Discursive barriers and cross-scale forest governance in central Kalimantan, Indonesia

Ecology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Gallemore, Caleb T ^a   Rut Dini Prasti, H ^b   Moeliono, Moira ^b  

^a NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY RESEARCH   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Cross scale governance; Discourse; Indonesia; Policy network analysis

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSION; DEFORESTATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FOREST MANAGEMENT; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; GREENHOUSE GAS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; POLICY ANALYSIS;

CENTRAL KALIMANTAN; INDONESIA;

EID: 84903725021     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-06418-190218     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Adger, W. N., K. Brown, and E. L. Tompkins. 2005. The political economy of cross-scale networks in resource co-management. Ecology and Society 10(2): 9. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol10/iss2/art9.
2. Aurora, O. L. 2011. Kalimantan Tengah akan selesaikan Strategi Daerah REDD+ dalam 2 bulan. Kabar Hutan. Kementerian Kehutanan Republik Indonesia. [online] URL: http://blog. cifor. org/3789/kalimantan-tengah-akan-selesaikan-strategi-daerah-redddalam-2-bulan/#. UWrLmMoYlhA.
3. Bartley, T. 2010. Transnational regulation in practice: the limits of forest and labor standards certification in Indonesia. Business and Politics 12(3): 7. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2202/1469-3569. 1321.
4. Bartley, T. 2011. Transnational governance as the layering of rules: intersections of public and private standards. Theoretical Inquiries in Law 12: 517-542.
5. Becker, C. D., and K. Ghimire. 2003. Synergy between traditional ecological knowledge and conservation science supports forest preservation in Ecuador. Conservation Ecology 8(1): 1. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol8/iss1/art1/.
6. Berkes, F., and C. Folke. 2002. Back to the future: ecosystem dynamics and local knowledge. Pages 121-146 in L. H. Gunderson and C. S. Holling, editors. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, D. C., USA.
7. Biermann, F., and A. Gupta. 2011. Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: a research framework. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1856-1864. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ecolecon. 2011. 04. 008.
8. Bodin, Ö., B. Crona, and H. Ernstson. 2006. Social networks in natural resource management: What is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society 11(2): r2. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol11/iss2/resp2/.
9. Bodin, Ö., and B. I. Crona. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19(3): 366-374. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. gloenvcha. 2009. 05. 002.
10. Bodin, Ö., S. Ramirez-Sanchez, H. Ernstson, and C. Prell. 2011. A social relational approach to natural resource governance. Pages 3-28 in Ö. Bodin and C. Prell, editors. Social networks and natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1017/CBO9780511894985. 002.
11. Brass, D. J. 1984. Being in the right place: a structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 29(4): 518-539. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/2392937.
12. Brockhaus, M., and A. Angelsen. 2012. Seeing REDD+ through 4Is: a political economy framework. Pages 15-30 in A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, and L. V. Verchot, editors. Analysing REDD+: challenges and choices. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
13. Brockhaus, M., and M. Di Gregorio. 2012. A brief overview: component 1 on national REDD+ policies and processes. CIFOR Infobrief, Volume 13. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
14. Brockhaus, M., M. Di Gregorio, and S. Mardiah. 2013. Governing the design of national REDD+: an analysis of the power of agency. Forest Policy and Economics, in press. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. forpol. 2013. 07. 003.
15. Brookfield, H., and Y. Byron. 1990. Deforestation and timber extraction in Borneo and the Malay Peninsula: the record since 1965. Global Environmental Change 1(1): 42-56. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/0959-3780(90)90006-U.
16. Brown, K. 2003. Three challenges for a real people-centred conservation. Global Ecology and Biogeography 12(2): 89-92. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1046/j. 1466-822X. 2003. 00327. x.
17. Bruenig, E. F. 1987. The forest ecosystem: tropical and boreal. Ambio 16(2/3): 68-79.
18. Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and closure: an introduction to social capital. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
19. Butler, R. A. 2010. Borneo province selected for Indonesia's first pilot under REDD program. Mongabay, 30 December. [online] URL: http://news. mongabay. com/2010/1229-redd_pilot_central_kalimantan. html.
