Assessing the day-residue and dream-lag effects using the identification of multiple correspondences between dream reports and waking life diaries

Dreaming

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 71-88

  Henley Einion, Josephine A ^a   Blagrove, Mark T ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Barnum effect; Day residue; Dream; Dream lag; Overinclusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903594942     PISSN: 10530797     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0036329     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blackmore, S. J. (1997). Probability misjudgement and belief in the paranormal: A newspaper survey. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 683-689. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02665.x.
2. Blagrove, M., Fouquet, N. C., Henley-Einion, J. A., Pace-Schott, E. F., Davies, A. C., Neuschaffer, J. L., & Turnbull, O. H. (2011). Assessing the dream-lag effect for REM and NREM stage 2 dreams. PLoS ONE, 6, e26708. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026708.
3. Blagrove, M., French, C. C., & Jones, G. (2006). Probabilistic reasoning, affirmative bias and belief in precognitive dreams. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 65-83. doi:10.1002/acp.1165.
4. Blagrove, M., Henley-Einion, J., Barnett, A., Edwards, D., & Seage, H. C. (2011). A replication of the 5-7 day dream-lag effect with comparison of dreams to future events as control for baseline matching. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 384-391. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.07.006.
5. Bressan, P. (2002). The connection between random sequences, everyday coincidences, and belief in the paranormal. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 17-34. doi:10.1002/acp.754.
6. Brugger, P., Regard, M., Landis, T., Cook, C., Krebs, D., & Niederberger, J. (1993). Meaningful patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer's belief in ESP. Psychopathology, 26, 261-265. doi:10.1159/000284831.
7. Claridge, G., Clark, K., Powney, E., & Hassan, E. (2008). Schizotypy and the Barnum effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 436-444. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.09.006.
8. Edwards, C. L., Ruby, P. M., Malinowski, J. E., Bennett, P. D., & Blagrove, M. T. (2013). Dreaming and insight. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 979. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00979.
9. Eysenck, H. J. (1994). The measurement of creativity. In M. A. Boden (Ed.), Dimensions of creativity (pp. 199-242). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Fyfe, S., Williams, C., Pickup, G., & Mason, O. (2008). Apophenia, theory of mind and schizotypy: Perceiving meaning and intentionality in randomness. Cortex, 44, 1316-1325. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.07.009.
11. Marquardt, C. J. G., Bonato, R. A., & Hoffmann, R. F. (1996). An empirical investigation into the day-residue and dream-lag effects. Dreaming, 6, 57-65. doi:10.1037/h0094446.
12. Nielsen, T. A., Kuiken, D., Alain, G., Stenstrom, P., & Powell, R. A. (2004). Immediate and delayed incorporations of events into dreams: Further replication and implications for dream function. Journal of Sleep Research, 13, 327-336. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2869.2004.00421.x.
13. Nielsen, T. A., & Powell, R. A. (1989). The dream-lag effect: A 6-day temporal delay in dream content incorporation. Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa, 14, 561-565.
14. Nielsen, T. A., & Powell, R. A. (1992). The day-residue and dream-lag effects: A review and limited replication. Dreaming, 2, 67-77. doi:10.1037/h0094348.
15. Nielsen, T. A., & Stenstrom, P. (2005). What are the memory sources of dreaming? Nature, 437, 1286-1289. doi:10.1038/nature04288.
16. Nikles, C. D., II, Brecht, D. L., Klinger, E., & Bursell, A. L. (1998). The effects of current concern-and nonconcern-related waking suggestions on nocturnal dream content. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 242-255. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.242.
17. Saredi, R., Baylor, G. W., Meier, B., & Strauch, I. (1997). Current concerns and REM-dreams: A laboratory study of dream incubation. Dreaming, 7, 195-208. doi:10.1037/h0094474.
18. Selterman, D. F., Apetroaia, A. I., Riela, S., & Aron, A. (2014). Dreaming of you: Behavior and emotion in dreams of significant others predict subsequent relational behaviour. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 111-118. doi:10.1177/1948550613486678.
19. Snyder, C. R., & Shenkel, R. J. (1976). Effects of favourability, modality, relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44, 34-41. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.44.1.34.