Consumer-friendly reporting of in vitro fertilization outcomes

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 101, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Chetkowski, Ryszard J ^a  

^a Alta Bates Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER ADVOCACY; DELIVERY; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LETTER; LIVE BIRTH; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 84891558446     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.047     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. D.R. Meldrum Pregnancies and deliveries per fresh cycle are no longer adequate indicators of in vitro fertilization program quality: how should registries adapt? Fertil Steril 100 2013 620 621
2. A. Cabo, N. Garrido, J. Crespo, J. Remohi, and A. Pellicer Accumulation of oocytes: a new strategy for managing low-responder patients Reprod Biomed Online 24 2012 424 432
3. J.A. Paulos Innumeracy: mathematical illiteracy and its consequences 2001 Hill and Wang New York
4. H.W. Jones Jr., D. Jones, and P. Kolm Cryopreservation: a simplified method of evaluation Humanit Rep 12 1997 548 553 (Pubitemid 27156453)
5. J.E. Stern, T.F. Hickman, D. Kinzer, A.S. Penzias, G.D. Ball, and W.E. Gibbons Can the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System (SART CORS) be used to accurately report clinic total reproductive potential (TRP)? Fertil Steril 97 2012 886 889