GIS-based hydrogeochemical analysis tools (QUIMET)

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 70, Issue , 2014, Pages 164-180

  Velasco, V ^a,b   Tubau, I ^c   Vazquez Sune E ^a   Gogu, R ^d   Gaitanaru, D ^d   Alcaraz, M ^a,b   Serrano Juan, A ^a,b   Fernandez Garcia D ^b   Garrido, T ^e   Fraile, J ^e   Sanchez Vila, X ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND WATER RESEARCH   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^c ICGC Institut Cartogràfic i Geològic de Catalunya   (Spain)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING   (Romania)

^e ACA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Geospatial database; GIS; Groundwater quality; Hydrogeochemical analysis

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROCHEMISTRY; INORGANIC CHEMICALS; QUERY PROCESSING; WATER QUALITY;

CHEMICAL PARAMETERS; DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; GEO-SPATIAL DATABASE; GROUND-WATER QUALITIES; HYDROGEOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; HYDROGEOCHEMICAL DATA; MEDITERRANEAN COASTS; GIS-BASED;

CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

DATABASE; GIS; GROUNDWATER; HYDROGEOCHEMISTRY; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

SPAIN;

EID: 84903516521     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2014.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aquaveo, 2012. ArcHydro Groundwater tools Aquaveo LLC. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.aquaveo.com/archydro-groundwater.
2. Araya M., Goyeneche G. Estudio Hidrogeológico de Badalona 2012, 83. Fundación Centro Internacional de Hidrología Subterránea (FCHIS), Barcelona, Spain, (in Spanish).
3. Barthel R., Sonneveld B., Götzinger J., Keyzer M., Pande S., Printz A., Gaiser T. Integrated assessment of groundwater resources in the Ouémé basin, Benin, West Africa. Phys. Chem. Earth 2008, 34:236-250.
4. Boroushaki S., Malczewski J. Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS. Comput. Geosci. 2008, 34(4):399-410.
5. Buccianti A. Is compositional data analysis a way to see beyond the illusion?. Comput. Geosci. 2013, 50:165-173.
6. Buccianti A., Pawlowsky-Glahn V. New perspectives onwater chemistry and compositional data analysis. Math. Geol. 2005, 37(7). (October 2005, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11004-005-7376-6).
7. Carrera J., Castillo O., Vàzquez-Suñé E., Sanchez-Vila X. A methodology to compute mixing ratios with uncertain end members. Water Resour. Res. 2004, 40:12. (Art. w12101).
8. Campo, C., 2004. Estudio Hidrogeológico de Badalona. Fundación Centro Internacional de Hidrología Subterránea (FCHIS), Barcelona, Spain, 177pp (in Spanish).
9. Carrera-Hernández J., Gaskin S. The Basin of Mexico Hydrogeological Database (BMHDB): implementation, queries and interaction with open source software. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008, 23:1271-1279.
10. Chesnaux R., Lambert M., Walter J., Fillastre U., Hay M., Rouleau A., Daigneault R. Building a geodatabase for mapping hydrogeological features and 3D modeling of groundwater systems: application to the Saguenay-Lac-St.-Jean region. Can. Comput. Geosci. 2011, 37(11):1870-1882. 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.04.013.
11. Comas-Cufí M., Thió-Henestrosa S., 2011. CoDaPack 2.0: a stand-alone, multi-platform compositional software. In: Egozcue, J.J., Tolosana-Delgado, R., Ortego, M.I. (Eds), Proceedings of the CoDaWork'11: 4th International Workshop on Compositional Data Analysis, Sant Feliu de Guíxols.
12. Descamps G., Therrien P., Therrien R. An interactive and open approach for the analysis and diffusion of geoscientific data. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 32:643-655.
13. Deutsch C., Journel A. GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide 1998, Oxford University Press, New York. second ed.
14. Dreher T. Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeol. J. 2003, 11(5):605-606. 10.1007/s10040-003-0289-x.
15. España S., Alcalá-Vallejos A., Pulido-Bosch A. ArcE:a GIS tool for modelling actual evapotranspiration. Comput. Geosci. 2011, 37:1468-1475.
16. ESRI, 2004. ArcGIS desktop developer guide: ArcGIS 9.1.ESRI, Redlands, US.
17. ESRI, 2013. ArcGIS 10x Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, United States of America. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/arcgis-for-desktop.
18. Farnham I.M., Singh A.K., Stetzenbach K.J., Johannesson K.H. Treatment of nondetects in multivariate analysis of groundwater geochemistry data. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2002, 60(1-2):265-281. 10.1016/S0169-7439(01)00201-5.
19. Foster S.S.D. The interdependence of groundwater and urbanization in rapidly developing cities. Urban Water 2001, 3(3):185-192.
20. Gemitzi A., Tolikas D. HYDRA model: simulation of salt intrusion in coastal aquifers using visual basic and GIS. Environ. Model. Softw. 2007, 22(7):924-936. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.03.007.
