Optimal Reaction Coordinate as a Biomarker for the Dynamics of Recovery from Kidney Transplant

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2014, Pages

  Krivov, Sergei V ^a   Fenton, Hayley ^a   Goldsmith, Paul J ^b   Prasad, Rajendra K ^b   Fisher, Julie ^a   Paci, Emanuele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSIS; DYNAMICS; GRAFTING (CHEMICAL); NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PATIENT MONITORING; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

CLINICAL CONDITIONS; COMPLEX PROCESSES; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTS; LONG-TERM OUTCOME; MEASURABLE PARAMETERS; NMR SPECTRUM; QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION; REACTION COORDINATES; REAL- TIME; TARGETED TREATMENT;

BIOMARKERS;

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE AGENT;

ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS; BLOOD SAMPLING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; DYNAMICS; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE TREATMENT; KIDNEY ARTERY STENOSIS; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LONG TERM CARE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PATIENT MONITORING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; BLOOD; KIDNEY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;

EID: 84903397358     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003685     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Chen R, Mias GI, Li-Pook-Than J, Jiang L, Lam HY, et al. (2012) Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical phenotypes. Cell 148: 1293-307.
2. Smilde AK, Westerhuis JA, Hoefsloot HC, Bijlsma S, Rubingh CM, et al. (2010) Dynamic metabolomic data analysis: a tutorial review. Metabolomics 6: 3-17.
3. Trygg J, Holmes E, Lundstedt T, (2007) Chemometrics in metabonomics. Journal of proteome research 6: 469-79.
4. Trygg J, Wold S, (2002) Orthogonal projections to latent structures (O-PLS). Journal of Chemometrics 16: 119-128.
5. Bylesjo M, Rantalainen M, Cloarec O, Nicholson JK, Holmes E, et al. (2006) OPLS discriminant analysis: combining the strengths of PLS-DA and SIMCA classification. Journal of Chemometrics 20: 341-351.
6. Schadt EE, (2009) Molecular networks as sensors and drivers of common human diseases. Nature 461: 218-23.
7. Krivov SV, (2010) Is protein folding sub-diffusive? PLOS Comp Biol 6: e1000921.
8. Krivov SV, (2011) The free energy landscape analysis of protein (FIP35) folding dynamics. J Phys Chem B 115: 12315-24.
9. Krivov SV, Karplus M, (2008) Diffusive reaction dynamics on invariant free energy profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 13841-6.
10. Krivov SV, (2011) Numerical construction of the p-fold (committor) reaction coordinate for a markov process. J Phys Chem B 115: 11382-8.
11. Du R, Pande VS, Grosberg AY, Tanaka T, Shakhnovich ES, (1998) On the transition coordinate for protein folding. J Chem Phys 108: 334-350.
12. Berezhkovskii A, Szabo A, (2004) Ensemble of transition states for two-state protein folding from the eigenvectors of rate matrices. J Chem Phys 121: 9186-7.
13. Krivov SV, (2011) Optimal dimensionality reduction of complex dynamics: the chess game as diffusion on a free-energy landscape. Phys Rev E 84: 011135.
14. Krivov SV, (2013) On reaction coordinate optimality. J Chem Theor Comput 9: 135-146.
15. Hummer G, (2003) From transition paths to transition states and rate coefficients. J Chem Phys 120: 516-523.
16. Chodera JD, Pande VS, (2011) Splitting probabilities as a test of reaction coordinate choice in single-molecule experiments. Phys Rev Let 107: 098102.
17. Peters B, Bolhuis PG, Mullen RG, Shea JE, (2013) Reaction coordinates, one-dimensional smoluchowski equations, and a test for dynamical self-consistency. J Chem Phys 138: 054106.
18. Stenlund H, Madsen R, Vivi A, Calderisi M, Lundstedt T, et al. (2009) Monitoring kidney-transplant patients using metabolomics and dynamic modeling. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 98: 45-50.
19. Zweig MH, Campbell G, (1993) Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clinical chemistry 4: 561-577.
20. Vaupel JW, (2010) Biodemography of human ageing. Nature 464: 536-42.
21. Haeno H, Gonen M, Davis MB, Herman JM, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, et al. (2012) Computational modeling of pancreatic cancer reveals kinetics of metastasis suggesting optimum treatment strategies. Cell 148: 362-75.
22. Sawyers CL, (2008) The cancer biomarker problem. Nature 452: 548-52.
23. Singh I, Rose N, (2009) Biomarkers in psychiatry. Nature 460: 202-7.
24. Krivov SV, (2013) Method to describe stochastic dynamics using an optimal coordinate. Phys Rev E 88: 062131.
25. Agresti A, Caffo B, (2000) Simple and effective confidence intervals for proportions and dierences of proportions result from adding two successes and two failures. The American Statistician 54: 280-288.
26. Rao F, Settanni G, Guarnera E, Caisch A, (2005) Estimation of protein folding probability from equilibrium simulations. J Chem Phys 122: 184901.
27. Cohn JN, (2004) Introduction to surrogate markers. Circulation 109: IV20-1.