Erratum: Transoral robotic surgery and the unknown primary: A cost-effectiveness analysis (Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States) (2014) 150 (976-982) DOI: 10.1177/0194599814525746);Transoral robotic surgery and the unknown primary: A cost-effectiveness analysis

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

Volumn 150, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 976-982

  Byrd, J Kenneth ^a   Smith, Kenneth J ^a   De Almeida, John R ^b   Albergotti, W Greer ^a   Davis, Kara S ^a   Kim, Seungwon W ^a   Johnson, Jonas T ^a   Ferris, Robert L ^a   Duvvuri, Umamaheswar ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Costeffectiveness analysis; Occult primary; TORS; Transoral robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER OF UNKNOWN PRIMARY SITE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; GLOSSECTOMY; HEAD AND NECK SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; HOSPITAL BILLING; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL FEE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; ORAL SURGERY; PALATINE TONSIL; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TONSILLECTOMY; TRANSORAL ROBOTIC SURGERY; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HEALTH CARE COST; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS, UNKNOWN PRIMARY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SECONDARY; ANESTHESIA; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SURGERY; CERVICAL UNKNOWN PRIMARY SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; CLINICAL EVALUATION; DEHYDRATION; HUMAN TISSUE; LENGTH OF STAY; NECK METASTASIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIRECT SERVICE COSTS; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK NEOPLASMS; HOSPITAL COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASMS, UNKNOWN PRIMARY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84903541626     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: 10976817     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0194599814554208     Document Type: Erratum

References (24)

1. Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jassem J, Orecchia R. Cervical lymph node metastases of squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary. Cancer Treat Rev. 2004;30:153-164.
2. Strojan P, Ferlito A, Medina JE, et al. Contemporary management of lymph node metastases from an unknown primary to the neck, I: a review of diagnostic approaches. Head Neck. 2013;35:123-132.
3. Cianchetti M, Mancuso AA, Amdur RJ, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes from an unknown head and neck primary site. Laryngoscope. 2009;119:2348-2354.
4. Mehta V, Johnson P, Tassler A, et al. A new paradigm for the diagnosis and management of unknown primary tumors of the head and neck: a role for transoral robotic surgery. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:146-151.
5. Nagel TH, Hinni ML, Hayden RE, Lott DG. Transoral laser microsurgery for the unknown primary: a role for lingual tonsillectomy [published online April 25, 2013]. Head Neck. doi: 10.1002/hed.23372.
6. Durmus K, Rangarajan SV, Old MO, Agrawal A, Teknos TN, Ozer E. Transoral robotic approach to carcinoma of unknown primary [published online May 29, 2013]. Head Neck. doi:10./hed.23385.
7. Barbash GI, Glied SA. New technology and health care costs -the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363:701-704.
8. Tomaszewski JJ, Matchett JC, Davies BJ, Jackman SV, Hrebinko RL, Nelson JB. Comparative hospital cost-analysis of open and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2012;80:126-129.
9. Close A, Robertson C, Rushton S, et al. Comparative costeffectiveness of robot-assisted and standard laparoscopic prostatectomy as alternatives to open radical prostatectomy for treatment of men with localised prostate cancer: a health technology assessment from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Eur Urol. 2013;64:361-369.
10. Salman M, Bell T, Martin J, Bhuva K, Grim R, Ahuja V. Use, cost, complications, and mortality of robotic versus nonrobotic general surgery procedures based on a nationwide database. Am Surg. 2013;79:553-560.
11. Richmon J, Quon H, Gourin CG. The effect of transoral robotic surgery on short-term outcomes and cost of care after oropharyngeal cancer surgery. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:165-171.
12. de Almeida JR, Villanueva NL, Moskowitz AJ, et al. Preferences and utilities for health states following treatment for oropharyngeal cancer: transoral robotic surgery versus definitive (chemo)radiotherapy [published online April 18, 2013]. Head Neck. doi:10.1002/hed.23340.
13. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality HCUPnet.2011. http://hcupnet.ahrq.gov. Accessed September 12, 2013.
14. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.2013. http://www.cms.gov. Accessed September 21, 2013.
15. Cantor SB. Cost-effectiveness analysis, extended dominance, and ethics: a quantitative assessment. Med Decis Making. 1994;14:259-265.
16. Gold M, Siegel J, Russel L, Weinstein M, eds. Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1996.
17. Braithwaite RS, Meltzer DO, King JT Jr., Leslie D, Roberts MS. What does the value of modern medicine say about the $50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year decision rule Med Care. 2008;46:349-356.
18. Sinha P, Lewis JS Jr., Piccirillo JF, Kallogjeri D, Haughey BH. Extracapsular spread and adjuvant therapy in human papillomavirusrelated, p16-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118: 3519-3530.
19. Maxwell JH, Ferris RL, Gooding W, et al. Extracapsular spread in head and neck carcinoma: impact of site and human papillomavirus status. Cancer. 2013;119:3302-3308.
20. Haas I, Hoffmann TK, Engers R, Ganzer U. Diagnostic strategies in cervical carcinoma of an unknown primary (CUP). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2002;259:325-333.
21. Karni RJ, Rich JT, Sinha P, Haughey BH. Transoral laser microsurgery: a new approach for unknown primaries of the head and neck. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:1194-1201.
22. Fernandez JA, Suarez C, Martinez JA, Llorente JL, Rodrigo JP, Alvarez JC. Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma in cervical lymph nodes from an unknown primary tumour: prognostic factors. Clin Otolaryngol. 1998;23:158-163.
23. Abuzeid WM, Bradford CR, Divi V. Transoral robotic biopsy of the tongue base: a novel paradigm in the evaluation of unknown primary tumors of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2013;35:E126-E130.
24. Kwee TC, Kwee RM. Combined FDG-PET/CT for the detection of unknown primary tumors: systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:731-744.