Challenges and opportunities of panel designs

The Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 19-33

  Eveland, William P ^a   Morey, Alyssa C ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84903165554     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203938669     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Bartels, L. M. (1993). Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87, 267–285.
2. Brody, R. A. (1991). Assessing the president: The media, elite opinion, and public support. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
3. Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
4. Chang, L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2003). Measuring the frequency of regular behaviors: Comparing the “typical week” to the “past week.” Sociological Methodology, 33, 55–80.
5. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.
6. Cronbach, L. J. (1960). Essentials of psychological testing(2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers.
7. Edwards, G. C., & Swenson, T. (1997). Who rallies? The anatomy of a rally event. Journal of Politics, 59, 200–212.
8. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Hayes, A. F., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2005a). Observations on estimation of communication effects on political knowledge and a test of intracommunication mediation. Political Communication, 22, 505–509.
9. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Hayes, A. F., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2005b). Understanding the relationship between communication and political knowledge: A model comparison approach using panel data. Political Communication, 22, 423–446.
10. Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Thomson, T. (2006). Is it talking, thinking, or both? A lagged dependent variable model of discussion effects on political knowledge. Journal of Communication, 56, 523–542.
11. Eveland, W. P., Jr., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing, and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30, 359–386.
12. Fan, D. P. (1988). Predictions of public opinion from the mass media: Computer content analysis and mathematical modeling. New York: Greenwood Press.
13. Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Foster, E. M., & Fang, G. Y. (2004). Alternative methods for handling attrition: An illustration using data from the Fast Track Evaluation. Evaluation Review, 28, 434–464.
15. Henry, K. L., & Slater, M. D. (2008). Assessing change and intraindividual variation: Longitudinal multilevel and structural equation modeling. In A. F. Hayes, M. D. Slater, & L. B. Snyder (Eds.), The Sage sourcebook of advanced data analysis methods for communication research(pp. 55–87). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
16. Holbert, R. L. (2005). Intramedia mediation: The cumulative and complementary effects of news media use. Political Communication, 22, 447–461.
17. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
19. Krosnick, J. A., & Brannon, L. A. (1993). The impact of the Gulf War on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Multidimensional effects of political involvement. American Political Science Review, 87, 963–975.
20. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Lee, S. (2006). An evaluation of nonresponse and coverage errors in a prerecruited probability Web panel survey. Social Science Computer Review, 24, 460–475.
22. Moore, D. W. (1987). Political campaigns and the knowledge-gap hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 186–200.
23. Mueller, J. (1973). War, presidents and public opinion. New York: Wiley.
24. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1997). Priming and media impact on the evaluations of the president’s performance. Communication Research, 24, 3–30.
25. Patterson, T. E. (2002). The vanishing voter: Public involvement in an age of uncertainty. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
26. Ridout, T. N., Shah, D. V., Goldstein, K. M., & Franz, M. M. (2004). Evaluating measures of campaign advertising exposure on political learning. Political Behavior, 26, 201–225.
27. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Carpentier, F. R. D. (2002). Media priming: A synthesis. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research(2nd ed., pp. 97–120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17, 281–303.
30. Srull, T. K., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672.
31. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159–170.
32. Trivellato, U. (1999). Issues in the design and analysis of panel studies: A cursory review. Quality & Quantity, 33, 339–352.
33. Watt, J. H., Mazza, M., & Snyder, L. (1993). Agenda-setting effects of television news coverage and the effects decay curve. Communication Research, 20, 408–435.