Reflections on how designers design with data

Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 17-24

  Bigelow, Alex ^a   Drucker, Steven ^b   Fisher, Danyel ^b   Meyer, Miriah ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b MICROSOFT RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

design practice; infographics; visualization

Indexed keywords

FLOW VISUALIZATION; VISUALIZATION;

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS; DESIGN PRACTICE; DESIGN TOOL; ENGINEERING PROBLEMS; INFOGRAPHICS; PROFESSIONAL DESIGNERS; TEAM SETTING; VISUALIZATION TOOLS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84903618717     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2598153.2598175     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Fitbit Tracker, Fitbit, Inc., San Francisco, CA, http://www.fitbit.com.
2. S. Bateman, R. L. Mandryk, C. Gutwin, A. Genest, D. McDine, and C. Brooks. Useful junk?: the effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '10, pages 2573-2582, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
3. M. A. Borkin, A. A. Vo, Z. Bylinskii, P. Isola, S. Sunkavalli, A. Oliva, and H. Pfister. What makes a visualization memorable? Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 19(12):2306-2315, 2013.
4. M. Bostock and J. Heer. Protovis: A graphical toolkit for visualization. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6):1121-1128, 2009.
5. M. Bostock, V. Ogievetsky, and J. Heer. D3; data-driven documents. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(12):2301-2309, 2011.
6. M. Da Gandra and M. Van Neck. Informform, information design: in theory, an informed practice, 2012.
7. S. Dow, J. Fortuna, D. Schwartz, B. Altringer, D. Schwartz, and S. Klemmer. Prototyping dynamics: sharing multiple designs improves exploration, group rapport, and results. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '11, pages 2807-2816, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
8. S. P. Dow, A. Glassco, J. Kass, M. Schwarz, D. L. Schwartz, and S. R. Klemmer. Parallel prototyping leads to better design results, more divergence, and increased self-efficacy. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 17(4):18:1-18:24, Dec. 2010.
9. D. Fisher, S. Drucker, R. Fernandez, and X. Chen. Vis-a-vis: A Visual Language for Spreadsheet Visualizations. Technical Report MSR-TR-2011-142, Microsoft Research, 2011.
10. L. Grammel, C. Bennett, M. Tory, and M.-A. Storey. A survey of visualization construction user interfaces. In Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis), 2013.
11. L. Grammel, M. Tory, and M. Storey. How information visualization novices construct visualizations. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 16(6):943-952, 2010.
12. K. Ham. Openrefine (version 2.5). http://openrefine.org. free, open-source tool for cleaning and transforming data. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 101(3):233, 2013.
13. J. Heer, F. van Ham, S. Carpendale, C. Weaver, and P. Isenberg. Creation and collaboration: Engaging new audiences for information visualization. In Information Visualization, pages 92-133. Springer, 2008.
14. J. Hullman, E. Adar, and P. Shah. Benefitting infovis with visual difficulties. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(12):2213-2222, 2011.
15. H. Hutchinson, W. Mackay, B. Westerlund, B. B. Bederson, A. Druin, C. Plaisant, M. Beaudouin-Lafon, S. Conversy, H. Evans, H. Hansen, N. Roussel, and B. Eiderbäck. Technology probes: Inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '03, pages 17-24, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM.
16. D. Huynh, R. Miller, and D. Karger. Potluck: Data mash-up tool for casual users. In The Semantic Web, volume 4825 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 239-252. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
17. S. Kandel, A. Paepcke, J. Hellerstein, and J. Heer. Wrangler: Interactive visual specification of data transformation scripts. In ACM Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), 2011.
18. S. R. Klemmer, M. W. Newman, R. Farrell, M. Bilezikjian, and J. A. Landay. The designers' outpost: a tangible interface for collaborative web site. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, UIST '01, pages 1-10, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM.
19. B. Lee, S. Srivastava, R. Kumar, R. Brafman, and S. R. Klemmer. Designing with interactive example galleries. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '10, pages 2257-2266, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
20. C. Lewis. NoPumpG: Creating Interactive Graphics with Spreadsheet Machinery. Technical Report CU-CS-372-87, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Aug. 1987.
21. Y.-K. Lim, E. Stolterman, and J. Tenenberg. The anatomy of prototypes: Prototypes as filters, prototypes as manifestations of design ideas. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 15(2):7:1-7:27, July 2008.
