Erratum: Forest development phases as an integrating tool to describe habitat preferences of breeding birds in lowland beech forests (J Ornithol, (2015) 156, (19-29), 10.1007/s10336-014-1095-z);Forest development phases as an integrating tool to describe habitat preferences of breeding birds in lowland beech forests;Waldentwicklungsphasen als ein integrierendes werkzeug zur beschreibung von habitatpräferenzen von brutvögeln innerhalb von tieflandbuchenwäldern

Journal of Ornithology

Volumn 156, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 19-29

  Begehold, Heike ^a,b   Rzanny, Michael ^b   Flade, Martin ^a  

^a Brandenburg State Office for Environment Landesamt für Umwelt   (Germany)

^b DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Breeding bird community; Forest developmental stages; Forest structure; Habitat use; Jacobs index; Nesting guilds

Indexed keywords

AVES; FAGUS;

EID: 84903419215     PISSN: 21937192     EISSN: 21937206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-014-1110-4     Document Type: Erratum

References (65)

1. Anderson SH, Shugart HH Jr.(1974) Habitat selection of breeding birds in an East Tennessee deciduous forest. Ecology 55:828-837
2. Andrén H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355-366
3. Angelstam P, Boutin S, Schmiegelow F et al (2004) Targets for boreal forest biodiversity conservation: a rationale for macroecological research and adaptive management. Ecol Bull 51:487-509
4. Bohn U, Weber H (2000) Karte der natürlichen vegetation Europas, Maßstab 1:2,5 Mio. Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn
5. Bühler U (2009) Totholz-existenziell für den weissrückenspecht in Nordbünden | Dead wood - a vital necessity for the white-backed woodpecker in the Grisons. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fur Forstwes 160:210-217
6. Bundesregierung (2002) Perspektiven fü r Deutschland-Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie für Deutschland. Bundesregierung, Berlin
7. Burgman MA, Fox JC (2003) Bias in species range estimates from minimum convex polygons: implications for conservation and options for improved planning. Anim Conserv 6:19-28
8. Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD). Klimadaten für Deutschland. Available at: http://dwd.de. Accessed 12 Dec 2013
9. Dierschke J, Dierschke V, Hüppop K, Hüppop O, Jachmann KF (2011) Die Vogelwelt der Insel Helgoland. OAG Helgoland, Helgoland
10. Enoksson B, Angelstam P, Larsson K (1995) Deciduous forest and resident birds: the problem of fragmentation within a coniferous forest landscape. Landsc Ecol 10:267-275
11. Ferry C, Frochot B (1990) Bird communities of the forests of Burgundy and the Jura (eastern France). In: Keast A (ed) Biogeography and ecology of forest bird communities. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 183-195
12. Fichtner A, von Oheimb G, Härdtle W et al (2014) Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on soil microbial communities in oak forests persist for more than 100 years. Soil Biol Biochem 70:79-87
13. Fischer A (1995) Forstliche Vegetationskunde. Pareys Studientexte 82. Blackwell Wissenschafts Verlag, Berlin
14. Flade M (1994) Die brutvogelgemeinschaften mittel- und Norddeutschlands. Grundlagen für den Gebrauch vogelkundlicher Daten in der Landschaftsplanung. IHW, Eching
15. Flade M (1995) The identification of indicator species for landscape planning in Germany. In: Hagemeijer EJM, Verstrael TJ (eds) Bird numbers 1992: Distribution, monitoring and ecological aspects. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. IBCC and EOAC, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands. SOVON, Beek-Ubbergen, pp 371-381
16. Flade M (2013) Vögel im Wald-Schutz durch FFH- und Vogelschutzrichtlinie. Naturschutz Biol Vielfalt 131:131-144
17. Flade M, Möller GC, Schumacher H, Winter S (2004) Naturschutzstandards fü r die bewirtschaftung von buchenwäldern im Nordostdeutschen Tiefland. Der Dauerwald 29:15-28
