Wireless smart meters and public acceptance: The environment, limited choices, and precautionary politics

Public Understanding of Science

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 688-702

  Hess, David J ^a   Coley, Jonathan S ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

health and new technologies; precautionary principle; public understanding; radiofrequency; smart meters

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE; ENVIRONMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION;

ATTITUDE; CALIFORNIA; ENVIRONMENT; HEALTH POLICY; POLITICS; PUBLIC HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84903628945     PISSN: 09636625     EISSN: 13616609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0963662512464936     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Academy of Environmental Medicine (2012) Letter to the California Public Utilities Commission. January14. Available at: http://www.healthandenvironment.org/uploads/docs/AAEMResolution.pdf.
2. BlackmanCBlankMKundiMSageC (eds) (2007) BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF). Available at: http://bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/report/index.htm.
3. Brown PToxic Exposure: Contested Illnesses and the Environmental Health Movement. New York: Columbia University Press; 2007:.
4. Burgess A.Comparing national responses to perceived risks from mobile phone masts.Health, Risk, and Society. 2002;4 (2): 175-188.
5. Burgess A.Review of.The Precautionary Principle in the Twentieth Century. Health, Risk, and Society. 2003;5 (1): 105-107.
6. Burgess ACellular Phones, Public Fears, and a Culture of Precaution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
7. California Council on Science and Technology (2011) Health impacts of radiofrequency exposure from smart meters. Available at: http://www.ccst.us/publications/2011/2011smart-final.pdf.
8. California Public Utilities Commission (2011) Decision adopting rules to protect the privacy and security of the electricity usage data of the customers of Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern California Edison Company, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company. July29. Available at: http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/FINAL_DECISION/140369.htm.
9. CarpenterD (2011) Comments. Available at: http://sagereports.com/smart-meter-rf/?p=297.
10. CarpenterDSageC (2007) Section 17: Key scientific evidence and public health recommendations. In: BlackmanCBlankMKundiMSageC (eds) BioInitiative Report: A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF). Available at: http://www.bioinitiative.org/freeaccess/report/docs/section_17.pdf.
11. Collaborative on Health and the Environment (2012) Working group on electromagnetic fields. Available at: http://healthandenvironment.org/initiatives/emf.
12. Drake F.Mobile phone masts: Protesting the scientific evidence.Public Understanding of Science. 2006;15:387-410.
13. Drake F.Protesting mobile phone masts: Risk, neoliberalism, and governmentality.Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2011;36:522-549.
14. EMF Safety Network (2012a) EMF Safety Network. Available at: http://emfsafetynetwork.org.
15. EMF Safety Network (2012b) SMUD smart meter shenanigans. March17. Available at: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/?p=7284.
16. EMR Policy Institute (2003) The EMR Policy Institute announces two new directors and a scientific advisory board. Available at: http://www.emrpolicy.org/news/press/pr_6nov03.pdf.
17. EMR Policy Institute (2004) Citizens group challenges FCC refusal to investigate health effects of broadband transmissions. Available at: http://www.emrpolicy.org/news/press/pr_11feb04.pdf.
18. Fragopoulou A,Grigoriev Y,Johansson O,Margaritis L,Morgan L,Richter E,Sage C.Scientific panel on electromagnetic field health risks: Consensus points, recommendations, and rationales.Reviews on Environmental Health. 2010;25 (4): 307-317.
19. Frickel S,Gibbon S,Howard J,Kempner J,Ottinger G,Hess D.Undone science: Charting social movement and civil society challenges to research agenda setting.Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2010;35:444-473.
20. General Electric (2010) National survey: Americans willing to embrace new energy behaviors to affect change. June24. Available at: http://www.genewscenter.com/content/detail.aspx?ReleaseID=10490&NewsAreaID=2&PrintPreview=True.
21. Hallberg Ö,Oberfeld G.Letter to the editor: Will we all become electrosensitive?.Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. 2006;25:189-191.
22. HaltemanE (2011) Wireless utilities meter safety impacts survey. EMF Safety Network. Available at: http://emfsafetynetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Wireless-Utility-Meter-Safety-Impacts-Survey-Results-Final.pdf.
23. Hardell L,Carlberg M,Mild K.Re-analysis of risk for glioma in relation to mobile telephone use: Comparison with the results of the Interphone international case-control study.International Journal of Epidemiology. 2011;40 (4): 1126-1128.
24. Harremöes P,Gee D,MacGarvin M,Stirling A,Keys J,Wynne B,Vaz SThe Precautionary Principle in the Twentieth Century. London: Earthscan; 2002:.
25. Hess DThe Sage Handbook of Ethnography. Atkinson PCoffee ADelamon SLofland JLofland L, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2001:234-245.
26. Hess DLocalist Movements in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2009:.
27. Hess D.To tell the truth: On scientific counterpublics.Public Understanding of Science. 2011;20:627-641.
28. HirschD (2011) Comments on the draft report by the California Council on Science and Technology "Health impacts of radio frequency from smart meters." Available at: http://www.ccst.us/projects/smart2/documents/letter8hirsch.pdf.
29. Hom A,Plaza R,Palmén R.The framing of risk and implications for policy and governance: The case of EMF.Public Understanding of Science. 2011;20 (3): 319-333.
30. HullD (2012) PG&E customers can opt out of SmartMeters - for $75, plus $10 a month. MercuryNews.com. Available at: http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_19869073.
31. International Agency for Research on Cancer (2011) IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. IARC Press Release 208. Available at: http://www.iarc.fr.
32. Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: Results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study.International Journal of Epidemiology. 2010;39 (3): 675-694.
33. KCRA (2010) Some SmartMeter customers say devices make them sick. Available at: http://www.kcra.com/r/25639450/detail.html.
34. KellerT (2012) Guest post: Georgia legislators try to put the kibosh on smart meter opt-out bill. March25. Available at: http://stopsmartmeters.org/2012/03/25/guest-post-georgia-legislators-try-to-put-the-kibosh-on-smart-meter-opt-out-bill/.
35. Kinchy AGenes Out of Place. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012:.
36. KleinmanDDelborneJAutryR (2008) Beyond the precautionary principle in regulatory politics. Tailoring Biotechnology4(1/2). Available at: http://www.ijtds.com/volume_TB4.html.
37. Lezaun J,Soneryd L.Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16 (3): 279-297.
38. MaischD (2010) A Machiavellian spin: Political and corporate involvement with cell phone research in Australia. Available at: http://www.emfacts.com/papers/.
39. MaretK (2011) Commentary on the California Council on Science and Technology Report "Health impacts of radio frequency from smart meters." Available at: http://sagereports.com/smart-meter-rf/?p=368.
40. Marin County (2010) Board of Supervisors Meeting. December 14. Video title: "Angry public fights wireless meters." Available at: http://www.ktvu.com/news/news/pge-to-ignore-marin-county-moratorium-on-smartmete/nK3Sg/.
41. Mayer BBlue-Green Coalitions: Fighting for Safe Workplaces and Health Communities. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2009:.
42. National Institute of Environmental Health (2012) Cell phones. Available at: http://www.niehs.nih.gov/health/topics/agents/cellphones/index.cfm.
43. National Institute of Standards (2010) Guidelines for smart grid cyber security: Vol. 2, Privacy and the smart grid. Available at: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistir/ir7628/nistir-7628_vol2.pdf.
44. QuinnE (2009) Privacy and the new energy infrastructure. Center for Energy and Environmental Security, University of Colorado Law School. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1370731.
45. Richard Tell Associates (2008) Supplemental report on an analysis of radiofrequency fields associated with operation of the PG&E smart meter program upgrade system. Prepared for Pacific Gas & Electric Company, October27. Available at: http://www.pge.com/includes/docs/pdfs/shared/edusafety/systemworks/rfsafety/rf_fields_supplemental_report2008.pdf.
46. RobisonJ (2012) Nevada PUC approves smart meter opt-out plan. Las Vegas Review-Journal, February29. Available at: http://www.lvrj.com/business/nevada-puc-approves-smart-meter-opt-out-plan-140941433.html.
47. Sage CSanta Barbara, CA: Sage Associates; 2011a:.
48. SageC (2011b) Letter of comment on smart meter report. Available at: http://eon3emfblog.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/Sage-Final-CCST-Comment-Letter.-doc.pdf.
49. Smart Grid News (2010) Hawaii PUC kicks back project, tells utility to try it again. SmartGridNews, July28. Available at: http://www.smartgridnews.com/artman/publish/Business_Policy_Regulation/Hawaii-PUC-Kicks-Back-Smart-Meter-Project-Tells-Utility-to-Try-It-Again-2795.html.
50. Smart Meters (2012) Hawaii electric co-op sued over smart meters. March22. Available at: http://www.smartmeters.com/the-news/3115-hawaii-electric-co-op-sued-over-smart-meters.html.
51. Soneryd L.Deliberations on the unknown, the unsensed, and the unsayable? Public protests and the development of third-generation mobile phones in Sweden.Science, Technology, and Human Values. 2007;32:287-314.
52. St. JohnJ (2010) Baltimore's smart meter project is back on track. Gigaom, August16. Available at: http://gigaom.com/cleantech/baltimores-smart-meter-project-is-back-on-track/.
53. Stilgoe J.The (co-)production of public uncertainty: UK scientific advice on mobile phone health risks.Public Understanding of Science. 2007;16:45-61.
54. Stop Smart Meters (2012a) CA local governments on board. Available at: http://stopsmartmeters.org/how-you-can-stop-smart-meters/sample-letter-to-local-government/ca-local-governments-on-board/.
55. Stop Smart Meters (2012b) Defend your analog meter. Available at: http://stopsmartmeters.org/defend-your-analog-meter-main-index/.
56. Resolution on privacy and security related to smart meters. 2011;:.
57. TurkelT (2011) PUC approves "smart" meter opt-out options. Portland Press Herald, May17. Available at: http://www.pressherald.com/news/PUC-approves-smart-meter-opt-out-options.html.
58. Winner LThe Whale and the Reactor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1986:.
59. Wynne B.Misunderstood misunderstanding: Social identities and public uptake of science.Public Understanding of Science. 1992;1:281-304.
60. Wynne B.Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science: Hitting the notes, but missing the music?.Community Genetics. 2007;9:211-220.