Microstructural analysis of the adhesion mechanism between old concrete substrate and UHPFC

Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 18, 2014, Pages 1846-1864

  Tayeh, Bassam A ^a   Abu Bakar, B H ^b   Megat Johari, M A ^b   Zeyad, A M ^c  

^a ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY OF GAZA   (Palestine)

^b SCHOOL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING   (Malaysia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Yemen)

Author keywords

bond strength; microstructure; silica fume; substrate; UHPFC

Indexed keywords

BOND STRENGTH (MATERIALS); FIBER REINFORCED MATERIALS; MICROSTRUCTURE; REINFORCED CONCRETE; REPAIR; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SILICA FUME; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TENSILE TESTING; X RAY SPECTROSCOPY;

ENERGY DISPERSIVE X RAY SPECTROSCOPY; FIBER-REINFORCED CONCRETES; INTERFACIAL TRANSITION ZONE; MICROSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; REPAIRED CONCRETE STRUCTURES; SUBSTRATE SURFACE PREPARATION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL SURFACE; UHPFC;

SUBSTRATES;

ADHESION; BEND STRENGTH; COMPOSITES; CONCRETE; MICROSTRUCTURE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SILICA; TENSILE TESTS;

EID: 84903754399     PISSN: 01694243     EISSN: 15685616     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01694243.2014.925386     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Mather B, Warner J. Why do concrete repairs fail? Interview held at University of Wisconsin, Madison Engineering Professional Development, Madison, WI; 2003 [cited 2013 January]. Available from: http://epdwebengrwiscedu/AEC- Articles/07-Concrete-Repair-texthtml
2. Sanchez-Silva M, Klutke G-A, Rosowsky DV. Life-cycle performance of structures subject to multiple deterioration mechanisms. Struct. Saf. 2011; 33: 206-217.
3. Espeche AD, León J. Estimation of bond strength envelopes for old-to-new concrete interfaces based on a cylinder splitting test. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011; 25: 1222-1235.
4. Tayeh BA, Abu Bakar BH, Megat Johari MA. Mechanical properties of old concrete-UHPFC interface. Paper presented at: The International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting III (ICCRRR 2012); 2012 September 2-5; Cape Town, South Africa.
5. Gorst N, Clark L. Effects of thaumasite on bond strength of reinforcement in concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2003; 25: 1089-1094.
6. Santos PMD, Julio ENBS. Factors affecting bond between new and old concrete. ACI Mater. J. 2011; 108: 449.
7. Tayeh BA, Abu Bakar BH, Megat Johari MA, Voo YL. Utilization of ultra-high performance fibre concrete (UHPFC) for rehabilitation-a review. Procedia Eng. 2013; 54: 525-538.
8. Austin S, Robins P, Pan Y. Tensile bond testing of concrete repairs. Mater. Struct. 1995; 28: 249-259.
9. Bissonnette B, Nuta A, Morency M, Marchand J, Vaysburd A. Concrete repair and interfacial bond: influence of surface preparation. Paper presented at: The International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting II (ICCRRR 2009); 2009 November 24-26; Cape Town, South Africa.
10. Tayeh BA, Abu Bakar BH, Megat Johari MA, Voo YL. Mechanical and permeability properties of the interface between normal concrete substrate and ultra high performance fiber concrete overlay. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012; 36: 538-548.
11. ASTM-C150/C150M. Standard specification for portland cement. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 2009.
12. ASTM-C230M. Standard specification for fow table for use in tests of hydraulic cement. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 1998.
13. Tayeh BA, Abu Bakar BH, Megat Johari MA, Ratnam MM. The relationship between substrate roughness parameters and bond strength of ultra high-performance fiber concrete. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2013; 27: 1790-1810.
14. Van Zijl G, Stander H. SHCC repair overlays for RC: Interfacial bond characterization and modelling. Paper presented at: The International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting II (ICCRRR 2009); 2009 November 24-26; Cape Town, South Africa.