18. Frank G (2002) Brutzeitliche Einnischung des Weißrückenspechtes Dendrocopos leucotos im Vergleich zum Buntspecht Dendrocopos major in montanen Mischwäldern der nördlichen Kalkalpen. Vogelwelt 123:225-239
19. Fuller RJ (2000) Influence of treefall gaps on distribution of breeding birds within interior old-growth stands in białowiez_ a forest, Poland. Condor 102:267-274
20. Ghadiri Khanaposhtani M, Kaboli M, Karami M, Etemad V (2012) Effect of habitat complexity on richness, abundance and distributional pattern of forest birds. Environ Manage 50:296-303
21. Głowaciński Z (1975) Succession of bird communities in the Niepolomice forest (southern Poland). Ekol Pol 23:231-264
22. Gower JC (1971) Statistical methods of comparing different multivariate analyses of the same data. In: Hodson FR, Kendall DG, Tautu P (eds) Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp 138-149
23. Gregory RD, Baillie SR (1998) Large-scale habitat use of some declining British birds. J Appl Ecol 35:785-799
24. Gregory RD, Vorisek P, Van Strien A et al (2007) Population trends of widespread woodland birds in Europe. Ibis 149:78-97
25. Haila Y, Hanski IK, Raivio S (1989) Methodology for studiying the minimum habitat requirements of forest birds. Ann Zool Fennici 26:173-180
26. Haila Y, Nicholls AO, Hanski IK, Raivio S (1996) Stochasticity in bird habitat selection: year-to-year changes in territory locations in a boreal forest bird assemblage. Oikos 76:536-552
27. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Virkkala R, Rainio K (2004) Effects of habitat cover, landscape structure and spatial variables on the abundance of birds in an agricultural-forest mosaic. J Appl Ecol 41:824-835
28. Hertel F (2003) Habitatnutzung und Nahrungserwerb von Buntspecht Picoides major, Mittelspecht Picoides medius und Kleiber Sitta europaea in bewirtschafteten und unbewirtschafteten Buchenwäldern des nordostdeutschen Tieflandes. Vogelwelt 124:111-132
29. Hewson CM, Austin GE, Gough SJ, Fuller RJ (2011) Species-specific responses of woodland birds to stand-level habitat characteristics: the dual importance of forest structure and floristics. For Ecol Manage 261:1224-1240
30. Jackson DA (1995) Protest: a procrustean randomization test of community environment concordance. Écoscience 2:297-303
31. Jacobs J (1974) Quantitative measurements of food selection. A modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev’s electivity index. Oecologia 14:413-417
32. Jenouvrier S (2013) Impacts of climate change on avian populations. Glob Chang Biol 19:2036-2057
33. Knapp HD, Jeschke L (1991) Naturwaldreservate und Naturwaldforschung in den ostdeutschen Bundesländern. Schriftenreihe Vegetationskunde 21:21-54
34. Kopp D, Schwanecke W (1994) Standörtlich-naturräumliche Grundlagen ökologiegerechter Forstwirtschaft. Landwirtschaftsverlag, Berlin
35. Lachat T, Wermelinger B, Gossner MM et al (2012) Saproxylic beetles as indicator species for dead-wood amount and temperature in European beech forests. Ecol Indic 23:323-331
36. Lassauce A, Paillet Y, Jactel H, Bouget C (2011) Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms. Ecol Indic 11:1027-1039
37. Lemoine N, Schaefer H-C, Böhning-Gaese K (2007a) Species richness of migratory birds is influenced by global climate change. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:55-64
38. Lemoine N, Bauer HG, Peintinger M, Böhning-Gaese K (2007b) Impact of land-use and global climate change on species abundance in a Central European bird community. Conserv Biol 21:495-503
39. Lynch JF, Whigham DF (1984) Effects of forest fragmentation on breeding bird communities in Maryland, USA. Biol Conserv 28:287-324
40. Marti J (2007) Zur Habitatwahl des Waldlaubsängers Phylloscopus sibilatrix im Kanton Glarus | Habitat characteristics of the Wood Warbler Phylloscopus sibilatrix territories in the canton of Glarus, Switzerland. Der Ornithol Beobachter 104:45-52
41. Martin TE (1998) Are microhabitat preferences of coexisting species under selection and adaptive? Ecology 79:656-670
