A usability evaluation of an electronic health record system for nursing documentation used in the municipality healthcare services in Norway

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 8527 LNCS, Issue , 2014, Pages 690-699

  Vatnøy, Torunn Kitty ^a   Vabo, Grete ^a   Fossum, Mariann ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

Author keywords

Electronic Health Record; Nursing documentation; Nursing process; Usability evaluation

Indexed keywords

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD(EHR) SYSTEM; GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES (GUI); HEALTHCARE SERVICES; NURSING DOCUMENTATION; NURSING PROCESS; USABILITY EVALUATION;

NURSING;

EID: 84903731133     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07293-7_67     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Helse-og omsorgsdepartementet, [Norwegain Ministry of Health and Care Services].: Forskrift om pasientjournal [Regulation on patientrecord]. FOR-2000-12-21-nr.1385 (2000)
2. Helse-og omsorgsdepartementet, [Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services].: Lov om Helsepersonel [Act Relating to Health personell]. LOV-1999-07-02-64 (1999)
3. Helse-og omsorgsdepartementet, [Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services].: Samhandlingsreformen: Rett behandling - på rett sted - til rett tid Samhandlingsreformen [The Coordination Reform. Proper treatment - at the right place and right time.]. St.meld. nr. 47 Oslo (2009)
4. Lobach, D.F., Detmer D.E.: Research Challenges for Electronic Health Records. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 32(5 suppl.), 104-111 (2007)
5. Kellermann, A., Jones, S.S.: What It Will Take To Achieve The As-Yet-Unfulfilled Promises Of Health Information Technology. Health Affairs At the intersection of Health Care and Policy 32(1), 63-68 (2013)
6. Delone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9-30 (2003)
7. Berg, M.: Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatic 64(2-3), 143-156 (2001)
8. Lærum, O.D.: Den vanskelige journalen The difficult patient record]. Tidsskr Nor Legeforening 132, 1929-1931 (2012)
9. Häyrinen, K., Lammintakanen, J., Saranto, K.: Evaluation of electronic nursing documentation - Nursing process model and standardized terminologies as keys to visible and transparent nursing. International Journal of Medical Informatics 79(8), 554-564 (2010)
10. Petter, S., McLean, E.R.: A meta-analytic assessment of the DeLone and McLean IS success model: An examination of IS success at the individual level. Information & Management 46(3), 159-166 (2009)
11. Kushniruk, A.W., Patel, V.L.: Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatic 37(1), 56-76 (2004)
12. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H.: Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. John Wiley&Sons, Inc. (2002)
13. Kushniruk, A.: Evaluation in the design of health information systems: application of approaches emerging from usability engineering. Computers in Biology and Medicine 32(3), 141-1498 (2002)
14. Ludwick, D., Doucette, J.: Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: Lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. International Journal of Medical Informatics 78(1), 22-31 (2009)
15. Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., Mahler, C.: IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: a fit framework and a case study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 6(1), 3 (2006)
16. Norsk helsenett [The Norwegian Health Network]: Leverandører [List of vendors of electronoc healtecare system] (2008-2014), http://www.nhn.no/ meldingsutbredelse-i-helsesektoren/leverandoerer
17. Nightingale F. translated by Melbye, : Notater om sykepleie[Notes on Nursing]. Universitetsforlaget (1997)
18. Kärkkäinen, O., Bondas, T., Eriksson, K.: Documentation of Individualized Patient Care: a qualitative metasynthesis. Nursing Ethics 12(2), 123-132 (2005)
19. Fossum, M., Ehnfors, M., Fruhling, A., Ehreanberg, A.: An Evaluation of the Usability of a Computerized Decision Support System for Nursing Homes. Applied Clinical Informatics, 420-436 (2011)
20. Mills, J., Chamberlain-Salaun, J., Henry, R., Sando, J., Summerset, G.: Nurses in Australian acute care settings: experiences with and outcomes of e-health. An Integrative Review 3 (2013)
21. Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., Nykänen, P.: Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Medical Informatics 77(5), 291-304 (2008)
22. Vabo, G.: Domumetasjon av sykepleie, Et aksjonsforskingsprosjekt i Setersdal [Domumetasjon of Nursing, An action research project in Setersdal]. Senter for Omsorgsforsking. Nr.1/2013: p. 1-99 (2013)
23. Keenan, G., Yakel, E., Dunn Lopez, K., Tschannen, D., Ford, Y.B.: Challenges to nurses' efforts of retrieving, documenting, and communicating patient care information. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20(2), 245-251 (2013)
24. Ash, J.S., Bates, D.W.: Factors and Forces Affecting EHR System Adoption: Report of a 2004 ACMI Discussion. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 12(1), 8-12 (2005)
25. Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., Kawasumi, Y.: The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Time Efficiency of Physicians and Nurses: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 12(5), 505-516 (2005)
26. Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., Mahler, C., Kandert, M., Luther, G., Hoppe, B., Eichstadter, R.: Factors Affecting and Affected by User Acceptance of Computer-Based Nursing Documentation: Results of a Two-Year Study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 10(1), 69-84 (2003)
27. Nielsen, J., Landauer, T.K.: A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the INTERACT 1993 and CHI 1993 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 206-213. ACM, Amsterdam (1993)
28. Polson, P.G., Lewis, C., Rieman, J., Wharton, C.: Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 36(5), 741-773 (1992)
29. Reinking, D.: Electronic Literacy. University of Georgia (1994)
30. Bastien, J.M.C.: Usability testing: a review of some methodological and technical aspects of the method. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(4), e18-e23 (2010)
31. Graneheim, U.H., Lundman, B.: Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24(2), 105-112 (2004)
32. Kawamoto, K., Houlihan, C.A., Balas, E.A., Lobach, D.F.: Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. British Medical Journal 330(7494), 765-768 (2005)