From enterprise architecture to business models and back

Software and Systems Modeling

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1059-1083

  Iacob, M E ^a   Meertens, L O ^a   Jonkers, H ^b   Quartel, D A C ^b   Nieuwenhuis, L J M ^a   van Sinderen, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b BiZZdesign   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ArchiMate; Business Model Canvas; Business Model Ontology; Business modeling; Cost revenue analysis; Enterprise architecture

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ARCHIMATE; BASE-LINE ARCHITECTURE; BUSINESS MODELING; BUSINESS MODELS; CHANGE PROCESS; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE; ENTERPRISE MODELS; TARGET ARCHITECTURES;

SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

EID: 84903482661     PISSN: 16191366     EISSN: 16191374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10270-012-0304-6     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Al-Debei, M. M., Avison, A.: Developing a unified framework of the business model concept. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19, 359-376 (2010).
2. Buckl, S., Ernst, A. M., Matthes, F., Ramacher, R., Schweda, C. M.: Using enterprise architecture management patterns to complement TOGAF. In: Proceedings of the 13th International EDOC conference (EDOC 2009), Auckland, New Zealand, pp. 34-41 (2009).
3. Buckl, S., Franke, U., Holschke, O., Matthes, F., Schweda, C. M., Sommestad, T., Ullberg, J.: A pattern-based approach to quantitative enterprise architecture analysis. In: 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), San Francisco, USA Paper 318 (2009).
4. van Buuren, R., Jonkers, H., Iacob, M.-E., Strating, P.: Composition of relations in enterprise architecture models. In: Ehrig, H., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Graph Transformations. LNCS, vol. 3256, pp. 39-53. Rome, Italy (2004).
5. Constantin, J. A., Lusch, R. F.: Understanding Resource Management. The Planning Forum, Oxford (1994).
6. Demil, B., Lecocq, X.: Business model evolution: in search of dynamic consistency. Long Range Plan. 43, 227-246 (2010).
7. Dietz, J. L. G.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer, Berlin (2006).
8. Engelsman, W., Quartel, D., Jonkers, H., van Sinderen, M.: Extending enterprise architecture modeling with business goals and requirements. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 5, 9-36 (2011).
9. Ettema, R., Dietz, J. L. G.: ArchiMate and DEMO-mates to date? In: Albani, A., Barjis, J., Dietz, J. L. G. (eds.) Advances in Enterprise Engineering III, 5th International Workshop, CIAO! 2009, and 5th International Workshop, EOMAS 2009, held at CAiSE 2009, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, June 8-9. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 34(Part 4), 172-186. Springer (2009).
10. Foster, W., Kim, P., Christiansen, B.: Ten Nonprofit funding models, Stanford Social Innovation Review. 2009-03-05. http://www. ssireview. org/articles/entry/ten_nonprofit_funding_models/ (2009).
11. Freeman, R. E.: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston (1984).
12. Fritscher, B., Pigneur, Y.: Business IT alignment from Business model to enterprise architecture. In: Proceedings of 6th International Workshop on BUSiness/IT ALignment and Interoperability. London (2011).
13. Gordijn, J.: Value-based requirements engineering: exploring Iinnovative e-Commerce ideas. PhD thesis. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2002).
14. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H.: Value based requirements engineering: exploring innovative e-commerce idea. Requir. Eng. J. 8(2), 114-134 (2003).
15. Gordijn, J., Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Comparing two business model ontologies for designing e-Business models and value constellations. In: Proceedings of the 18th Bled eConference: eIntegration in Action. 18th Bled eConference eIntegration in Action. Bled, Slovenia (2005).
16. Graves, T.: Why business-model to enterprise-architecture? Tetradian 27 Jul 2011. http://weblog. tetradian. com/2011/07/27/why-bizmodel-to-ea/ (2011). Accessed 6 Sep 2011.
17. Hedman, J., Kalling, T.: The business model concept: theoretical underpinnings and empirical illustrations. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 12(1), 49-59 (2003).
18. Iacob, M. E., Jonkers, H.: Quantitative analysis of service-oriented architectures. Int. J. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 3(1), 42-60 (2007).
19. Iacob, M. E., Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., Proper, H.: ArchiMate 2. 0 Specification. van Haren Publishing, Zaltbommel (2012).