20. Butler, R. A. 2013. Australia terminates landmark REDD+ project in Borneo. Mongabay, 3 July. [online] URL: http://news. mongabay. com/2013/0703-kfcp-to-end-ausaid. html.
21. Cash, D. W., W. N. Adger, F. Berkes, P. Garden, L. Lebel, P. Olsson, L. Pritchard, and O. Young. 2006. Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society 11(2): 8. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol11/iss2/art8/.
22. Cortez, R., R. Saines, B. Griscom, M. Martin, D. De Deo, G. Fishbein, J. Kerkering, and D. Marsh. 2010. A nested approach to REDD+: structuring effective and transparent incentive mechanisms for REDD+ implementation at multiple scales. The Nature Conservancy and Baker and McKenzie, Washington, D. C., USA. [online] URL: http://www. theredddesk. org/sites/default/files/resources/pdf/2010/TNC_june_2010_A_nested_approach_to_REDD. pdf.
23. Cranmer, S. J., and B. A. Desmarais. 2011. Inferential network analysis with exponential random graph models. Political Analysis 19(1): 66-86. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1093/pan/mpq037.
24. Creagh, S. 2009. Governor says REDD scheme could save Borneo forests. Reuters, 29 May. [online] URL: http://www. reuters. com/article/2009/05/29/us-indonesia-forests-kalimantan-sbidUSTRE54S1DT20090529.
25. Crona, B., and K. Hubacek. 2010. The right connections: how do social networks lubricate the machinery of natural resource governance? Ecology and Society 15(4): 18. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol15/iss4/art18/.
26. Di Gregorio, M. 2012. Networking in environmental movement organisation coalitions: interest, values or discourse? Environmental Politics 21(1): 1-25. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/09644016. 2011. 643366.
27. Dove, M. R. 2006. Indigenous people and environmental politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 35: 191-208. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1146/annurev. anthro. 35. 081705. 123235.
28. Drew, J. A. 2005. Use of traditional ecological knowledge in marine conservation. Conservation Biology 19(4): 1286-1293. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1111/j. 1523-1739. 2005. 00158. x.
29. Dryzek, J. S., and H. Stevenson. 2011. Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics 70(11): 1865-1874. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ecolecon. 2011. 01. 021.
30. Ernstson, H., S. Barthel, E. Andersson, and S. T. Borgström. 2010. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: the case of Stockholm. Ecology and Society 15(4): 28. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol15/iss4/art28/.
31. Forest Peoples Programme and Pusaka. 2012. Unfulfilled promises: a note on the KFCP's recent attempts to respect the rights of affected communities on the Kapuas River, Central Kalimantan. Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK. [online] URL: http://www. forestpeoples. org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2012/09/kfcp-commitments-after-year-promises-final. pdf.
32. Forest Peoples Programme, Pusaka, and Yayasan Petak Danum Kalimantan Tengah. 2011. Central Kalimantan: REDD+ and the Kalimantan Forest Carbon Partnership (KFCP). Forest Peoples Programme, Moreton-in-Marsh, UK. [online] URL: http://www. forestpeoples. org/sites/fpp/files/publication/2011/10/central-kalimantanbriefing-2. pdf.
33. Forest Trends and Climate Focus. 2011. Nested projects and REDD+: an overview of issues and options. Forest Trends and Climate Focus, Washington, D. C., USA. [online] URL: http://www. climatefocus. com/documents/files/nesting_projects_and_redd_briefing_document. pdf.
34. Foucault, M. 1972. The archaeology of knowledge. Translated by A. M. S. Smith. Pantheon Books, New York, New York, USA.
35. Freeman, L. C. 1978-1979. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1(3): 215-239. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
36. Friends of the Earth Australia, Aid/Watch, WALHI, and S. Petani. 2009. Report: what a scam! Australia's REDD offsets for Copenhagen. Friends of the Earth Australia, Sydney, Australia.
