Sexual dimorphism and intraspecific variation in wing size and shape of Tongeia fischeri (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)

Entomological Science

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 342-353

  Jeratthitikul, Ekgachai ^a   Yago, Masaya ^b   Hikida, Tsutomu ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

Butterfly; Female biased sexual dimorphism; Intraspecific divergence; Japan; Landmark based geometric morphometrics; Wing venation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903607158     PISSN: 13438786     EISSN: 14798298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ens.12068     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Allen CE, Zwaan BJ, Brakefield PM (2011) Evolution of sexual dimorphism in the Lepidoptera. Annual Review of Entomology 56, 445-464.
2. Arnqvist G, Martensson T (1998) Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 44, 73-96.
3. Betts CR, Wootton RJ (1988) Wing shape and flight behaviour in butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea and Hesperioidae): a preliminary analysis. Journal of Experimental Biology 138, 271-288.
4. Boc A, Diallo AB, Makarenkov V (2012) T-REX: a web server for inferring, validating and visualizing phylogenetic trees and networks. Nucleic Acids Research 40, W573-W579.
5. Bookstein FL (1996) Combining the tools of geometric morphometric. In: Marcus LF, Corti M, Loy A, Naylor GJP, Slice DE (eds) Advances in Morphometrics, pp 131-151. Prenum Press, New York.
6. Bots J, Breuker CJ, Kaunisto KM, Koskimäki J, Gossum HV, Suhonen J (2012) Wing shape and its influence on the outcome of territorial contests in the damselfly Calopteryx virgo. Journal of Insect Science 12, 96.
7. Cockx C (2007) Directional and stabilizing selection on wing size and shape in migrant and resident monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus (L.), in Cuba. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 92, 605-616.
8. De Celis JF (2003) Pattern formation in the Drosophila wing: the development of the veins. BioEssays 25, 443-451.
9. De Celis JF, Diaz-Benjumea FJ (2003) Developmental basis for vein pattern variations in insect wings. International Journal of Developmental Biology 47, 653-663.
10. Drake AG, Klingenberg CP (2008) The pace of morphological change: historical transformation of skull shape in St. Bernard dogs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275, 71-76.
11. Dryden IL, Mardia KV (1998) Statistical Shape Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
12. Fischer K, Fiedler K (2000) Sex-related differences in reaction norms in the butterfly Lycaena tityrus (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Oikos 90, 372-380.
13. Fischer K, Fiedler K (2001) Sexual differences in life-history traits in the butterfly Lycaena tityrus: a comparison between direct and diapause development. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 100, 325-330.
14. Fukuda H, Hama E, Kuzuya T etal. (1984) The Life Histories of Butterflies in Japan. III. Hoikusha, Osaka. (In Japanese with English summary.)
15. Gidaszewski NA, Baylac M, Klingenberg CP (2009) Evolution of sexual dimorphism of wing shape in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. BMC Evolutionary Biology 9, 119.
16. Gilchrist GW (1990) The consequences of sexual dimorphism in body size for butterfly flight and thermoregulation. Functional Ecology 4, 475-487.
17. Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4, art.4.
18. Hernández-L N, Barragán ÁR, Dupas S, Silvain J-F, Dangles O (2010) Wing shape variations in an invasive moth are related to sexual dimorphism and altitude. Bulletin of Entomological Research 100, 529-541.
19. Hida H (2005) Revision of Fisher's blue Tongeia fischeri (Eversmann, 1843) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae), with description of a new subspecies. Butterflies (Sibataniozephyrus) 40, 18-25. (In Japanese with English summary.)
20. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Blakeley DS (1999) Evolution of flight morphology in a butterfly that has recently expanded its geographic range. Oecologia 121, 165-170.
21. Hirowatari T (1993) Overview of problems in Japan. In: New T (ed) Conservation Biology of Lycaenidae (Butterflies), IUCN Species Survival Commission Paper no. 8. pp 35-36. IUCN, Switzerland.
22. Iglesias WS, Crespo FA, Valverde AC (2012) Is parental care behavior in Belostoma species an evolutionary cause for their common sexual size dimorphism pattern? Entomological Science 15, 155-161.
23. Jarošík V, Honek A (2007) Sexual differences in insect development time in relation to sexual size dimorphism. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds) Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism, pp 205-211. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
24. Jeratthitikul E, Hara T, Yago M etal. (2013) Phylogeography of Fischer's blue, Tongeia fischeri, in Japan: evidence for introgressive hybridization. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 66, 316-326.