22. J. Mackinlay, P. Hanrahan, and C. Stolte. Show me: Automatic presentation for visual analysis. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 13(6):1137-1144, 2007.
23. D. McCandless, D. Busby, and A. Cho. Timelines, http://www. informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/timelines.
24. R. Mercer. Daily social interactions, http://portfolio.rachelmercer.org/ projects/2634975#1.
25. M. Meyer, M. Sedlmair, and T. Munzner. The four-level nested model revisited: blocks and guidelines. In Proceedings of the 2012 BELIV Workshop: Beyond Time and Errors - Novel Evaluation Methods for Visualization, BELIV '12, pages 11:1-11:6, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
26. M. Meyer, M. Sedlmair, P. S. Quinan, and T. Munzner. The nested blocks and guidelines model. Information Visualization, 2013.
27. T. Munzner. A nested model for visualization design and validation. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 15(6):921-928, 2009.
28. S. Myers. A quantitative content analysis of errors and inaccuracies in missouri newspaper information graphics. Master's thesis, University of Missouri-Columbia, 2009.
29. M. W. Newman and J. A. Landay. Sitemaps, storyboards, and specifications: a sketch of web site design practice. In Proceedings of the 3rd conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, DIS '00, pages 263-274, New York, NY, USA, 2000. ACM.
30. C. Plaisant. The challenge of information visualization evaluation. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, AVI '04, pages 109-116, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
31. A. J. Pretorius and J. J. Van Wijk. What does the user want to see?: what do the data want to be? Information Visualization, 8(3):153-166, June 2009.
32. V. Raman and J. M. Hellerstein. Potter's wheel: An interactive data cleaning system. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB '01, pages 381-390, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2001. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
33. C. Reas and B. Fry. Processing.org: a networked context for learning computer programming. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Web program, SIGGRAPH '05, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM.
34. C. Robinson, S. Schube, and D. Savitzky. The HBO recycling program, http://visual.ly/hbo-recycling-program.
35. S. F. Roth, J. Kolojejchick, J. Mattis, and J. Goldstein. Interactive graphic design using automatic presentation knowledge. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '94, pages 112-117, New York, NY, USA, 1994. ACM.
36. W. J. Schroeder, K. M. Martin, and W. E. Lorensen. The design and implementation of an object-oriented toolkit for 3d graphics and visualization. In Proceedings of the 7th conference on Visualization '96, VIS '96, pages 93-ff., Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1996. IEEE Computer Society Press.
37. M. Sedlmair, M. Meyer, and T. Munzner. Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 18(12):2431-2440, 2012.
38. E. Segel and J. Heer. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 16(6):1139-1148, 2010.
39. R. Stewart and M. Schraefel. Graph sketcher: extending illustration to quantitative graphs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '09, pages 1113-1116, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM.
40. C. Stolte, D. Tang, and P. Hanrahan. Polaris: a system for query, analysis, and visualization of multidimensional relational databases. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 8(1):52-65, 2002.
41. R. Teal. Developing a (non-linear) practice of design thinking. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(3):294-302, 2010.
42. C. Vaiu. Scripting inkscape with d3.js, http://christopheviau.com/d3 tutorial/d3 inkscape/.
43. B. Victor. Dynamic pictures, http://worrydream.com/#!/ DynamicPicturesMotivation, March 2011.
44. F. Viegas, M. Wattenberg, F. van Ham, J. Kriss, and M. McKeon. Manyeyes: a site for visualization at internet scale. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 13(6):1121-1128, 2007.
45. A. Voida, E. Harmon, and B. Al-Ani. Homebrew databases: complexities of everyday information management in nonprofit organizations. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '11, pages 915-924, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
46. J. Walny, S. Carpendale, N. Henry Riche, G. Venolia, and P. Fawcett. Visual thinking in action: Visualizations as used on whiteboards. Visualization and Computer Graphics, IEEE Transactions on, 17(12):2508-2517, 2011.
47. H. Wickham. Reshaping data. ASA Statistical Computing and Graphics Newsletter, 16(2), 2005.
48. H. Wickham. A layered grammar of graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 19(1):3-28, 2010.