37. Galudra, G., M. Van Noordwijk, S. Suyanto, I. Sardi, U. Pradhan, and D. Catacutan. 2011. Hot spots of confusion: contested policies and competing carbon claims in the peatlands of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. International Forestry Review 13 (4): 431-441. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1505/146554811798811380.
38. Gerhardinger, L. C., E. A. S. Godoy, and P. J. S. Jones. 2009. Local ecological knowledge and the management of marine protected areas in Brazil. Ocean & Coastal Management 52(3-4): 154-165. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ocecoaman. 2008. 12. 007.
39. Global Administrative Areas. 2012. GADM Database of Global Administrative Areas. Version 2. 0. [online] URL: http://www. gadm. org/.
40. Goodreau, S. M., M. S. Handcock, D. R. Hunter, C. T. Butts, and M. Morris. 2008. A statnet tutorial. Journal of Statistical Software 24(9): 1-27.
41. Gubernur Kalimantan Tengah. 2012b. Tentang rencana aksi daerah penurunan emisi gas rumah kaca (RAD-GRK). Peraturan Gubenur Kalimantan Tengah nomor 36 tahun 2012. Government of Central Kalimantan, Palangkaraya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www. unorcid. org/upload/doc_lib/20130207132847_RAD%20GRK%20grey. pdf.
42. Gubernur Kalimantan Tengah. 2012a. Tentang strategi daerah dan rencana aksi reducing emissions from degradation and deforestation-plus provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Peraturan Gubernur Kalimantan Tengah nomor 10 tahun 2012. Government of Central Kalimantan, Palangkaraya, Central Kalimantan. [online] URL: http://jdih. kalteng. go. id/uploads/prokum-2012080309470187. pdf.
43. Hahn, T., P. Olsson, C. Folke, and K. Johansson. 2006. Trustbuilding, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology 34(4): 573-592. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s10745-006-9035-z.
44. Handcock, M. S., D. R. Hunter, C. T. Butts, S. M. Goodreau, and M. Morris. 2003. Statnet: software tools for the statistical modeling of network data. Statnet Project. R package version 2. 0. http://statnet. org/.
45. Harian Umum Tabengan. 2013. Teras: pusat sarana komunikasi iklim untuk dunia. Harian Umum Tabengan, 4 September. [online] URL: http://unorcid. org/index. php/redd-in-the-news/from-the-provinces/188-teras-pusat-sarana-komunikasi-iklim-untukdunia.
46. Holling, C. S. 2001. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4(5): 390-405. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s10021-001-0101-5.
47. Holling, C. S., L. H. Gunderson, and G. D. Peterson. 2002. Sustainability and panarchies. Pages 63-102 in L. H. Gunderson and C. S. Holling, editors. Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, D. C., USA.
48. Hunter, D. R., S. M. Goodreau, and M. S. Handcock. 2008b. Goodness of fit of social network models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 103(481): 248-258. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1198/016214507000000446.
49. Hunter, D. R., M. S. Handcock, C. T. Butts, S. M. Goodreau, and M. Morris. 2008a. ergm: a package to fit, simulate and diagnose exponential-family models for networks. Journal of Statistical Software 24(3): nihpa54860.
50. Jaya, A., T. Inoue, S. H. Limin, U. Darung, and I. S. Banuwa. 2010. Microclimate of developed peatland of the mega rice project in Central Kalimantan. Journal of Tropical Soils 15(1): 63-71.
51. Jessup, B. 2010. Plural and hybrid environmental values: a discourse analysis of the wind energy conflict in Australia and the United Kingdom. Environmental Politics 19(1): 21-44. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/09644010903396069.
52. Kalteng, W. 2013a. REDD+; waktunya belajar kepada rakyat. Wahli Kalimantan Tengah, Palangkaraya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://walhikalteng. org/redd-waktunyabelajar-kepada-rakyat/.
53. Kalteng, W. 2013b. Skema REDD akan menimbulkan masalah baru. Wahli Kalimantan Tengah, Palangkaraya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://walhikalteng. org/skema-redd-akan-menimbulkan-masalah-baru.
