Fabricating data: How substituting values for nondetects can ruin results, and what can be done about it

Chemosphere

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2006, Pages 2434-2439

  Helsel, Dennis R ^a  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Censored data; Detection limit; Nondetect; Statistics

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; CORRELATION METHODS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CENSORED DATA; DETECTION LIMIT;

ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING;

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING; CORRELATION METHODS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

DATA PROCESSING; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; ESTIMATION METHOD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DATA ANALYSIS; HYPOTHESIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICS;

EID: 33750969083     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.051     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allison P.D. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System: A Practical Guide (1995), SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC
2. Baccarelli A., Pfeiffer R., Consonni D., et al. Handling of dioxin measurement data in the presence of non-detectable values: Overview of available methods and their application in the Seveso chloracne study. Chemosphere 60 (2005) 898-906
3. Barringer J., Szabo Z., Kauffman L., Barringer T., Stackelberg P., Ivahnenko T., Rajagopalan S., and Krabbenhoft D. Mercury concentrations in water from an unconfined aquifer system, New Jersey coastal plain. Sci. Total Environ. 346 (2005) 169-183
4. Gilliom R.J., and Helsel D.R. Estimation of distributional parameters for censored trace level water quality data, 1. Estimation techniques. Water Resour. Res. 22 (1986) 135-146
5. Helsel D. Insider censoring: distortion of data with nondetects. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 11 (2005) 1127-1137
6. Helsel D. Nondetects and Data Analysis: Statistics for Censored Environmental Data (2005), John Wiley, New York
7. Helsel D.R., and Cohn T. Estimation of descriptive statistics for multiply censored water quality data. Water Resour. Res. 24 (1988) 1997-2004
8. Hornung R.W., and Reed L.D. Estimation of average concentration in the presence of nondetectable values. Appl. Occup. Environ. Hyg. 5 (1990) 46-51
9. McCarthy L., Stephens G., Whittle D., Peddle J., Harbicht S., La Fontaine C., and Gregor D. Baseline studies in the Slave River, NWT, 1990-1994; Part II. Body burden contaminants in whole fish tissue and livers. Sci. Total Environ. 197 (1997) 55-86
10. Millard S.P., and Deverel S.J. Nonparametric statistical methods for comparing two sites based on data with multiple nondetect limits. Water Resour. Res. 24 (1988) 2087-2098
11. Rocque D.A., and Winker K. Biomonitoring of contaminants in birds from two trophic levels in the North Pacific. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 23 (2004) 759-766
12. She N. Analyzing censored water quality data using a non-parametric approach. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 33 (1997) 615-624
13. Shumway R.H., Azari R.S., and Kayhanian M. Statistical approaches to estimating mean water quality concentrations with detection limits. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36 (2002) 3345-3353
14. Singh A., and Nocerino J. Robust estimation of mean and variance using environmental data sets with below detection limit observations. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 60 (2002) 69-86
15. Tajimi M., Uehara R., Watanabe M., Oki I., Ojima T., and Nakamura Y. Correlation coefficients between the dioxin levels in mother's milk and the distances to the nearest waste incinerator which was the largest source of dioxins from each mother's place of residence in Tokyo, Japan. Chemosphere 61 (2005) 1256-1262
16. USEPA, Office of Research and Development, 1998. Guidance for Data Quality Assessment: Practical Methods for Data Analysis. EPA/600/R-96/084, Washington, DC.