Teaching interpreting students to identify omission potential

Advances in Teaching Sign Language Interpreters

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 123-137

  Napier, Jemina ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903682505     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Cokely, D. 1992. Interpretation: A sociolinguistic model. Burtonsville, Md.: Linstok Press.
2. Davis, J. 2000. Translation techniques in interpreter education. In Innovative practices for teaching sign language interpreters, ed. C. Roy, 109- 31. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
3. Dean, R., and R. Q. Pollard. 2001. The application of demand-control theory to sign language interpreting: Implications for stress and interpreter training. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 6 (1):1-14.
4. Garton, A., and C. Pratt. 1998. Learning to be literate: The development of spoken and written language. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Livingston, S., B. Singer, and T. Abramson. 1994. Effectiveness compared: ASL interpretation versus transliteration. Sign Language Studies 82: 1-54.
6. Metzger, M. 2000. Interactive role-plays as a teaching strategy. In Innovative practices for teaching sign language interpreters. ed. C. Roy, 83- 108. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
7. Napier, J. 2001. Linguistic coping strategies of sign language interpreters. Unpublished Ph.D. diss., Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
8. Napier, J. 2002. Sign language interpreting: Linguistic coping strategies. Coleford, UK: Douglas McLean.
9. Nida, E. 1998. Translators' creativity versus sociolinguistic constraints. In Translators' strategies and creativity, ed. A. Beylard-Ozeroff, J. Králová, and B. Moser-Mercer, 127-36. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10. Padden, C. 2000/1. Simultaneous interpreting across modalities. Interpreting, 5 (2):169-86.
11. Pöchhacker, F. 2000.The community interpreter's task: Self-perception and provider views. In The critical link 2: Interpreters in the community, ed. R. P. Roberts, S. E. Carr, D. Abraham, and A. Dufour, 49-66. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
12. Pollitt, K. 2000. Critical linguistic and cultural awareness: Essential tools in the interpreter's kit bag. In Innovative practices for teaching sign language interpreters, ed. C. Roy, 67-82. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
13. Roy, C. 2000a. Interpreting as a discourse process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Roy, C. 2000b. Innovative practices for teaching sign language interpreters. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.
15. Wadensjö, C. 1998. Interpreting as interaction. London: Longman.
16. Winston, E. A., and C. Monikowski. 2000. Discourse mapping: Developing textual coherence skills in interpreters. In Innovative practices for teaching sign language interpreters, ed. C. Roy, 15-66. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.