54. Koh, L. P., J. Miettinen, S. C. Liew, and J. Ghazoul. 2011. Remotely sensed evidence of tropical peatland conversion to oil palm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(12): 5127-5132. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 1018776108.
55. Kompasiana. 2011. Menjaga keutuhan dan kelestarian hutan di kawasan REDD. Kompasiana. 7 June. [online] URL: http://green. kompasiana. com/penghijauan/2011/06/07/menjaga-keutuhandan-kelestarian-hutan-di-kawasan-redd-369427. html.
56. Korhonen-Kurki, K., M. Brockhaus, A. E. Duchelle, S. Atmadja, and P. T. Thuy. 2012. Multiple levels and multiple challenges for REDD+. Pages 91-110 in A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, and L. V. Verchot, editors. Analysing REDD+: challenges and choices. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
57. Krackhardt, D. 1990. Assessing the political landscape: structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2): 342-369. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2307/2393394.
58. Kuhn, T. S. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions. Third edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
59. Lebel, L., J. M. Anderies, B. Campbell, C. Folke, S. Hatfield-Dodds, T. P. Hughes, and J. Wilson. 2006. Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 11(1): 19 [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol11/iss1/art19/.
60. Li, T. M. 2007. The will to improve: governmentality, development, and the practice of politics. Duke University Press, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1215/9780822389781.
61. Luttrell, C., L. Loft, M. F. Gebara, D. Kweka, M. Brockhaus, A. Angelsen, and W. D. Sunderlin. 2013. Who should benefit from REDD+? Rationales and realities. Ecology and Society 18(4): 52. http://dx. doi. org/10. 5751/ES-05834-180452.
62. McCarthy, J. F. 2001. Decentralisation and forest management in Kapuas district, Central Kalimantan. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor, Indonesia.
63. McCarthy, J. F. 2004. Changing to gray: decentralization and the emergence of volatile socio-legal configurations in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. World Development 32(7): 1199-1223. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. worlddev. 2004. 02. 002.
64. McDermott, C. L., K. Levin, and B. Cashore. 2011. Building the forest-climate bandwagon: REDD+ and the logic of problem amelioration. Global Environmental Politics 11(3): 85-103. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1162/GLEP_a_00070.
65. Moller, H., F. Berkes, P. O'Brian Lyver, and M. Kislalioglu. 2004. Combining science and traditional ecological knowledge: monitoring populations for co-management. Ecology and Society 9(3): 2. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol9/iss3/art2/.
66. Morris, M., M. S. Handcock, and D. R. Hunter. 2008. Specification of exponential-family random graph models: terms and computational aspects. Journal of Statistical Software 24 (4): 1548-7660. [online] URL: http://www. jstatsoft. org/v24/i04/paper.
67. North, D. C. 2005. Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
68. Nygren, A. 1999. Local knowledge in the environmentdevelopment discourse: from dichotomies to situated knowledges. Critique of Anthropology 19(3): 267-288. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1177/0308275X9901900304.
69. Olsson, P., C. Folke, V. Galaz, T. Hahn, and L. Schultz. 2007. Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve, Sweden. Ecology and Society 12(1): 28. [online] URL: http://www. ecology andsociety. org/vol12/iss1/art28/>.
70. Olsson, P., C. Folke, and T. Hahn. 2004. Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society 9(4): 2. [online] URL: http://www. ecologyandsociety. org/vol9/iss4/art2/.
71. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1017/CBO9780511807763.
72. Pearse, R., and J. Dehm. 2011. In the REDD: Australia's carbon offset project in Central Kalimantan. Friends of the Earth International, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [online] URL: http://www. foei. org/en/what-we-do/climate-biodiversity-finance/latest-news-1/resolveuid/bc153d36bd82e8c371e87413e92c265a.
73. Pedroni, L., M. Dutschke, C. Streck, and M. E. Porrúa. 2009. Creating incentives for avoiding further deforestation: the nested approach. Climate Policy 9(2): 207-220. http://dx. doi. org/10. 3763/cpol. 2008. 0522.
