Diel patterns of leaf carbohydrate concentrations differ between seedlings and mature trees of two sympatric oak species

Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 535-540

  Baber, Ori ^a   Slot, Martijn ^a,b   Celis, Gerardo ^a   Kitajima, Kaoru ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^c KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Carbohydrate dynamics; Gas exchange; Plant ontogeny; Quercus hemisphaerica; Quercus virginiana

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; CARBON BALANCE; CARBON CYCLE; DIEL VARIATION; GAS EXCHANGE; ONTOGENY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; SEEDLING; SYMPATRY; TREE;

EID: 84903475492     PISSN: 19162804     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/cjb-2014-0032     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Ainsworth, E.A., and Bush, D.R. 2011. Carbohydrate export from the leaf:ahighly regulated process and target to enhance photosynthesis and productivity. Plant Physiol. 155(1): 64-69.doi:10.1104/pp.110.167684. PMID:20971857.
2. Allen, L.H., Jr., Bisbal, E.C., and Boote, K.J. 1998. Nonstructural carbohydrates of soybean plants grown in subambient and superambient levels of CO2. Photosynth. Res. 56(2): 143-155.doi:10.1023/A:1006016009305.
3. Bansal, S., and Germino, M.J. 2008. Carbon balance of conifer seedlings at tim-berline: relative changes in uptake, storage, and utilization. Oecologia, 158(2): 217-227.doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1145-4. PMID:18810499.
4. Bansal, S., and Germino, M.J. 2009. Temporal variation of nonstructural carbohydrates in montane conifers: similarities and differences among developmental stages, species, and environmental conditions. Tree Physiol. 29(4): 559-568.doi:10.1093/treephys/tpn045. PMID:19203971.
5. Cavender-Bares, J., Kitajima, K., and Bazzaz, F.A. 2004. Multiple trait associations in relation to habitat differentiation among 17 Floridian oak species. Ecol. Monogr. 74(4): 635-662.doi:10.1890/03-4007.
6. Chapin, F.S., Schulze, E.D., and Mooney, H.A. 1990. The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 21: 423-447.doi:10.1146/ annurev.es.21.110190.002231.
7. Dietze, M.C., Sala, A., Carbone, M.S., Czimczik, C.I., Mantooth, J.A., Richardson, A.D., and Vargas, R. 2014. Nonstructural carbon in woody plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65: 667-687.doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040054. PMID:24274032.
8. Dubois, M., Gilles, K.A., Hamilton, J.K., Rebers, P.A., and Smith, F. 1956. Colori-metric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28: 350-356.doi:10.1021/ac60111a017.
9. Farnham, M.W., Gross, H.D., and Cappy, J.J. 1986. Distribution and diurnal variation of nonstructural carbohydrate in peanut grown under unshaded and shaded conditions. Peanut Sci. 13(2): 51-57.doi:10.3146/i0095-3679-13-2-2.
10. Fondy, B.R., and Geiger, D.R. 1982. Diurnal pattern of translocation and carbohydrate metabolism in source leaves of Beta vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 70(3): 671-676.doi:10.1104/pp.70.3.671. PMID:16662555.
11. Iida, Y., Poorter, L., Sterck, F.J., Kassim, A.R., Potts, M.D., Kubo, T., and Kohyama, T. 2014. Linking size-dependent growth and mortality with architectural traits across 145 co-occurring tropical tree species. Ecology, 95(2): 353-363.doi:10.1890/11-2173.1. PMID:24669729.
12. Koch, K.E. 1996. Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant. Physiol. Plant. Mol. Biol. 47: 509-540.doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.47. 1.509. PMID:15012299.
13. Körner, C. 2003. Alpine plant life: Functional plant ecology of high mountain ecosystems. Springer, Berlin.
14. McDowell, N., Pockman, W.T., Allen, C.D., Breshears, D.D., Cobb, N., Kolb, T., Plaut, J., Sperry, J., West, A., Williams, D.G., and Yepez, E.A. 2008. Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol. 178(4): 719-739.doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02436.x. PMID:18422905.
