The use of expanded criteria donor organs for transplantation

Transplantation Reviews

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 41-48

  Ojo, Akinlolu ^a,b   Luan, Fu ^a   Sung, Randall S ^a,b   Merion, Robert M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

AGE; ANAMNESIS; CAUSE OF DEATH; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DONOR SELECTION; GRAFT RECIPIENT; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY DONOR; MORTALITY; ORGAN DONOR; ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33645884686     PISSN: 0955470X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trre.2006.02.004     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Karpinski J., Lajoie G., Cattran D., et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation from high-risk donors is determined by both structure and function. Transplantation 67 8 (1999) 1162-1167
2. Rosenthal J.T. Expanded criteria for cadaver organ donation in renal transplantation. Urologic Clin North Am 21 2 (1994) 283-292
3. Alexander J.W., Vaughn W.K., and Carey M.A. The use of marginal donors for organ transplantation: the older and younger donors. Transplant Proc 23 1 (1991) 905-909
4. Ratner L.E., Kraus E., Magnuson T., and Bender J.S. Transplantation of kidneys from expanded criteria donors. Surgery 119 4 (1996) 372-377
5. Golconda M.S., Whiting J.F., Smith R., Hayes R., Alexander J.W., and First M.R. Long-term outcome of kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors: a single center experience. Transplant Proc 29 (1997) 3379-3381
6. SRTR/OPTN. 2005 Annual Data Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1995 to 2004. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Office of Special Programs, Division of Transplantation, Rockville, MD; United Network for Organ Sharing, Richmond, VA; University Renal Research and Education Association, Ann Arbor, MI. 2005.
7. Danovitch G.M., Cohen D.J., Weir M.R., et al. Current status of kidney and pancreas transplantation in the United States, 1994-2003. Am J Transplant 5 4 Pt 2 (2005) 904-915
8. Rao K.V., Kasiske B.L., Odlund M.D., Ney A.L., and Anderson R.C. Influence of cadaver donor age on posttransplant renal function and graft outcome. Transplantation 49 1 (1990) 91-95
9. Campistol J.M., Manalich M., Andreu J., Oppenheimer F., Ricart M.J., and Vilardell J. Rising age limit for kidney donors. Lancet 2 8665 (1989) 744-745
10. Cofan F., Oppenheimer F., Campistol J.M., et al. Advanced age donors in the evolution of renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 27 4 (1995) 2248-2249
11. Alexander J.W., and Vaughn W.K. The use of "marginal" donors for organ transplantation. The influence of donor age on outcome. Transplantation 51 1 (1991) 135-141
12. Lee C.M., Scandling J.D., Shen G.K., Salvatierra O., Dafoe D.C., and Alfrey E.J. The kidneys that nobody wanted: support for the utilization of expanded criteria donors. Transplantation 62 12 (1996) 1832-1841
13. Jacobbi L.M., McBride V., Like K., and Rose D. Increasing the donor pool: recovery of hearts from older donors. Transplant Proc 29 (1997) 3297-3298
14. Jacobbi L.M., McBride V.A., Etheredge E.E., et al. The risks, benefits, and costs of expanding donor criteria. A collaborative prospective three-year study. Transplantation 60 12 (1995) 1491-1496
15. Ojo A.O., Hanson J.A., Meier-Kriesche H., et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol 12 3 (2001) 589-597
16. Ojo A.O., Leichtman A.B., Punch J.D., et al. Impact of pre-existing donor hypertension and diabetes mellitus on cadaveric renal transplant outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis 36 1 (2000) 153-159
17. Schnitzler M.A., Whiting J.F., Brennan D.C., et al. The expanded criteria donor dilemma in cadaveric renal transplantation. Transplantation 75 12 (2003) 1940-1945
18. Rosengard B.R., Feng S., Alfrey E.J., et al. Report of the Crystal City meeting to maximize the use of organs recovered from the cadaver donor. Am J Transplant 2 8 (2002) 701-711
19. Metzger R.A., Delmonico F.L., Feng S., Port F.K., Wynn J.J., and Merion R.M. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 3 Suppl 4 (2003) 114-125
20. Sung R.S., Guidinger M.K., and Leichtman A.B. Initial experience with the expanded criteria donor kidney allocation system: impact on utilization. (Abstract). Am J Transplant 4 Suppl 8 (2004) 303
21. Sung R.S., Guidinger M.K., Lake C.D., et al. Impact of the expanded criteria donor allocation system on the use of expanded criteria donor kidneys. Transplantation 79 9 (2005) 1257-1261