15. Tayeh BA. Characterization of the interfacial bond between old concrete substrate and ultra high performance fiber concrete repair composite. Mater. Struct. 2013; 46: 743-753.
16. ASTM-C4541. Standard test method for pull-off strength of coatings using portable adhesion testers. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 1992.
17. Hindo KR. In-place bond testing and surface preparation of concrete. Concr. Int. 1990; 12: 46-48.
18. ASTM-C496. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete. West Conshohocken (PA): American Society for Testing and Materials; 1996.
19. Li G. A new way to increase the long-term bond strength of new-to-old concrete by the use of fly ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003; 33: 799-806.
20. Li G, Xie H, Xiong G. Transition zone studies of new-to-old concrete with different binders. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2001; 23: 381-387.
21. Abbasnia R, Khanzadi M, Ahmadi J. Mortar mix proportions and free shrinkage effect on bond strength between substrate and repair concrete. Paper presented at: The International Conference on Concrete Repair, Rehabilitation and Retrofitting II (ICCRRR 2012); 2009 November 24-26; Cape Town, South Africa.
22. Momayez A, Ehsani MR, Ramezanianpour AA, Rajaie H. Comparison of methods for evaluating bond strength between concrete substrate and repair materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005; 35: 748-757.
23. Tayeh BA, Abu Bakar BH, Megat Johari MA. Flexural strength behavior of composite UHPFC-existing concrete. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013; 701: 32-36.
24. Santos PMD, Júlio ENBS, Silva VD. Correlation between concrete-to-concrete bond strength and the roughness of the substrate surface. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007; 21: 1688-1695.
25. Júlio ENBS, Branco FAB, Silva VD. Concrete-to-concrete bond strength. Influence of the roughness of the substrate surface. Constr. Build. Mater. 2004; 18: 675-681.
26. Chynoweth G, Stankie RR, Allen WL, Anderson RR, Babcock WN, Barlow P, Bartholomew JJ, Bergemann GO, Bullock RE, Constantino FJ. Concrete repair guide. ACI Commit. Concr. Rep. Manual. 1996; 546: 287-327.
27. Xiong G, Liu J, Li G, Xie H. A way for improving interfacial transition zone between concrete substrate and repair materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002; 32: 1877-1881.
28. Bonaldo E, Barros JAO, Lourenço PB. Bond characterization between concrete substrate and repairing SFRC using pull-off testing. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2005; 25: 463-474.
29. Rilem T. 116-PCD: permeability of concrete as a criterion of its durability. Mater. Struct. 1999; 32: 174-179.
30. Sprinkel MM, Ozyildirim C. Evaluation of high performance concrete overlays placed on Route 60 over Lynnhaven Inlet in Virginia. Charlottesville: Virginia Transportation Research Council; 2000.
31. Charron JP, Denarié E, Brühwiler E. Permeability of ultra high performance fiber reinforced concretes (UHPFRC) under high stresses. Mater. Struct. 2007; 40: 269-277.
32. Vivekanandam K, Patnaikuni I. Transition zone in high performance concrete during hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 1997; 27: 817-823.
33. Tayeh BA, Abu Bakar BH, Megat Johari MA, Zeyad AM. The role of silica fume in the adhesion of concrete restoration systems. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013; 626: 265-269.
34. Goldman A, Bentur A. The influence of microfillers on enhancement of concrete strength. Cem. Concr. Res. 1993; 23: 962-972.
35. Mangat P, Catley D. A novel low voltage heating system for curing and protection of early age concrete. Concr. Plant Int. 2005; 4: 106-112.
36. Gerwick BC. Construction of prestressed concrete structures. New York (NY): Wiley; 1993. p. 91-94.
37. Erdem T, Turanli L, Erdogan T. Setting time: an important criterion to determine the length of the delay period before steam curing of concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2003; 33: 741-745.