15. Morandini, P. 2009. Rethinking metabolic control. Plant Sci. 176(4): 441-451.doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.01.005.
16. Morin, C., Bélanger, G., Tremblay, G.F., Bertrand, A., Castonguay, Y., Drapeau, R., Michaud, R., Berthiaume, R., and Allard, G. 2011. Diurnal variations of non-structural carbohydrates and nutritive value in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 51: 1297-1306.doi:10.2135/cropsci2010.07.0406.
17. Noguchi, K., and Terashima, I. 1997. Different regulation of leaf respiration between Spinacia oleracea, as sun species, and Alocasia odora, a shade species. Physiol. Plant. 101(1): 1-7.doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01812.x.
18. Poorter, H., Niklas, K.J., Reich, P.B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P., and Mommer, L. 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol. 193(1): 30-50.doi:10.1111/ j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x. PMID:22085245.
19. Poorter, H., Bühler, J., van Dusschoten, D., Climent, J., and Postma, J. 2012. Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Funct. Plant Biol. 39(11): 839-850.doi:10.1071/FP12049.
20. Sala, A., Woodruff, D.R., and Meinzer, F.C. 2012. Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine? Tree Physiol. 32(6): 764-775.doi:10.1093/treephys/tpr143. PMID: 22302370.
21. Spector, T., and Putz, F.E. 2006. Crown retreat of open-grown Southern live oaks (Quercus virginiana) due to canopy encroachment in Florida, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 228: 168-176.doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.001.
22. Steppe, K., Niinemets, Ü., and Teskey, R.O. 2011 Tree size- and age-related changes in leaf physiology and their influence on carbon gain. In Size- and age-related changes in tree structure and function. Edited by F.C. Meinzer, T. Dawson, and B. Lachenbruch. Springer, Berlin. pp. 235-253.doi:10.1007/ 978-94-007-1242-3_9.
23. Sulpice, R., Pyl, E.T., Ishihara, H., Trenkamp, S., Steinfath, M., Witucka-Wall, H., Gibon, Y., Usadel, B., Poree, F., Conceição Piques, M., Von Korff, M., Steinhauser, M.C., Keurentjes, J.J.B., Guenther, M., Hoehne, M., Selbig, J., Fernie, A.R., Altmann, T., and Stitt, M. 2009. Starch as a major integrator in the regulation of plant growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106(25): 10348-10353.doi:10.1073/pnas.0903478106. PMID:19506259.
24. Templeton, M., and Putz, F.E. 2003. Crown encroachment on southern live oaks in suburban settings: tree status and homeowner concerns. J. Arboricult. 29(6): 337-341. Available from http://archive.treelink.org/joa/2003/nov/06Templeton.pdf [accessed 7 June 2013].
25. Tognetti, R., and Johnson, J.D. 1999. The effect of elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration and nutrient supply on gas exchange, carbohydrates and foliar phenolic concentration in live oak (Quercus virginiana Mill.) seedlings. Ann. For. Sci. 56(5): 379-389.doi:10.1051/forest:19990503.
26. Townend, J., and Dickinson, A.L. 1995. A comparison of rooting environments in containers of different sizes. Plant Soil, 175(1): 139-146.doi:10.1007/ BF02413019.
27. Whitfield, C.P., Davison, A.W., and Ashenden, T.W. 1996. Interactive effects of ozone and soil volume on Plantago major. New Phytol. 134: 287-294.doi:10. 1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb04633.x.
28. Würth, M.K.R., Winter, K., and Körner, C. 1998. Leaf carbohydrate responses to CO2 enrichment at the top of a tropical forest. Oecologia, 116(1-2): 18-25.doi:10.1007/PL00013821.
29. Yang, W.Q., Murthy, R., King, P., and Topa, M.A. 2002. Diurnal changes in gas exchange and carbon partitioning in needles of fast- and slow-growing families of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Tree Physiol. 22(7): 489-498.doi:10.1093/ treephys/22.7.489. PMID:11986052.