22. Cecka J.M. The OPTN/UNOS Renal Transplant Registry 2003. Clin Transpl (2003) 1-12
23. Su X., Zenios S.A., and Chertow G.M. Incorporating recipient choice in kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol 15 6 (2004) 1656-1663
24. Slakey D.P., Patel S., Joseph V., Edwin D., Burdick J., and Ratner L.E. Patient acceptance of cadaveric kidneys from expanded criteria donors. Transplant Proc 29 1-2 (1997) 116-117
25. Nyberg S.L., Matas A.J., Kremers W.K., et al. Improved scoring system to assess adult donors for cadaver renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 3 6 (2003) 715-721
26. Nyberg S.L., Baskin-Bey E.S., Kremers W., Prieto M., Henry M.L., and Stegall M.D. Improving the prediction of donor kidney quality: deceased donor score and resistive indices. Transplantation 80 7 (2005) 925-929
27. Baskin-Bey E.S., Kremers W., Stegall M.D., and Nyberg S.L. United network for organ sharing expanded criteria donors: is stratification useful?. Clin Transpl 19 3 (2005) 406-412
28. Schold J.D., Kaplan B., Baliga R.S., and Meier-Kriesche H.U. The broad spectrum of quality in deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant 5 4 Pt 1 (2005) 757-765
29. Polyak M.M., Arrington B.O., Stubenbord W.T., et al. The influence of pulsatile preservation on renal transplantation in the 1990s. Transplantation 69 2 (2000) 249-258
30. Polyak M.M., Arrington B.O., Stubenbord W.T., Kapur S., and Kinkhabwala M. Prostaglandin E1 influences pulsatile preservation characteristics and early graft function in expanded criteria donor kidneys. J Surg Res 85 1 (1999) 17-25
31. Gaber L.W., Moore L.W., Alloway R.R., Amiri M.H., Vera S.R., and Gaber A.O. Glomerulosclerosis as a determinant of posttransplant function of older donor renal allografts. Transplantation 60 4 (1995) 334-339
32. Escofet X., Osman H., Griffiths D.F., Woydag S., and Adam Jurewicz W. The presence of glomerular sclerosis at time zero has a significant impact on function after cadaveric renal transplantation. [see comment]. Transplantation 75 3 (2003) 344-346
33. Tesi R.J., Elkhammas E.A., Davies E.A., Henry M.L., and Ferguson R.M. Pulsatile kidney perfusion for evaluation of high-risk kidney donors safely expands the donor pool. Clin Transplant 8 2 Pt 1 (1994) 134-138
34. Maltais S., Carrier M., Pellerin M., and Perrault L.P. Closure of ventricular septal defects in the donor heart before transplantation: toward expanded acceptance criteria. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129 5 (2005) 1187-1188
35. Amin M.G., Wolf M.P., TenBrook Jr. J.A., et al. Expanded criteria donor grafts for deceased donor liver transplantation under the MELD system: a decision analysis. Liver Transpl 10 12 (2004) 1468-1475
36. Busuttil R.W., and Tanaka K. The utility of marginal donors in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 9 7 (2003) 651-663
37. Eisen H.J. Adverse outcomes from the use of older donor hearts in cardiac transplant recipients: the pros and cons of expanded donor criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol 43 9 (2004) 1562-1564
38. Johnston T.D., Thacker L.R., Jeon H., Lucas B.A., and Ranjan D. Sensitivity of expanded-criteria donor kidneys to cold ischaemia time. Clin Transpl 18 Suppl 12 (2004) 28-32
39. Pesavento T.E., Henry M.L., Falkenhain M.E., et al. Obese living kidney donors: short-term results and possible implications. Transplantation 68 10 (1999) 1491-1496
40. Modlin C.S., Goldfarb D.A., and Novick A.C. The use of expanded criteria cadaver and live donor kidneys for transplantation. Urol Clin North Am 28 4 (2001) 687-707
41. Alfrey E.J., Lee C.M., Scandling J.D., Pavlakis M., Markezich A.J., and Dafoe D.C. When should expanded criteria donor kidneys be used for. Transplantation 64 8 (1997) 1142-1146
42. Lee C.M., Carter J.T., Weinstein R.J., et al. Dual kidney transplantation: older donors for older recipients. J Am Coll Surg 189 1 (1999) 82-91 [discussion -2]
43. Tan J.C., Alfrey E.J., Dafoe D.C., Millan M.T., and Scandling J.D. Dual-kidney transplantation with organs from expanded criteria donors: a long-term follow-up. Transplantation 78 5 (2004) 692-696
44. Reiner M., Cornell D., and Howard R.J. Development of a successful non-heart-beating organ donation program. Prog Transplant 13 3 (2003) 225-231
45. Vathsala A. Improving cadaveric organ donation rates in kidney and liver transplantation in Asia. Transplant Proc 36 7 (2004) 1873-1875