Empirical mode decomposition of pressure signal for health condition monitoring in waterjet cutting

International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Volumn 72, Issue 1-4, 2014, Pages 347-364

  Grasso, M ^a   Pennacchi, P ^a   Colosimo, B M ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Condition monitoring; Empirical mode decomposition; Principal component analysis; Waterjet cutting

Indexed keywords

FAULT DETECTION; JETS; MIXING; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PUMPS; SIGNAL DETECTION;

CONDITION BASED MAINTENANCE; CONTINUOUS MONITORING; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION; FLEXIBLE TECHNOLOGIES; LOW FREQUENCY PRESSURE; PRESSURE CONDITIONS; QUALITY MONITORING; WATERJET CUTTING;

CONDITION MONITORING;

EID: 84903314806     PISSN: 02683768     EISSN: 14333015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-014-5671-4     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Kovacevic R, Hashish M, Mohan R, Ramulu M, Kim TJ, Geskin ES (1997) State of the art of research and development in abrasive waterjet machining. J Manuf Sci Eng 119(4):776-785
2. Hashemian HM (2011) State-of-The-art predictive maintenance techniques. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 60(1):226-236
3. Perzel V, Hreha P, Hloch S, Tozan H, Valicek J (2012) Vibration emission as a potential source of information for abrasive waterjet quality process control. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61(1-4):285-294
4. Krenicky T, Miroslav R (2012) Monitoring of vibrations in the technology of AWJ. Key Eng Mater 96:229-234
5. Axinte DA, Kong MC (2009) An integrated monitoring method to supervise waterjet machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58:303-306
6. Rabani A, Marinescu I, Axinte D (2012) Acoustic emission energy transfer rate: a method for monitoring abrasive waterjet milling. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 61:80-89
7. Choi GS, Choi GH (1997) Process analysis and monitoring in abrasive waterjet machining of alumina ceramics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 37(3):295-307
8. Wang W, Wang M, Abrasive Waterjet Process Control Overview, 2011 International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet), April 16-18, 2011, Xianning, China
9. Mohan RS, Real-time monitoring of AWJ nozzle wear using artificial neural network, Transactions of the North American Manufacturing Research Institute of SME 1994, Vol. 22, May 25-27, 1994, Evanston, IL, USA
10. Jurisevic B, Brissaud D, Junkar M (2004) Monitoring of abrasive water jet (AWJ) cutting using sound detection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:733-737
11. Annoni M, Cristaldi L, Lazzaroni M (2008) Measurements, analysis and interpretation of the signals from a high-pressure waterjet pump. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(1):34-47
12. Annoni M, Cristaldi L, Lazzaroni M, Ferrari S (2009) Nozzles classification in a high-pressure water jet system. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 58(10):3739-3745
13. Annoni M, Cristaldi L, Faifer M, Electric Signature Analysis for High Pressure Waterjet Pumps Fault Classification, 16th IMEKO TC4 Symposium - Exploring New Frontiers of Instrumentation and Methods for Electrical and Electronic Measurements, Sept. 22-24, 2008, Florence, Italy
14. Xia W, Zhao D, Guo J, Chen B, Research on the abrasive water-jet cutting machine information fusion fault diagnosis system based on fuzzy neural network, International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computer Science (ICBECS), April 23-25, 2010, Wuhan, China
15. Grasso M, Goletti M, Annoni M, Colosimo BM (2013) A new approach for online health assessment of abrasive waterjet systems. Int J Abras Technol 6(2):158-181
16. Colosimo BM, Pacella M (2007) On the use of principal component analysis to identify systematic patterns in roundness profiles. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(6):707-725
17. Rao BKN (1996) Handbook of condition monitoring. Elsevier
18. Beebe RS (2004) Predictive maintenance of pumps using condition monitoring. Elsevier
19. Gao Y, Zhang Q, Kong X (2003) Wavelet-based pressure analysis for hydraulic pump health diagnosis. Transactions of the ASAE - American Society of Agricultural Engineers 46(4):969-976
20. Kaewkongka T, Au YHJ, Rakowski RT, Jones BE (2003) A comparative study of short time Fourier transform and continuous wavelet transform for bearing condition monitoring. Int J COMADEM 6(1):41-48
21. Peng ZK, Chu FL (2004) Application of the wavelet transform in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnostics: a review with bibliography. Mech Syst Signal Process 18(2):199-221
22. Li H, Zheng H, Tang L (2006) Wigner-Ville distribution based on EMD for faults diagnosis of bearings, fuzzy systems and knowledge discover. Lecture Notes in Computer Sciences 4223:803-812
23. Kothamasu R, Huang SH, VerDuin WH (2006) System health monitoring and prognostics - a review of current paradigms and practices. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:1012-1024
24. Feng Z, Liang M, Chu F (2013) Recent advances in time-frequency analysis methods for machinery fault diagnosis: a review with application examples. Mech Syst Signal Process 38:165-205
25. Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, Wu ML, Shih HH et al (1998) The empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc London Ser A 454:903-95
26. Flandrin P, Rilling G, Goncalves P (2004) Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank. IEEE Sig Process Lett 11(2):112-114
27. Peng ZK, Tse PW, Chu FL (2005) A comparison study of improved Hilbert-Huang transform and wavelet transform: application to fault diagnosis for rolling bearing. Mech Syst Signal Process 19:974-988
28. Ricci R, Pennacchi P (2011) Diagnostics of gear faults based on EMD and automatic selection of intrinsic mode functions. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(3):821-838
29. Yu D, Cheng J, Yang Y (2005) Application of EMD method and Hilbert spectrum to the fault diagnosis of roller bearings. Mech Syst Signal Process 19:259-270
30. Pines D, Salvino L (2006) Structural health monitoring using empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert phase. J Sound Vib 294:97-124
31. Liang H, Lin Q-H, Chen JDZ (2005) Application of the empirical mode decomposition to the analysis of the esophageal manometric data in gastroesophageal reflux disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(10):1692-1701
32. Lu Z, Smith JS, Wu QHH, Fitch JE, Empirical mode decomposition for power quality monitoring, IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition: Asia and Pacific, 2005
33. Goharrizi AY, Sepehri N (2012) Internal leakage detection in hydraulic actuators using empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectrum. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation & Measurement 61(2):368-378
34. Wu Q, Riemenschneider SD (2010) Boundary extension and stop criteria for empirical mode decomposition. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis 2(2):157-169
35. Rilling G, Flandrin P, Goncalves P, On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms. IEEE-EURASIP Workshop on Nonlinear Signal and Image Processing NSIP-03, Grado (Italy), 2003
36. Wu Z, Huang NE (2009) Ensemble empirical mode decomposition: a noise assisted data analysis method. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis 1(1):1-41
37. Zvokelj M, Zupan S, Prebil I (2010) Multivariate and multiscale monitoring of large-size low speed bearings using ensemble empirical mode decomposition method combined with principal component analysis. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:1049-1067
38. Zvokelj M, Zupan S, Prebil I (2011) Non-linear multivariate and multiscale monitoring and signal denoising strategy using kernel principal component analysis combined with ensemble empirical mode decomposition method. Mech Syst Signal Process 25(7):2631-2653
39. Zhang J, Yan R, Gao RX, Feng Z (2010) Performance enhancement of ensemble empirical mode decomposition. Mech Syst Signal Process 24:2104-2123
40. Gao Q, Duan C, Fan H, Meng Q (2008) Rotating machine fault diagnosis using empirical mode decomposition. Mech Syst Signal Process 22:1072-1081
41. Flandrin P, Goncalves P, Rilling G, Detrending and denoising with empirical mode decomposition, XII European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO), September 6-10, Vienna, Austria, 2004
42. Loutridis SJ (2004) Damage detection in gear systems using empirical mode decomposition. Eng Struct 26:1833-1841
43. Boutana D, Benidir M, Barkat B, On the selection of the intrinsic mode function in EMD method: application on heart sound signal, 3rd International Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL), 2010, Rome, Italy
44. Ayenu-Prah A, Attoh-Okine N (2010) A criterion for selecting relevant intrinsic mode functions in empirical mode decomposition. Advances in Adaptive Data Analysis 2(1):1-24
45. Bu N, Ueno N, Fukuda O, Monitoring of respiration and heartbeat during sleep using a flexible piezoelectric film sensor and empirical mode decomposition, Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, Lyon (France), 2007
46. Sullivan JH, Jones LA (2002) A self-starting control for multivariate individual observations. Technometrics 44(1):24-33
47. Jolliffe IT, Principal component analysis, springer series in statistics, 2nd Edition, 2002
48. Stepanic P, Latinovic IV, Djurovic Z (2009) A new approach to detection of defects in rolling element bearings based on statistical pattern recognition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:91-100
49. Bersimis S, Psarakis S, Panaretos J (2006) Multivariate statistical process control charts: an overview. Quality & Reliability Engineering International 23(5):517-543
50. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Wang K (2013) Intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis approach for rotating machinery integrating wavelet transform, principal component analysis, and artificial neural networks, international journal of advanced manufacturing technology. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology 68:763-773
51. Pinheiro E, Postolache O, Girao P (2012) Empirical mode decomposition and principal component analysis implementation in processing non-invasive cardiovascular signals. Measurements 45:175-181
52. Lee T, Ouarda TBMJ (2012) An EMD and PCA hybrid approach for separating noise from signal, and signal in climate change detection. Int J Climatol 32:624-634
53. Valle S, Li W, Qin SJ (1999) Selection of the number of principal components: the variance of reconstruction error criterion with a comparison to other methods. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 38:4389-4401
54. Wold S, Cross-validatory estimation of the number of components in factor and principal components models, Technometrics, Vol. 20, no. 4, no. 1, pp. 397-405, 1978
55. Nomikos P, MacGregor JF (1995) Multivariate SPC charts for monitoring batch processes. Technometrics 37(1):41-59
56. Montgomery DC, Introduction to statistical quality control, Wiley, Ed. 6, April 2008
57. Goletti M, Grasso M, Annoni M, Colosimo BM (2013) Condition monitoring of an ultra high pressure intensifier for waterjet cutting machines. Procedia CIRP 12:193-198
58. Sclove SL (1987) Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika 52(3):333-343
59. Bakshi BR (1998) Multiscale PCA with application to multivariate statistical process monitoring. AIChE J 4(7):1596-1610
60. Lu N, Wang F, Gao F (2003) Combination method of principal component and wavelet analysis for multivariate process monitoring and fault diagnosis. Ind Eng Chem Res 42:4198-4207
61. Zhou S, Sun B, Shi J (2006) An SPC monitoring system for cycle-based waveform signals using haar transform. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 3(1):60-72
62. Coifman RR, Wickerhauser MV (1992) Entropy-based algorithms for best basis selection. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 38(2):713-718