Advanced 2-dimensional quantitative coronary angiographic analysis for prediction of fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary stenoses

Journal of Thoracic Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 217-223

  Opolski, Maksymilian P ^a   Pregowski, Jerzy ^a   Kruk, Mariusz ^b   Kepka, Cezary ^b   Staruch, Adam D ^c   Witkowski, Adam ^a  

^a Department of Interventional Cardiology and Angiology ^*  (Poland)

^b INSTITUTE OF CARDIOLOGY   (Poland)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Coronary angiography; Coronary artery disease; Coronary computed tomography angiography; Fractional flow reserve

Indexed keywords

GLYCERYL TRINITRATE; IOMEPROL; METOPROLOL;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY CIRCUMFLEX BRANCH; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HUMAN; LEFT ANTERIOR DESCENDING CORONARY ARTERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMAL LUMEN DIAMETER; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES;

AGED; AREA UNDER CURVE; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84903770952     PISSN: 08835993     EISSN: 15360237     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000058     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Achenbach S, Narula J. Coronary CT angiography: from sensitivity to specificity. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4: 1227-1229.
2. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden: results from the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial nuclear substudy. Circulation. 2008; 117:1283-1291. (Pubitemid 351365675)
3. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503-1516. (Pubitemid 46588415)
4. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary angiography. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213-224.
5. Legutko J, Jakala J, Mrevlje B, et al. Fractional flow reserveguided myocardial revascularization. Post Kardiol Interw. 2011;7:228-241.
6. Yong AS, Ng AC, Brieger D, et al. Three-dimensional and two-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography, and their prediction of reduced fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:345-353.
7. Jaffe R, Halon DA, Roguin A, et al. A Poiseuille-based coronary angiographic index for prediction of fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:862-865.
8. Choi JH, Min JK, Labounty TM, et al. Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:1149-1157.
9. Ehara S, Kobayashi Y, Yoshiyama M, et al. Spotty calcification typifies the culprit plaque in patients with acute myocardial infarction: an intravascular ultrasound study. Circulation. 2004;110:3424-3429. (Pubitemid 39602220)
10. Sun J, Zhang Z, Lu B, et al. Identification and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparison of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:748-754. (Pubitemid 351304521)
11. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:1478-1492.
12. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.
13. Hachamovitch R, Di Carli MF. Nuclear cardiology will remain the "gatekeeper" over CT angiography. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:634-644. (Pubitemid 47370878)
14. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:636-643.
15. Fischer JJ, Samady H, McPherson JA, et al. Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity. Am J Cardiol. 2002;90:210-215. (Pubitemid 34804552)
16. Christou MA, Siontis GC, Katritsis DG, et al. Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 2007;99:450-456. (Pubitemid 46215544)
17. Kern MJ, Lerman A, Bech JW, et al. Physiological assessment of coronary artery disease in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation. 2006;114:1321-1341. (Pubitemid 44402059)
18. Badeer HS. Hemodynamics for medical students. Adv Physiol Educ. 2001;25:44-52.
19. Li M, Zhang J, Pan J, et al. Coronary stenosis: morphologic index characterized by using CT angiography correlates with fractional flow reserve and is associated with hemodynamic status. Radiology. 2013. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1148/radiol.13122550.
20. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA. 2012;308:1237-1245.
21. Min JK, Koo BK, Erglis A, et al. Usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms for intermediate stenoses confirmed by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol. 2012; 110:971-976.