21. GHS, 2013a. EASYQUIM. Developed in the Department of Geotechnical Engineering at the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) and Geosciences and Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA- CSIC).Grupo de Hidrologia Subterránea (ETCG), UPC-CSIC, Barcelona (Spain). Available at: Accessed 18 September 2013. http://www.h2ogeo.upc.es/castellano/software.htm.
22. GHS, 2013b. MIX. Developed in the Department of Geotechnical Engineering and Geosciencesat the Technical University of Catalonia (UPC) and Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research (IDAEA- CSIC).Grupo de Hidrologia Subterránea (ETCG), UPC-CSIC, Barcelona (Spain). Available at: Accessed 18 September 2013. http://www.h2ogeo.upc.es/castellano/software.htm.
23. GIS and Environmental Modeling: Progress and Research Issues 1996, John Wiley & Sons, New York. M.F. Goodchild, L.T. Steyaert, B.O. Parks, C. Johnston (Eds.).
24. Gogu R., Carabin G., Hallet V., Peters V., Dassargues A. GIS-based hydrogeological databases and groundwater modelling. Hydrogeol. J. 2001, 9(6):555-569. 10.1007/s10040-001-01673.
25. Güler C., Thyne G., McCray J., Turner A. Evaluation of graphical and multivariate statistical methods for classification of water chemistry data. Hydrogeol. J. 2002, 455-474.
26. Helsel D.R. Fabricating data: how substituting values for nondetects can ruin results, and what can be done about it. Chemosphere 2006, 65(11):2434-2439. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.051.
27. ICOG,2011. INAQUAS, Ilustre Colegio Oficial de Geologos. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.icog.es/_portal/noticias/noticias.asp?bid=1133.
28. IBM, 2013. SPSS software, IBM Corporation. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/.
29. INSPIRE, 2013. Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe. D2.8.11.4. Data specification on Geology-Draft Technical Guidelines.Available at (accesed 19.05.2014). http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_GE_v3.0rc3.pdf.
30. Jia Y., Zhao H., Niu C., Jiang Y., Gan H., Xing Z., Zhao X., Zhao Z. A WeBGIS-based system for rainfall-runoff prediction and real-time water resources assessment for Beijing. Comput. Geosci. 2009, 35:1517-1528.
31. Ketata M., Hamzaoui F., Gueddari M., Bouhlila R., Ribeiro L. Hydrochemical and statistical study of groundwaters in Gabes-south deep aquifer (south-eastern Tunisia). Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C 2011, 36(5-6):187-196. 10.1016/j.pce.2010.02.006.
32. KWR, 2011. HyCA KWR Watercycle Research Institute, Holand. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.kwrwater.nl/HyCA/.
33. Lee T.C. A program for normalized stiff diagrams and quantification of grouping hydrochemical data. Comput. Geosci. 1998, 24(6):523-529.
34. LHA, 2013. Logicels, Laboratoire d'Hydrogéologie d'Avignon, Université d'Avignon et des Pays de Vaucluse, France. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.lha.univ-avignon.fr/.
35. Maidment D.R. ArcHydro: GIS for Water Resources 2002, 207. ESRI Press, Redlands, CA.
36. Martin P.H., Leboeuf E.J., Dobbins J.P., Daniel E.B., Abkowitz M.D. Interfacing GIS with water resource models: a state-of-the-art review. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2005, 41(6):1471-1487. 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03813.x.
37. Mckinney C.D., Cai X. Linking GIS and water resources management models:an object-oriented method. Environ. Model. Softw. 2002, 17:413-425.
38. Mendez, Montes Estudio Hidrogeológico de Badalona 2009, 193. Fundación Centro Internacional de Hidrología Subterránea (FCHIS), Barcelona, Spain, (in Spanish).
39. Mendizabal I., Stuyfzand P.J. Guidelines for interpreting hydrochemical patterns in data from public supply well fields and their value for natural background groundwater quality determination. J. Hydrol. 2009, 379(1-2):151-163. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.001.
40. Minitab, 2013. Minitab 16 Statistical Software, Minitab Inc. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.minitab.com.
41. Morio M., Finkel M., Martac E. Flow guided interpolation-a GIS-based method to represent contaminant concentration distributions in groundwater. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25(12):1769-1780. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.05.018.
42. Navarro-Ortega A., Acuña V., Batalla R.J., Blasco J., Conde C., Elorza F.J., Elosegi A., Francés F., La-Roca F., Muñoz I., Petrovic M., Picó Y., Sabater S., Sanchez-Vila X., Schuhmacher M., Barceló D. Assessing and forecasting the impacts of global change on Mediterranean rivers. The SCARCE Consolider project on Iberian basins. Environ. Sci Pollut. Res. 2012, 19(4):918-933.
43. Ormsby, T., Napoleon, E.J., Robert, B., Groess, C., 2010. Getting to know ArcGIS desktop. Esri Press, 592 pp.
