To achieve an earlier IFN-γ response is not sufficient to control Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice

PLoS ONE

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Vilaplana, Cristina ^a   Prats, Clara ^b   Marzo, Elena ^a   Barril, Carles ^b   Vegué, Marina ^b   Diaz, Jorge ^a   Valls, Joaquim ^b   López, Daniel ^b   Cardona, Pere Joan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAMMA INTERFERON;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; COLONY FORMING UNIT; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSPOT ASSAY; FEMALE; IMMUNE RESPONSE; INFECTION CONTROL; LUNG; LYMPH NODE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOUSE; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS; NONHUMAN; SPLEEN; TUBERCULOSIS; ANIMAL; BACTERIAL LOAD; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; C57BL MOUSE; IMMUNOLOGY; MYCOBACTERIUM INFECTIONS; PATHOGENICITY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BACTERIAL LOAD; FEMALE; INTERFERON-GAMMA; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MODELS, IMMUNOLOGICAL; MYCOBACTERIUM INFECTIONS; MYCOBACTERIUM TUBERCULOSIS;

EID: 84903516384     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100830     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baena A, Porcelli SA (2009) Evasion and subversion of antigen presentation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tissue Antigens 74: 189-204.
2. Briken V (2013) Mycobacterium tuberculosis genes involved in regulation of host cell death. Adv Exp Med Biol 783: 93-102.
3. Ramachandra L, Smialek JL, Shank SS, Convery M, Boom WH, et al. (2005) Phagosomal processing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85B is modulated independently of mycobacterial viability and phagosome maturation. Infect Immun 73: 1097-1105. (Pubitemid 40165770)
4. Ramachandra L, Noss E, Boom WH, Harding CV (2001) Processing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85B involves intraphagosomal formation of peptide-major histocompatibility complex II complexes and is inhibited by live bacilli that decrease phagosome maturation. J Exp Med 194: 1421-1432. (Pubitemid 33081517)
5. Mehra A, Zahra A, Thompson V, Sirisaengtaksin N, Wells A, et al. (2013) Mycobacterium tuberculosis type VII secreted effector EsxH targets host ESCRT to impair trafficking. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003734.
6. Vilaplana CC, Cardona PJ (2014) The lack of a big picture in tuberculosis: the clinical point of view, the problems of experimental modeling and immunomodulation. The factors we should consider when designing novel treatment strategies. Frontiers Microbiology 5.
7. Chackerian AA, Alt JM, Perera TV, Dascher CC, Behar SM (2002) Dissemination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is influenced by host factors and precedes the initiation of T-cell immunity. Infect Immun 70: 4501-4509. (Pubitemid 34790962)
8. Wolf AJ, Desvignes L, Linas B, Banaiee N, Tamura T, et al. (2008) Initiation of the adaptive immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis depends on antigen production in the local lymph node, not the lungs. J Exp Med 205: 105-115. (Pubitemid 351185719)
9. Bru A, Cardona P (2010) Mathematical modeling of tuberculosis bacillary counts and cellular populations in the organs of infected mice. PLoS One 5: e12985.
10. Cardona PJ, Ivanyi J (2011) The secret trumps, impelling the pathogenicity of tubercle bacilli. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 29 Suppl 1: 14-19.
11. Rubin EJ (2009) The granuloma in tuberculosis - friend or foe? N Engl J Med 360: 2471-2473.
12. Marzo E, Vilaplana C, Tapia G, Diaz J, Garcia V, et al. (2014) Damaging role of neutrophilic infiltration in a mouse model of progressive tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 94: 55-64.
13. Jung Y, Ryan L, LaCourse R, North R (2005) Properties and protective value of the secondary versus primary T helper type 1 response to airborne Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. J Exp Med 201: 1915-1924. (Pubitemid 41002928)
14. Khader S, Rangel-Moreno J, Fountain J, Martino C, Reiley W, et al. (2009) In a murine tuberculosis model, the absence of homeostatic chemokines delays granuloma formation and protective immunity. J Immunol 183: 8004-8014.
15. Hernandez-Pando R, Jeyanathan M, Mengistu G, Aguilar D, Orozco H, et al. (2000) Persistence of DNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in superficially normal lung tissue during latent infection. Lancet 356: 2133-2138.
16. Wang CY (1916) Latent tuberculosis. Lancet 2: 417-419.
17. Willard-Mack CL (2006) Normal structure, function, and histology of lymph nodes. Toxicol Pathol 34: 409-424.
18. Treuting PM, Dintzis SM, Frevert CW, Liggitt HD, Montine KS (2012) Comparative anatomy and histology: a mouse and human atlas. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Academic Press. xii, 461 p.
19. Cesta MF (2006) Normal structure, function, and histology of the spleen. Toxicol Pathol 34: 455-465.
20. Cardona PJ (2009) A dynamic reinfection hypothesis of latent tuberculosis infection. Infection 37: 80-86.
21. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models: Chapman and Hall.
22. Gill WP, Harik NS, Whiddon MR, Liao RP, Mittler JE, et al. (2009) A replication clock for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Med 15: 211-214.