washington DC: World Development Report.
26. Zwane, A.P., J. Zinman, E. van Dusen, W. Pariente, C. Null, E. Miguel, M. Kremer, D. Karlan, et al. 2011. Being Surveyed can Change Later Behavior and Related Parameter Estimates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108: 1821-1826.