25. Kiyoshi T, Hikida T (2012) Geographical variation in the wing morphology of the golden-ringed dragonfly Anotogaster sieboldii (Selys, 1854) (Odonata, Cordulegastridae) detected by landmark-based geometric morphometrics. Bulletin of the National Museum of Nature and Science. Series A (Zoology) 38, 65-73.
26. Klingenberg CP (2011) MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Molecular Ecology Resources 11, 353-357.
27. Klingenberg CP, McIntyre GS (1998) Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with Procrustes methods. Evolution 52, 1363-1375.
28. Korshunov Y, Gorbunov P (1995) Butterflies of the Asian Part of Russia, A Hand Book. Ural University Press, Ekaterinburg. (in Russian, English translation by Kosterin O) [Cited 18 March 2013.] Available from URL: http://pisum.bionet.nsc.ru/kosterin/korgor/index.htm
29. Miguel I, Baylac M, Iriondo M, Manzano C, Garnery L, Estonba A (2010) Both geometric morphometric and microsatellite data consistently support the differentiation of the Apis mellifera M evolutionary branch. Apidologie 42, 150-161.
30. Miller LD (1970) Nomenclature of wing veins and cells. Journal of Research on the Lepioptera 8, 37-48.
31. Morbey YE, Ydenberg RC (2001) Protandrous arrival timing to breeding areas: a review. Ecology Letters 4, 663-673.
32. Muñoz-muñoz F, Talavera S, Pagès N (2011) Geometric morphometrics of the wing in the subgenus Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae): from practical implications to evolutionary interpretations. Journal of Medical Entomology 48, 129-139.
33. Reeve JP, Fairbairn DJ (1999) Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity. Heredity 83, 697-706.
34. Roggero A, Passerin d'Entrèves P (2005) Geometric morphometric analysis of wings variation between two populations of the Scythris obscurella species-group: geographic or interspecific diffenrences? (Lepidoptera: Scythrididae). SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterologia 33, 101-112.
35. Rohlf FJ (2010) Tpsdig Version 2.16. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.
36. Rohlf FJ (2012) Tpsutil Version1.49. Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York.
37. Sadeghi S, Adriaens D, Dumont HJ (2009) Geometric morphometric analysis of wing shape variation in ten European populations of Calopteryx splendens (Harris, 1782) (Zygoptera: Odonata). Odonatologica 38, 343-360.
38. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4, 406-425.
39. Santos M, Iriarte PF, Céspedes W, Balanyà J, Fontdevila A, Serra L (2004) Swift laboratory thermal evolution of wing shape (but not size) in Drosophila subobscura and its relationship with chromosomal inversion polymorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 14, 841-855.
40. Satonaka M (2003) A new subspecies of Tongeia fischeri from Japan. Choken Field 18, 4-9. (In Japanese with English summary.)
41. Satonaka M (2009) On Tongeia fischeri in Tsushima and in Kyushu. Yadoriga 221, 21-35. (In Japanese.)
42. Schutze MK, Jessup A, Clarke AR (2012a) Wing shape as a potential discriminator of morphologically similar pest taxa within the Bactrocera dorsalis species complex (Diptera: Tephritidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 102, 103-111.
43. Schutze MK, Krosch MN, Armstrong KF etal. (2012b) Population structure of Bactrocera dorsalis s.s., B. papayae and B. philippinensis (Diptera:Tephritidae) in southeast Asia: evidence for a single species hypothesis using mitochondrial DNA and wing-shape data. BMC Evolutionary Biology 12, 130.
44. Scott JA (1983) Mate-locating behavior of western North American butterflies: II New observations and morphological adaptations. Journal of Research on the Lepioptera 21, 177-187.
45. Shirôzu T (2006) The Butterflies of Japan in Color. Gakken, Tokyo. (In Japanese.)
46. Stillwell RC, Blanckenhorn WU, Teder T, Davidowitz G, Fox CW (2010) Sex differences in phenotypic plasticity affect variation in sexual size dimorphism in insects: from physiology to evolution. Annual Review of Entomology 55, 227-245.
47. Sullivan JB, Miller WE (2007) Intraspecific body size variation in macrolepidoptera as related to altitude of capture site and seasonal generation. Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 61, 72-77.
48. Svensson EI, Friberg M (2007) Selective predation on wing morphology in sympatric damselflies. The American Naturalist 170, 101-112.
49. Webster M, Sheets HD (eds) (2010) A practical introduction to landmarked-based geometric morphometrics. In: Alroy J, Hunt G (eds) The Paleontological Society Papers, vol 16, pp 163-188. The Paleontological Society, Boulder.
50. Yago M (2007) Tongeia fischeri. In: Yata O (ed.) Iconographia Insectorum Japonicorum Colore Naturali Edita, Vol. I, pp 64-66. (Butterflies and moths). Hokuryukan, Tokyo. (In Japanese.)
51. Yakovlev RV (2003) Revision of Fischer's blue Tongeia fischeri (Eversmann, 1843) (Lepidoptera, Lycaenidae). Helios 4, 181-197.
52. Zelditch ML, Swiderski DL, Sheets HD, Fink WL (2004) Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego.