Human ability in identification of location and pulse number for electrocutaneous stimulation applied on the forearm

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Geng, Bo ^a   Jensen, Winnie ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; ELECTROCUTANEOUS STIMULATION; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; FINGER; FOREARM; HUMAN; INDEX FINGER; MALE; MIDDLE FINGER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE RATE; THUMB; TRAINING; ATTENTION; INNERVATION; LIMB PROSTHESIS; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; SENSORY FEEDBACK;

ADULT; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ATTENTION; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMANS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 84903315724     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-97     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. A comparison of alternative means of providing sensory feedback on upper limb prostheses. Shannon GF, Med Biol Eng 1976 14 3 289 294 10.1007/BF02478123 940388
2. Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering. Szeto A, Saunders FA, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1982 BME-29 4 300 308 (Pubitemid 12499739)
3. Relationship between pulse rate and pulse width for a constant-intensity level of electrocutaneous stimulation. Szeto AYJ, Ann Biomed Eng 1985 13 5 373 383 10.1007/BF02407767 4073624 (Pubitemid 16218128)
4. Sensory feedback for powered limb prostheses. Rohland TA, Med Biol Eng 1975 13 2 300 301 10.1007/BF02477743 1195823
5. Artificial touch in a hand-prosthesis. Beeker TW, During J, den Hertog A, Med Biol Eng 1967 5 1 47 49 10.1007/BF02478841 6037625
6. The importance of information feedback in prostheses for the upper limbs. Schmidl H, Prosthet Orthot Int 1977 1 1 21 24 615983
7. Sensory-feedback system compatible with myoelectric control. Scott RN, Caldwell RR, Brittain RH, Cameron AB, Dunfield VA, Med Biol Eng Comput 1980 18 1 65 69 10.1007/BF02442481 7382591 (Pubitemid 10210706)
8. Design and evaluation of a low-cost force feedback system for myoelectric prosthetic hands. Pylatiuk C, Kargov A, Schulz S, J Prosthet Orthot 2006 18 2 57 61 10.1097/00008526-200604000-00007 (Pubitemid 44510417)
9. A myoelectrically-controlled prosthesis with sensory feedback. Shannon GF, Med Biol Eng Comput 1979 17 1 73 80 10.1007/BF02440956 312386 (Pubitemid 9108396)
10. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, in 't Veld RH, Hermens H, Stramigioli S, Rietman H, Veltink P, Misra S, J Rehabil Res Dev 2011 48 6 719 737 10.1682/JRRD.2010.08.0161 21938658
11. HyVE-hybrid vibro-electrotactile stimulation-is an efficient approach to multi-channel sensory feedback. D'Alonzo M, Dosen S, Cipriani C, Farina D, IEEE Trans Haptics in press
12. Vibro-and electrotactile user feedback on hand opening for myoelectric forearm prostheses. Witteveen HJ, Droog EA, Rietman JS, Veltink PH, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012 59 8 2219 2226 22645262
13. The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control. Saunders I, Vijayakumar S, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 60 10.1186/1743-0003-8-60 22032545
14. Evaluation of sensation evoked by electrocutaneous stimulation on forearm in nondisabled subjects. Geng B, Yoshida K, Petrini L, Jensen W, J Rehabil Res Dev 2012 49 2 297 308 10.1682/JRRD.2010.09.0187 22773530
15. Perceived magnitude of multiple electrocutaneous pulses. Sachs RM, Miller JD, Grant KW, Percept Psychophys 1980 28 3 255 262 10.3758/BF03204383 7433004
16. Comparison of codes for sensory feedback using electrocutaneous tracking. Szeto AYJ, Lyman J, Ann Biomed Eng 1977 5 4 367 383 10.1007/BF02367316 607824 (Pubitemid 8284437)
17. Pattern identification on a fingertipscanned electrotactile display. Kaczmarek KA, Tyler ME, Bach-y-Rita P, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: 30 Oct-2 Nov 1997 Chicago: IEEE 1997 1694 1696
18. Electrocutaneous pulse rate and pulse width psychometric functions for sensory communications. Szeto AYJ, Lyman J, Prior RE, Hum Factors 1979 21 2 241 249 489023 (Pubitemid 9226794)
19. Impacts of selected stimulation patterns on the perception threshold in electrocutaneous stimulation. Geng B, Yoshida K, Jensen W, J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011 8 1 10.1186/1743-0003-8-1 21226898
20. Tactile displays: Guidance for their design and application. Jones LA, Sarter NB, Hum Factors 2008 50 1 90 111 10.1518/001872008X250638 18354974 (Pubitemid 351346107)
21. Electrotactile two point discrimination as a function of frequency, body site, laterality, and stimulation codes. Solomonow M, Lyman J, Freedy A, Ann Biomed Eng 1977 5 1 47 60 10.1007/BF02409338 851263 (Pubitemid 8079944)
22. Electrotactile two point discrimination as a function of frequency, pulse width and pulse time delay. Solomonow M, Raplee L, Lyman J, Ann Biomed Eng 1978 6 2 117 125 10.1007/BF02584538 717863 (Pubitemid 9031951)
23. A miniature vibrotactile sensory substitution device for multifingered hand prosthetics. Cipriani C, D'Alonzo M, Carrozza MC, IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2012 59 2 400 408 22042125
24. The optimal controller delay for myoelectric prostheses. Farrell TR, Weir RF, IEEE Trans Neur Sys Reh 2007 15 1 111 118