Enhancing ecosystem services for flood mitigation: A conservation strategy for peri-urban landscapes?

Ecology and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2014, Pages

  Barbedo, José ^a   Miguez, Marcelo ^a   van der Horst, Dan ^b   Marins, Monique ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Flood risk management; Land use adaptation; Peri urban landscapes; Water flow regulation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; CULTURAL LANDSCAPE; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOODING; FLOODPLAIN; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LANDSCAPE; PERIURBAN AREA; RISK ASSESSMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; WATER FLOW;

BRAZIL; PARATY BAY; RIO DE JANEIRO [BRAZIL];

EID: 84903689561     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-06482-190254     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Acharya, G. 2000. Approaches to valuing the hidden hydrological services of wetland ecosystems. Ecological Economics 35 (1): 63-74. [online] URL: http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0921800900001683.
2. American Society of Civil Engineers. 1969. Design and construction of sanitary and storm sewers. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, USA.
3. Andoh, R., and K. Iwugo. 2002. Sustainable urban drainage systems: a UK perspective. Pages 1-16 in E. W. Strecker, and W. C. Huber, editors. Global solutions for urban drainage. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1061/40644(2002)19.
4. Barnard, T, T. E. Barnard, A. W. Kuch, G. R. Thompson, S. Mudaliar, and B. C. Phillips. 2007. Evolution of an integrated 1D/2D modeling package for urban drainage. Computational Hydraulics International 18: 343-365.
5. Batker, D., M. Kocian, B. Lovell, J. Harrison-Cox. 2010. Flood protection in the Chealis River basin. Earth Economics, Tacoma, USA.
6. BMT WBM. 2009. Evaluating options for water sensitive urban design-a national guide. Joint Steering Committee for Water Sensitive Cities, Sydney, Australia.
7. Bonganha, C., N. Guiguer, S. Pereira, L. Oliveira, and M. Ribeiro. 2007. Conceitos e fundamentos da modelagem matemática para gerenciamento de recursos hídricos subterrâneos. Analytica 30: 116-120.
8. Boyer, T., and S. Polasky. 2004. Valuing urban wetlands, a review of non-market valuation studies. Wetlands 24-4: 744-755. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0744: VUWARO]2. 0. CO; 2.
9. Carpenter, S., H. Mooney, J. Agard, D. Capistrano, R. DeFries, S. Díaz, T. Dietz, A. Duraiappah, A. Oteng-Yeboah, H. Pereira, C. Perrings, W. Reid, J. Sarukhan, R. Scholes, and A. Whyte. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Pages 1305-1312 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 106(5). http://dx. doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 0808772106.
10. Corkindale, J. 2007. The potential role of market-based instruments in the economic optimisation of investment in flood risk management. UK Environment Agency, London, UK.
11. Cunge, J., F. Holly Jr, and A. Verwey. 1980. Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics. Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, London, UK.
12. Cury, I. 2002. A evolução urbana e fundiária de Parati do séc. XVII até o séc. XX, em face da adequação das normas de proteção de seu patrimônio cultural. Thesis. Faculdade da Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
13. De Groot, R., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L. Willemen. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7: 260-272. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ecocom. 2009. 10. 006.
14. Directorate-General Environment. 2011. Towards better environmental options for flood risk management. Directorate General Environment of the European Commission, Brussels, Belgium. [online] URL: http://ec. europa. eu/environment/water/water-framework/index_en. html.
15. Emerton, L. 2005. Values and rewards: counting and capturing ecosystem water services for sustainable development. World Conservation Union, Ecosystems and Livelihoods Group Asia. International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland. http://dx. doi. org/10. 2305/IUCN. CH. 2005. 12. en.
16. Global Environment Facility. 2011. Integrated management of the Ilha Grande Bay ecosystem (Project Document). Global Environment Facility, Washington, D. C., USA.
17. Haller, T. (editor). 2010. Disputing the floodplains. Institutional change and the politics of resource management in African wetlands. African Social Studies Series. Brill, Boston, USA. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1163/ej. 9789004185326. i-454.
18. Jha, A. K., R. Bloch, and J. Lamond. 2012. Cities and flooding: a guide to integrated urban flood risk management for the 21st Century. World Bank and Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery, Washington, D. C., USA. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1596/978-0-8213-8866-2.
