Environmental appraisal and environmental policy in the European Union

Environmental and Resource Economics

Volumn 11, Issue 3-4, 1998, Pages 489-501

  Pearce, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cost benefit analysis; Environmental policy; Precautionary principle; Risk assessment; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

COST ACCOUNTING; COST EFFECTIVENESS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; PUBLIC POLICY; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SYSTEMATIC APPRAISAL TECHNIQUES;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; EUROPEAN UNION; RISK ASSESSMENT;

(WEST); EUROPE;

EID: 0032053042     PISSN: 09246460     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1008207715184     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. AEA Technology (1996), Economic Evaluation of the Draft Incineration Directive. Luxembourg: European Commission.
2. Bolt, C (1993), The Cost of Quality: Establishing Willingness to Pay in a Regulated Monopoly. Birmingham: Office of Water Regulation (OFWAT).
3. Coopers and Lybrand, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), London and Norwich, and Economics for the Environment Consultancy, London (EFTEC) (1997), Cost Benefit Analysis of the Different Municipal Solid Waste Systems: Objectives and Instruments for the Year 2000. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
4. CSERGE, EFTEC and Warren Spring Laboratory (1993), Externalities from Landfill and Incineration. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
5. European Commission (1992), The Fifth Environmental Action Programme: Towards Sustainability. Brussels: European Commission.
6. European Parliament and Council (1994), 'EC Directive 94/62/EC On Packaging and Packaging Waste', Official Journal of the European Communities L365, 37(31): December.
7. Georgiou, S., I. Langford, I. Bateman and K. Turner (1998). 'Determinants of Individuals' Willingness to Pay for Perceived Reductions in Environmental Health Risks: A Case Study of Bathing Water Quality', Environment and Planning, A, 30, 577-594.
8. Holland, M. and W. Krewitt (1997), Benefits of an Acidification Strategy for the European Union. Brussels: European Commission, DGXI.
9. IVM (Institute for Environmental Studies, Free University of Amsterdam, NILU and International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (IIASA), (1998), Economic Evaluation of Air Quality for Sulphur Dioxide, Nitrogen Dioxide, Fine and Suspended Particulate Matter and Lead. Luxembourg: European Commission.
10. Litvan, D. (1994), Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of the Directive Proposal on the Emissions of Incineration Plants. Brussels: European Commission.
11. Mazurek, J. (1996), 'The Role of Health Risk Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis in Environmental Decision Making in Selected Countries: an Initial Survey', Resources for the Future Discussion Papers, 96-36, Washington DC: Resources for the Future.
12. Schall, J. (1992), 'Does the Solid Waste Management Hierarchy Make Sense?' School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, Program on Solid Waste Policy. Working Paper No. 1, October.
13. SEMA Group (1994), Economic Assessment of Materials Recycling versus Incineration with Energy Recovery of Household Wastes. Brussels: European Commission, mimeo.
14. SOFRES Conseil, Technische Universität Berlin, Institut fpr Kunstoffverarbeitung, and Boustead, I. (1997), Elements for a Cost-Effective Plastic Waste Management in the European Union: Objectives and Instruments for the Year 2000. Luxembourg: European Commission.
15. Touche Ross Management (1994), Cost-Benefit Analysis of the Proposed Council Directive on the Landfill of Waste. Brussels: European Commission, mimeo.
16. UK Department of the Environment (1995), A Guide to Risk Assessment and Risk Management for Environmental Protection. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
17. UK Government (1990), This Common Inheritance: Britain's Environmental Strategy. CM 1200. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
18. UK House of Lords, Select Committee on the European Communities, Session 1994-1995, 1st Report, Bathing Water, HL Paper 6-I; and Session 1994-1995, 7th Report, Bathing Water Revisited, HL Paper 6-I, London: HMSO.
19. UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1992), Sixteenth Report: Freshwater Quality, CM. 1966. London: HMSO.