Research data management services in academic research libraries and perceptions of librarians

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 84-90

  Tenopir, Carol ^a   Sandusky, Robert J ^b   Allard, Suzie ^a   Birch, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b Richard Daley College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903693418     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lisr.2013.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Association of Research Libraries To stand the test of time: Long-term stewardship of digital data sets in science and engineering 2006, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C., Retrieved from http://arl.nonprofitsoapbox.com/storage/documents/publications/digital-data-report-2006.pdf.
2. Association of Research Libraries E-science and data support services: A study of ARL member institutions 2010, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, DC, Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/escience-report-2010.pdf.
3. Bach K., Schafer D., Enke N., Seeger B., Gemeinholzer B., Bendix J. A comparative evaluation of technical solutions for long-term data repositories in integrative biodiversity research. Ecological Informatics 2012, 11:16-24. 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2011.11.008.
4. Brown E. I know what you researched last summer: How academic librarians are supporting researchers in the management of data curation. The New Zealand Library & Information Management Journal 2010, 52(1):55-69. Retrieved from http://www.lianza.org.nz/sites/lianza.org.nz/files/nzlimj_vol_52_issue_no_1_oct_2010.pdf.
5. Brown S., Swan A. Researchers' use of academic libraries and their services: A report commissioned by the Research Information Network and the Consortium of Research Libraries 2007, Research Information Network and Consortium of Research Libraries in the British Isles, London, UK, Retrieved from http://www.rin.ac.uk/our-work/using-and-accessing-information-resources/researchers-use-academic-libraries-and-their-serv.
6. Carlson's J. Demystifying the data interview: Developing a foundation for reference librarians to talk with researchers about their data. Reference Services Review 2012, 40(1):7-23. 10.1108/00907321211203603.
7. Cheek F.M., Bradigan P.S. Academic health sciences library research support. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2010, 98(2):167-171. 10.3163/1536-5050.98.2.011.
8. Corrall S., Keenan M.A., Afzal W. Bibliometrics and research data management services: Emerging trends in library support for research. Library Trends 2013, 61(3):636-674. 10.1353/lib.2013.0005.
9. Council on Library and Information Resources No brief candle: Reconceiving research libraries for the 21st century 2008, Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC, Retrieved from http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub142/pub142.pdf.
10. Creamer A., Morales M.E., Crespo J., Kafel D., Martin E.R. An assessment of needed competencies to promote the data curation and management librarianship of health sciences and science and technology librarians in New England. Journal of eScience Librarianship 2012, 1(1):18-26. 10.7191/jeslib.2012.1006.
11. Gabridge T. The last mile: The liaison role in curating science and engineering research data. Research Library Issues: A Bimonthly Report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 2009, 265:15-21. Retrieved from http://publications.arl.org/rli265/16.
12. Gold A. Cyberinfrastructure, data, and libraries, part 2: Libraries and the data challenge: Roles and actions for libraries. D-Lib Magazine 2007, 13(9/10). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september07/gold/09gold-pt2.html.
13. Government of Canada Tri-agency open access policy 2013, Retrieved from http://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/NSERC-CRSNG/policies-politiques/OpenAccessFAQ-LibreAccesFAQ_eng.asp#8.
14. Hey T., Hey J. E-science and its implications for the library community. Library Hi Tech 2006, 24(4):515-528. 10.1108/07378830610715383.
15. Hey T., Tansley S., Tolle K. The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery 2009, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/collaboration/fourthparadigm/4th_paradigm_book_complete_lr.pdf.
16. Hey T., Tansley S., Tolle K. Jim Gray on eScience: A transformed scientific method. The fourth paradigm: Data-intensive scientific discovery 2009, xix-xxxiii. Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/collaboration/fourthparadigm/4th_paradigm_book_complete_lr.pdf. T. Hey, S. Tansley, K. Tolle (Eds.).
17. Jones E. Reinventing science librarianship: Themes from the ARL-CNI forum. Research library issues: A bimonthly report from ARL, CNI, and SPARC 2009, 262:12-17. Retrieved from http://publications.arl.org/rli262/13.
18. Kuipers T., Van der Hoeven J. Insight into digital preservation of research output in Europe: Survey report (D3.4) 2009, PARSE.Insight, Didcot, UK, Retrieved from http://www.parse-insight.eu/downloads/PARSE-Insight_D3-4_SurveyReport_final_hq.pdf.
19. MacColl J. Library roles in university research assessment. LIBER Quarterly 2010, 20(2):152-168. Retrieved from http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/bitstream/10023/1677/1/MacColl2010LIBERQuarterly20LibraryRoles.pdf.
20. Markauskaite L., Kennan M.A., Richardson J., Aditomo A., Hellmers L. Investigating eResearch: Collaboration practices and future challenges. Collaborative and distributed e-research: Innovations in technologies, strategies and applications 2012, 1-33. 10.4018/978-1-4666-0125-3.ch001. A. Juan, T. Daradoumis, M. Roca, S. Grasman, J. Fauli (Eds.).
21. Newton M.P., Miller C.C., Bracke M.S. Librarian roles in institutional repository data set collecting: Outcomes of a research library task force. Collection Management 2010, 36(1):53-67. 10.1080/01462679.2011.530546.
22. Peters C., Dryden A.R. Assessing the academic library's role in campus-wide research data management: A first step at the University of Houston. Science & Technology Libraries 2011, 30(4):387-403. 10.1080/0194262X.2011.626340.
23. Potter W.G., Cook C., Kyrillidou M. ARL profiles: Research libraries 2010 2011, Association of Research Libraries, Washington, D.C., Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/storage/documents/publications/arl-profiles-report-2010.pdf.
24. Steinhart G., Saylor J., Albert P., Alpi K., Baxter P., Brown E., et al. Digital research data curation: Overview of issues, current activities, and opportunities for the Cornell University Library. A report of the Cornell University Library Data Working Group 2008, Retrieved from http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/bitstream/1813/10903/1/DaWG_WP_final.pdf.
25. Tenopir C., Birch B., Allard S. Academic libraries and research data services: Current practices and plans for the future 2012, (An ACRL white paper), Association of College and Research Libraries, Chicago, IL, Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/acrl/sites/ala.org.acrl/files/content/publications/whitepapers/Tenopir_Birch_Allard.pdf.
26. Tenopir C., Sandusky R.J., Allard S., Birch B. Academic librarians and research data services: Preparation and attitudes. IFLA Journal 2013, 39(1):70-78. 10.1177/0340035212473089.
27. University of Minnesota Libraries Funding agency and data management guidelines 2011, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN, Retrieved from https://www.lib.umn.edu/datamanagement/funding.