42. Mitchell MS, Rutzmoser SH, Wigley TB et al (2006) Relationships between avian richness and landscape structure at multiple scales using multiple landscapes. For Ecol Manage 221:155-169
43. Möller GC (2005) Habitatstrukturen holzbewohnender insekten und pilze. LÖBF-Mitteilungen 3:30-35
44. Moorman CE, Guynn DCJr (2001) Efects of group-selection opening size on breeding bird habitat use in a bottomland forest. Ecol Appl 11:1680-1691
45. Müller J, Bußler H, Bense U et al (2005) Urwald relict speciessaproxylic beetles indicating structural qualities and habitat tradition. Waldökologie online 2:106-113
46. Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2013) Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-8. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
47. R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/
48. Robinson SK, Thompson FR III, Donovan TM et al (1995) Regional forest fragmentation and the nesting success of migratory birds. Science 267:1987-1990
49. Schaefer H-C, Jetz W, Böhning-Gaese K (2008) Impact of climate change on migratory birds: community reassembly versus adaptation. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:38-49
50. Schumacher H (2005) Zum Einfluss forstlicher Bewirtschaftung auf die Avifauna von Rotbuchenwäldern im nordostdeutschen Tiefland. PhD thesis. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
51. Sekercioğlu CH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2004) Ecosystem consequences of bird declines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:18042-18047
52. Smith KW (2007) The utilization of dead wood resources by woodpeckers in Britain. Ibis 149:183-192
53. Smith KW, Averis B, Martin J (1985) The breeding bird community of oak plantations in the forest of dean, southern England. Acta Oecol/Oecol gen 8:209-217
54. Statistisches Bundesamt (2010) Nachhaltige Entwicklung in Deutschland. Indikatorenbericht 2010. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden
55. Südbeck P, Andretzke H, Fischer S, Gedeon K, Schikore T, Schröder K, Sudfeldt C (2005) Methodenstandards zur Erfassung der Brutvögel Deutschlands. Radolfzell
56. Tabaku V (2000) Struktur von Buchen-Urwäldern in Albanien im Vergleich mit deutschen Buchen-Naturwaldreservaten und - Wirtschaftswäldern. PhD thesis. Cuvillier Verlag, Göttingen
57. Van den Boogaart KG, Tolosana R & Bren M (2013) Compositions: compositional data analysis. R package version 1. 30-1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=compositions
58. Wesołowski T, Rowiński P (2004) Breeding behaviour of Nuthatch Sitta Europaea in relation to natural hole attributes in a primeval forest. Bird Study 51:143-155
59. Winter S (2005) Ermittlung von Struktur-Indikatoren zur Abschätzung des Einflusses forstlicher Bewirtschaftung auf die Biozönosen von Tiefland-Buchenwäldern. PhD thesis. Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden
60. Winter S, Brambach F (2011) Determination of a common forest life cycle assessment method for biodiversity evaluation. For Ecol Manage 262:2120-2132
61. Winter S, Möller GC (2008) Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation. For Ecol Manage 255:1251-1261
62. Winter S, Schumacher H, Möller G & Flade M (2002) Vom Reichtum des Alterns-Buchenaltholzbestände und ihr Beitrag zum Erhalt der Lebensgemeinschaft von Tieflandbuchenwäldern im nordostdeutschen Tiefland. Beitr Forstwirtsch Landsch ökol 36:(2):69-76
63. Winter S, Flade M, Schumacher H & Möller G (2003) Naturschutzstandards für die Bewirtschaftung von Buchenwäldern im nordostdeutschen Tiefland. Sachbericht des F + E-Vorhabens “Biologische Vielfalt und Forstwirtschaft”, Landesanstalt für Grossschutzgebiete Brandenburg (supplement volume)
64. Winter S, Flade M, Schumacher H et al (2005) The importance of near-natural stand structures for the biocoenosis of lowland beech forests. For Snow Landsc Res 79:127-144
65. Winter S, Vrška T, Begehold H (2013) Forest naturalness as a key to forest biodiversity preservation. In: Kraus D, Krumm F (eds) Integrate-integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. European Forest Institute, Freiburg, pp 52-63