74. R Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
75. Raymond, C. M., I. Fazey, M. S. Reed, L. C. Stringer, G. M. Robinson, and A. C. Evely. 2010. Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management 91(8): 1766-1777. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. jenvman. 2010. 03. 023.
76. Robins, G. L., P. Pattison, Y. Kalish, and D. Lusher. 2007. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 29: 173-191. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. socnet. 2006. 08. 002.
77. Ross, M. L. 2001. Timber booms and institutional breakdown in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1017/CBO9780511510359.
78. Sabiham, S. 2004. Ecological issues of the mega-rice project in Indonesia: a case study of development in Central Kalimantan. Pages 73-87 in H. Furukawa, editor. Ecological destruction, health, and development: advancing Asian paradigms. Volume 8. Trans Pacific Press, Victoria, Australia.
79. Satuan Tugas REDD+. 2012. Kalimantan tengah meluncurkan strategi daerah REDD+. Satuan REDD+, Jakarta, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www. satgasreddplus. org/aktivitas/rencanaaksi-strategi-daerah-redd-kalimantan-tengah.
80. Schmelzkopf, K. 2002. Incomensurability, land use, and the right to space: community gardens in New York City. Urban Geography 23(4): 323-343.
81. Sekretariat Bersama REDD+. 2011a. Archive for "kegiatan rapat program REDD+ Kalteng" category. Sekretariat Bersama REDD+, Palangkaraya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://reddplussupportingofficekalteng. wordpress. com/category/kegiatan-rapat-program-redd-kalteng/.
82. Sekretariat Bersama REDD+. 2011b. Archive for "laporan kegiatan kantor pendukung REDD+ Kalteng" category. Sekretariat Bersama REDD+, Palangkaraya, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://reddplussupportingofficekalteng. wordpress. com/category/laporan-kegiatan-kantor-pendukung-reddkalteng/.
83. Simamora, A. P. 2011. Indigenous groups call for halt to REDD pilot project. Jakarta Post, 25 June. [online] URL: http://www. thejakartapost. com/news/2011/06/25/indigenous-groups-call-haltredd-pilot-project. html.
84. Sumargo W., S. G. Nanggara, F. A. Nainggolan, and I. Apriani. 2009. Potret keadaan hutan Indonesia: periode tahun 2000-2009. Forest Watch Indonesia, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://fwi. or. id/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/PHKI_2000-2009_FWI_lowres. pdf.
85. Suyanto, N. K., I. Sardi, Y. Buana, and M. van Noordwijk. 2009. Analysis of local livelihoods from past to present in the Central Kalimantan ex-mega rice project area. Working Paper No. 94. World Agroforestry Centre, Southeast Asia, Bogor, Indonesia. http://dx. doi. org/10. 5716/WP16453. pdf.
86. Thomas, D. S. G., and C. Twyman. 2004. Good or bad rangeland? Hybrid knowledge, science, and local understandings of vegetation dynamics in the Kalahari. Land Degradation & Development 15(3): 215-231. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/ldr. 610.
87. Tim Penyusun Sosialisasi Strada REDD+ Kalimantan Tengah. 2013. Kick off sosialisasi strategid daerah (strada) pelaksanaan REDD+ Kalimantan Tengah. Government of the Province of Kalimantan Tengah, Palangkaraya, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www. satgasreddplus. org/download/Handout-Peserta-Kick-Off-Sosialisasi-Strada-REDD+Kalteng. pdf.
88. To, P. X., R. O'Sullivan, J. Olander, S. Hawkins, P. Q. Hung, and N. Kitamura. 2012. REDD+ in Vietnam: integrating national and subnational approaches. Forest Trends Association and Climate Focus, Washington, D. C., USA.
89. Trainor, S. F. 2006. Realms of value: conflicting natural resource values and incommensurability. Environmental Values 15(1): 3-29. http://dx. doi. org/10. 3197/096327106776678951.
90. Wickham, H. 2009. ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York, New York, USA. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/978-0-387-98141-3.