20. Iacob, M. E., Quartel, D., Jonkers, H.: Capturing business strategy and value in enterprise architecture to support portfolio Valuation. In: Proceedings of the 16th International EDOC Conference (EDOC 2012), 10-14 September. Beijing, China (2012) (Accepted for publication).
21. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission: ISO/IEC 42010: 2007 systems and software engineering-recommended practice for architectural description of software-intensive systems (2007).
22. Janssen, W., van Buuren, R., Gordijn, J.: Business case modelling for e-services. In: Proceedings 18th Bled eConference eIntegration in Action. Bled, Slovenia (2005).
23. Jonkers, H., van Buuren, R., Arbab, F., de Boer, F., Bonsangue, M., Bosma, H., ter Doest, H., Groenewegen, L., Guillen Scholten, J., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Iacob, M.-E., Janssen, W., Lankhorst, M., van Leeuwen, D., Proper, E., Stam, A., van der Torre, L., Veldhuijzen van Zanten, G.: Towards a language for coherent enterprise architecture descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Enterprise Distributed Object Computing, 16-19 Sept 2003, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 28-39 (ISBN 0-7695-1994-6) (2003).
24. Jonkers, H., Iacob, M.: Performance and cost analysis of service-oriented enterprise architectures, In: Angappa Gunasekaran (ed.) Global Implications of Modern Enterprise Information Systems: Technologies and Applications, pp. 49-73. Information science reference, Hershey (ISBN 978-1-60566-146-9) (2009).
25. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P.: The balanced scorecard-measures that drive performance. Harv. Bus. Rev. 70(1), 71-79 (1992).
26. Kim, W. C., Mauborgne, R.: Knowing a winning business idea when you see one. Harv. Bus. Rev. 78(5), 129-138 (2000).
27. Lambert S.: A conceptual framework for business model research. In: Proceedings of the 21st Bled eConference: eIntegration in Action. 21st Bled eConference eCollaboration: Overcoming Boundaries through Multi-Channel Interaction, pp. 227-289. Bled, Slovenia (2008).
28. Lankhorst, M.: ArchiMate Language Primer, Telematica Institute. Technical report (2004).
29. Lumpkin, G. T., Dess, G. G.: E-business strategies and Internet business models: how the Internet adds value. Organ. Dyn. 33(2), 161-173 (2004).
30. Meertens, L. O., Iacob, M. E., Jonkers, H., Quartel, D., van Sinderen, M., Nieuwenhuis, L. J. M.: Mapping the business model canvas to ArchiMate. In: Proceedings of the of the 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, Riva del Garda (Trento), Italy, March 26-30, pp. 1694-1701 (2012).
31. Morris, M., Schindehutte, M., Allen, J.: The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective. J. Bus. Res. 58(6), 726-735 (2005).
32. Op 't Land, M.: Applying architecture and ontology to the splitting and allying of enterprises. PhD thesis, TU Delft (2008).
33. Osterwalder, A.: The business model ontology-a proposition in a design science approach. PhD thesis, Universite de Lausanne (2004).
34. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business model generation. Wiley, New York (2010).
35. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y., Tucci, C. L.: Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept. Commun. AIS 15(May), 2-40 (2005).
36. Pateli, A. G., Giaglis, G. M.: A research framework for analysing eBusiness models. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 13(4), 302-314 (2004).
37. Porter, M. E.: Competitive Advantage. Free Press, New York (1985).
38. The Open Group: Technical standard risk taxonomy. Doc. no. C08 (ISBN: 1-931624-77-1) (2009).
39. The Open Group: TOGAF® Version 9. 1. van Haren Publishing (2011).
40. Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68, 1-17 (2004).
41. Weill, P., Broadbent, M.: Leveraging the new infrastructure: how market leaders capitalize on information technology. Harvard Business Press, Harvard (1998).
42. Weill, P., Vitale, M.: What IT infrastructure capabilities are needed to implement e-business models. MIS Q. Executive 1(1), 17-34 (2002).
43. Wirtz, B. W., Schilke, O., Ullrich, S.: Strategic development of business models. Implications of the Web 2. 0 for creating value on the Internet. Long Range Plan. 43, 272-290 (2010).
44. Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., Lehmann-Ortega, L.: Building social business models: lessons from the Grameen experience. Long Range Plan. 43, 308-325 (2010).
45. Zott, C., Amit, R.: Business model design: an activity system perspective. Long Range Plan. 43, 216-226 (2010).
46. Zott, B., Amit, R., Massa, L.: The business model: recent developments and future research. J. Manag. 37(4), 1019-1042 (2011).