The effect of cerium valence states at cerium oxide nanoparticle surfaces on cell proliferation

Biomaterials

Volumn 35, Issue 15, 2014, Pages 4441-4453

  Naganuma, Tamaki ^a   Traversa, Enrico ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Adhesion; Cell proliferation; Nanoparticles; Scaffold; Surface modification

Indexed keywords

ADHESION BEHAVIORS; BIOMATERIAL SURFACES; CATALYTIC ABILITY; CELL-MATERIAL INTERACTION; CERIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS (HMSCS); OSTEOBLAST-LIKE CELLS; THERAPEUTIC APPLICATION;

ADHESION; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMATERIALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; NANOPARTICLES; OXIDES; SCAFFOLDS; STEM CELLS; SURFACE TREATMENT; SURFACES;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

BIOMATERIAL; CERIUM OXIDE; CERIUM OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; METAL; NANOPARTICLE; POLYLACTIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CATALYSIS; CELL ADHESION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SPREADING; CELL STRUCTURE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL; OSTEOBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ADHESION; CELL PROLIFERATION; NANOPARTICLES; SCAFFOLD; SURFACE MODIFICATION;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CERIUM; HUMANS; MESENCHYMAL STROMAL CELLS; NANOPARTICLES; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84903362342     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.01.074     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arima Y., Iwata H. Effect of wettability and surface functional groups on protein adsorption and cell adhesion using well-defined mixed self-assembled monolayers. Biomaterials 2007, 28:3074-3082.
2. Keselowsky B.G., Collard D.M., García A.J. Integrin binding specificity regulates biomaterial surface chemistry effects on cell differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:5953-5957.
3. Benoit D.S., Schwartz M.P., Durney A.R., Anseth K.S. Small functional groups for controlled differentiation of hydrogel-encapsulated human mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Mater 2008, 7:816-823.
4. Nel A.E., Mädler L., Velegol D., Xia T., Hoek E.M., Somasundaran P., et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nat Mater 2009, 8:543-557.
5. 2 nanoparticles in PLGA scaffolds with improved bioactivity for regenerative medicine. Adv Funct Mater 2010, 20:1617-1624.
6. Karakoti A., Singh S., Dowding J.M., Seal S., Self W.T. Redox-active radical scavenging nanomaterials. Chem Soc Rev 2010, 39:4422-4432.
7. Celardo I., Pedersen J.Z., Traversa E., Ghibelli L. Pharmacological potential of cerium oxide nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2011, 3:1411-1420.
8. Chen J., Patil S., Seal S., McGinnis J.F. Rare earth nanoparticles prevent retinal degeneration induced by intracellular peroxides. Nat Nanotechnol 2006, 1:142-150.
9. 3+ ions determine redox-dependent anti-apoptotic effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2011, 5:4537-4549.
10. Korsvik C., Patil S., Seal S., Self W.T. Superoxide dismutase mimetic properties exhibited by vacancy engineered ceria nanoparticles. Chem Commun 2007, 10:1056-1058.
11. Heckert E.G., Karakoti A.S., Seal S., Self W.T. The role of cerium redox state in the SOD mimetic activity of nanoceria. Biomaterials 2008, 29:2705-2709.
12. Pirmohamed T., Dowding J.M., Singh S., Wasserman B., Heckert E., Karakoti A.S., et al. Nanoceria exhibit redox state-dependent catalase mimetic activity. Chem Commun 2010, 46:2736-2738.
13. Pagliari F., Mandoli C., Forte G., Magnani E., Pagliari S., Nardone G., et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect cardiac progenitor cells from oxidative stress. ACS Nano 2012, 6:3767-3775.
14. 3+ valence state in cerium oxide nanoparticle layers. Nanoscale 2012, 4:4950-4953.
15. Friedrich J., Helenius J., Muller D.J. Quantifying cellular adhesion to extracellular matrix components by single-cell force spectroscopy. Nat Protoc 2010, 5:1355-1361.
16. Marrocchelli D., Bishop S.R., Tuller H.L., Yildiz B. Understanding chemical expansion in non-stoichiometric oxides: ceria and zirconia case studies. Adv Funct Mater 2012, 22:1958-1965.
17. 2 nanoparticles: size-dependent geometrical and electronic structure. JPhys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces 2012, 116:7312-7317.
18. 2 nanoparticles using two aquatic microorganisms. Toxicol Sci 2011, 119:135-145.
19. Vincent A., Inerbaev T.M., Babu S., Karakoti A.S., Self W.T., Masunov A.E., et al. Tuning hydrated nanoceria surfaces: experimental/theoretical investigations of ion exchange and implications in organic and inorganic interactions. Langmuir 2010, 26:7188-7198.
20. Patil S., Sandberg A., Heckert E., Self W., Seal S. Protein adsorption and cellular uptake of cerium oxide nanoparticles as a function of zeta potential. Biomaterials 2007, 28:4600-4607.
21. Das S., Singh S., Dowding J.M., Oommen S., Kumar A., Sayle T.X.T., et al. The induction of angiogenesis by cerium oxide nanoparticles through the modulation of oxygen in intracellular environments. Biomaterials 2012, 22:7746-7755.
22. Limbach L.K., Li Y., Grass R.N., Brunner T.J., Hintermann M.A., Muller M., et al. Oxide nanoparticle uptake in human lung fibroblasts: effects of particle size, agglomeration, and diffusion at low concentrations. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39:9370-9376.
23. Rowlands A.S., George P.A., Cooper-White J.J. Directing osteogenic and myogenic differentiation of MSCs: interplay of stiffness and adhesive ligand presentation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2008, 295:C1037-C1044.
24. Winer J.P., Janmey P.A., McCormick M.E., Funaki M. Bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells become quiescent on soft substrates but remain responsive to chemical or mechanical stimuli. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15:147-154.
25. Seo J.H., Matsuno R., Takai M., Ishihara K. Cell adhesion on phase-separated surface of block copolymer composed of poly-(2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine) and poly(dimethylsiloxane). Biomaterials 2009, 30:5330-5340.
26. Wilhelm C., Billotey C., Roger J., Pons J.N., Bacri J.C., Gazeau F. Intracellular uptake of anionic superparamagnetic nanoparticles as a function of their surface coating. Biomaterials 2003, 24:1001-1011.
27. Su G., Zhou H., Mu Q., Zhang Y., Li L., Jiao P., et al. Effective surface charge density determines the electrostatic attraction between nanoparticles and cells. JPhys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces 2012, 116:4993-4998.
28. Vincent A., Babu S., Heckert E., Dowding J., Hirst S.M., Inerbaev T.M., et al. Protonated nanoparticle surface governing ligand tethering and cellular targeting. ACS Nano 2009, 3:1203-1211.
29. Singh S., Dosani T., Karakoti A.S., Kumar A., Seal S., Self W.T. Aphosphate-dependent shift in redox state of cerium oxide nanoparticles and its effects on catalytic properties. Biomaterials 2011, 32:6745-6753.
30. Zhu X., Chen J., Scheideler L., Reichl R., Geis-Gerstorfer J. Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterials 2004, 25:4087-4103.
31. Dadsetan M., Giuliani M., Wanivenhaus F., Runge M.B., Charlesworth J.E., Yaszemski M.J. Incorporation of phosphate group modulates bone cell attachment and differentiation on oligo (polyethylene glycol) fumarate hydrogel. Acta Biomater 2012, 8:1430-1439.