44. ONEGeology, 2013. ONEGeology Project. Available at: (accessed 11.10.13.). http://www.onegeology.org.
45. Parkhurst D.L., Appelo C.A.J. Description of input and examples for PHREEQC version 3. A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. USGS Techniques and Methods 2013, 497. (Book 6).
46. Plummer, L.N., Prestemon, E.C., Parkhurst,D.L., 1994. An interactive code (NETPATH) for modeling NET geochemical reactions along a flow PATH version 2.0. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4169.
47. Rahman M.A., Rusteberg B., Gogu R.C., Lobo-Ferreira J.P., Sauter M. A new spatial multi-criteria decision support tool for site selection for implementation of managed aquifer recharge. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 99:61-75. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.003.
48. Remy N., Boucher A., Wu J. Applied Geostatistic with SGems 2009, Cambridge University Press, New York.
49. Rockware, 2013. AqQA, Rockware Inc. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.rockware.com/product/overview.php?id=150.
50. Romanelli A., Lima M.L., Londono O.M.Q., Martínez D.E., Massone H.E. A Gis-Based Assessment of Groundwater Suitability for Irrigation Purposes in Flat Areas of the Wet Pampa Plain, Argentina. Environmental management, 2012, 50(3):490-503.
51. SAS, 2012. SAS/STAT software, SAS Institute Inc. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.sas.com.
52. Scanlon B.R., Reedy R.C., Stonestrom D.A., Prudic D.E., Dennehy K.F. Impact of land use and land cover change on groundwater recharge and quality in the southwestern US. Glob. Change Biol. 2005, 11(10):1577-1593. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01026.x.
53. Schlumberger, 2013. AQUACHEM, Schlumberger Limited. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.swstechnology.com.
54. Shen J., Parker A.R. A new approach for a windows-based watershed modeling system based on a database-supporting architecture. Environ. Model. Softw. 2004, 20:1127-1138.
55. Soutter M., Alexandrescu M., Schenk C., Drobot R. Adapting a geographical information system-based water resource management to the needs of the Romanian water authorities. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2009, 16(Suppl 1):S33-S41. 10.1007/s11356-008-0065-5.
56. StataCorpoLP, 2013. STATA Data Analysis and Statistical Software, StataCorpoLP. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.stata.com.
57. Statsoft, 2013. STATISTICA Software. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.statsoft.com.
58. Steward D., Bernard E. The synergistic powers of AEM and GIS geodatabase models in water resources studies. Groundwater 2006, 44(1):56-61.
59. Strager M.P., Fletcher J.J., Strager J.M., Yuill C.B., Eli R.N., Todd Petty J., Lamont S.J. Watershed analysis with GIS: the watershed characterization and modeling system software application. Comput. Geosci. 2010, 36(7):970-976. 10.1016/j.cageo.2010.01.003.
60. Strassberg G. A Geographic Data Model for Groundwater systems (Ph.D. dissertation) 2005, 229. University of Texas, Austin, TX.
61. Systac, 2008. Systat 13, Systact Software, a Subsidiary of Cranes Software International Ltd. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://www.systat.com/.
62. Udina, F., 2005. XLS-BiPlot 1.1a User's Manual (Version 1.1a). Departament d'Economia i Empresa. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Spain. Available at: (accessed 03.06.13.). http://tukey.upf.es/xls-biplot/users-manual/index.html.
63. USGS, 2013. U.S. Geological Survey GW Chart Version 1.25.3.0. Available at (accessed 03.06.13.). http://water.usgs.gov/nrp/gwsoftware/GW_Chart/GW_Chart.html.
64. Vázquez-Suñè E., Casamitjana A., Sánchez-Vila X., Melcion C., Alcolea A., Sanz E. Hidrogeología de Badalona 2005, 83. Ajuntament de Badalona, Badalona, Spain.
65. Vázquez-Suñè E., Sánchez-Vila X., Carrera J. Introductory review of specific factors influencing urban groundwater, an emerging branch of hydrogeology, with reference to Barcelona, Spain. Hydrogeol. J. 2005, 13(3):522-533.
66. Velasco V., Cabello P., Vázquez-Suñè E., López-Blanco M., Ramos E., Tubau I. A sequence stratigraphic based geological model for constraining hydrogeological modeling in the urbanized area of the Quaternary Besòs delta (NW Mediterranean coast, Spain). Geol. Acta 2012, 10:373-394. 10.1344/105.000001757.
67. Velasco V., Gogu R., Vázquez-Suñè E., Garriga A., Ramos E., Riera J., Alcaraz M. The use of GIS-based 3D geological tools to improve hydrogeological models of sedimentary media in an urban environment. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 10.1007/s12665-012-1898-2.
68. Velasco V. GIS-based Hydrogeological Platform for Sedimentary Media (Ph.D. thesis) 2013, Technical University of Catalonia (UPC).
69. Zaporozec A. Graphical interpretation of water quality data. Ground Water 1972, 10:32-43.