19. Kloss, C., and C. Calarusse. 2006. Rooftops to rivers: green strategies for controlling stormwater and combined sewer overflows. Natural Resources Defense Council, Low Impact Development Center, and University of Maryland School of Public Policy, Maryland, USA. [online] URL: http://www. nrdc. org/water/pollution/rooftops/rooftops. pdf.
20. Kousky, S., S. Olmstead, M. Walls, A. Stern, and M. Macauley. 2011. The role of land use in adaptation to increased precipitation and flooding: a case study in Wisconsin's Lower Fox River basin. Resources for the future, Washington, D. C., USA.
21. Leis, H. 1995. Introdução à questão metodológica. in A. Diegues, editor. Conflitos sociais e meio ambiente: desafios políticos e conceituais. Instituto Brasileiro de Análises Sociais e Econômicas (IBASE), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
22. Liu, S., R. Costanza, S. Farber, and A. Troy. 2010. Valuing ecosystem services: theory, practice and the need for a transdisciplinary synthesis. Ecological Economics Reviews. 1185: 54-78.
23. Mascarenhas, F., and M. Miguez. 2002. Urban flood control through a mathematical cell model. Water International 27 (2): 208-218. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1080/02508060208686994.
24. Miguez, M., A. Verol, and P. Carneiro. 2012. Sustainable drainage systems: an integrated approach, combining hydraulic engineering design, urban land control and river revitalisation aspects. Chapter 2 in M. S. Javaid, editor. Drainage Systems. InTech, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
25. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D. C., USA.
26. Mitchell, V., A. Deletic, T. Fletcher, B. Hatt, and D. McCarthy. 2006. Achieving multiple benefits from stormwater harvesting. T. Fletcher and A. Deletic, editors. In Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Urban Drainage Modelling and the 4th International Conference on Water Sensitive Urban Design (Melbourne, Australia, 2006). Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
27. Pearce, D. 1998. Environmental appraisal and environmental policy in the European Union. Environmental and Resource Economics 11(3-4): 489-501. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1023/A: 1008207715184.
28. Rezende, O. 2010. Avaliação de medidas de controle de inundações em um plano de manejo sustentável de águas pluviais aplicado à baixada fluminense. Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia (COPPE), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
29. Rogers, R. 1997. Cities for a small planet. Faber and Faber, London, UK.
30. Rosman, P., 2011. Referência técnica do SisBaHiA. Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia (COPPE), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
31. Schuyt, K. 2005. Economic consequences of wetland degradation for local populations in Africa, Ecological Economics 53: 177-190. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ecolecon. 2004. 08. 003.
32. Sousa, M. 2010. Comparação entre ferramentas de modelagem unidimensional e quasi-bidimensional, permanente e nãopermanente, em planejamento e projetos de engenharia hidráulica. Thesis. Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia (COPPE), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
33. Tardim, R. 2010. Projeto: Análise, ordenação e projeto da paisagem-Paraty. Observatório da Paisagem/Nucleo de Interdisciplinaridade de pesquisas em paisagens/Programa de pós-graduação em urbanismo/Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
34. United Nations Environment Programme. 2007. Global environment outlook. Progress Press, Valletta, Malta. [online] URL: http://www. unep. org/geo/geo4/report/GEO-4_Report_Full_en. pdf.
35. US Army Corps Engineers. 1993. River hydraulics: engineer manual. Department of the Army/U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D. C., USA.
36. US Department of Defense. 2010. Unified facilities criteria (UFC) design: low impact development manual. United States Department of Defense, Washington, USA. [online] URL: http://www. wbdg. org/ccb/DOD/UFC/ufc_3_210_10. pdf.
37. Vandewalle, M., F. de Bello, M. Berg, T. Bolger, S. Dolédec, F. Dubs, C. Feld, R. Harrington, P. Harrison, S. Lavorel, P. Martins da Silva, M. Moretti, J. Niemelä, P. Santos, T. Sattler, T. Sousa, M. Sykes, A. Vanbergen, and B. Woodcock. 2010. Functional traits as indicators of biodiversity response to land use changes across ecosystems and organisms. Biodiversity and Conservation 19: 2921-2947. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s10531-010-9798-9.
38. Vuuren, W., and P. Roy 1993. Private and social returns from wetland preservation versus those from wetland conversion to agriculture. Ecological Economics 8: 289-305. [online] URL: http://www. sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/092180099390063C.
39. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/0921-8009(93)90063-C.
40. White, D., and S. Fennessy. 2005. Modeling the suitability of wetland restoration potential at the watershed scale. Ecological Engineering 24: 359-377. http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ecoleng. 2005. 01. 012.
41. Wilken, P. 1978. Engenharia de drenagem superficial. Companhia de Tecnologia de Saneamento Ambiental, São Paulo, Brazil.