Clinical management of endometrial receptivity

Seminars in Reproductive Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 410-414

  Blesa, David ^a   Ruiz Alonso, María ^a   Simón, Carlos ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO VALENCIANO DE INFERTILIDAD   (Spain)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

embryo transfer; endometrial receptivity; implantation window; personalized medicine

Indexed keywords

CELL ADHESION MOLECULE; CHEMOKINE; CYTOKINE; GAP JUNCTION PROTEIN; GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR; INTERMEDIATE FILAMENT PROTEIN; MATRIX METALLOPROTEINASE; PEPTIDE HORMONE; PROSTAGLANDIN; STEROID HORMONE; WNT PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIAL RECEPTIVITY ARRAY TEST; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HISTORY OF MEDICINE; HOMEOBOX; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; REPRODUCTIVE PROCEDURE; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; NIDATION; OVULATION INDUCTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIUM; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; OVULATION INDUCTION;

EID: 84903144098     PISSN: 15268004     EISSN: 15264564     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1376360     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beier H. M., Beier-Hellwig K. Molecular and cellular aspects of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod Update: 1998; 4 5 448 458 (Pubitemid 29041455)
2. Diedrich K., Fauser B. C., Devroey P., Griesinger G.; Evian Annual Reproduction (EVAR) Workshop Group. The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update: 2007; 13 4 365 377 (Pubitemid 47062829)
3. Bulun S. E., Adashi E. Y. The physiology and pathology of the female reproductive axis. In: Kronenberg H. M., Melmed S., Polonsky K. S., Larsen P. R., eds. Williams Textbook of Endocrinology, 11th ed. Philadelphia, PA Elsevier: 2009; 549 622
4. Hawkins S. M., Matzuk M. M. The menstrual cycle: basic biology. Ann N Y Acad Sci: 2008; 1135 10 18 (Pubitemid 351862132)
5. Wilcox A. J., Baird D. D., Weinberg C. R. Time of implantation of the conceptus and loss of pregnancy. N Engl J Med: 1999; 340 23 1796 1799 (Pubitemid 29266403)
6. Lessey B. A. Assessment of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril: 2011; 96 3 522 529
7. Navot D., Scott R. T., Droesch K., Veeck L. L., Liu H. C., Rosenwaks Z. The window of embryo transfer and the efficiency of human conception in vitro. Fertil Steril: 1991; 55 1 114 118
8. Lenton E. A., Neal L. M., Sulaiman R. Plasma concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin from the time of implantation until the second week of pregnancy. Fertil Steril: 1982; 37 6 773 778 (Pubitemid 12078014)
9. Makker A., Singh M. M. Endometrial receptivity: clinical assessment in relation to fertility, infertility, and antifertility. Med Res Rev: 2006; 26 6 699 746 (Pubitemid 44735551)
10. Noyes R. W., Hertig A. T., Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril: 1950; 1 3 25
11. Noyes R. W., Haman J. O. Accuracy of endometrial dating; correlation of endometrial dating with basal body temperature and menses. Fertil Steril: 1953; 4 6 504 517
12. Murray M. J., Meyer W. R., Zaino R. J., et al. A critical analysis of the accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic endometrial dating in fertile women. Fertil Steril: 2004; 81 5 1333 1343 (Pubitemid 38609319)
13. Coutifaris C., Myers E. R., Guzick D. S., et al. NICHD National Cooperative Reproductive Medicine Network. Histological dating of timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status. Fertil Steril: 2004; 82 5 1264 1272 (Pubitemid 39469442)
14. Koot Y. EM, Teklenburg G., Salker M. S., Brosens J. J., Macklon N. S. Molecular aspects of implantation failure. Biochim Biophys Acta: 2012; 1822 12 1943 1950
15. Lessey B. A., Castelbaum A. J., Sawin S. W., Sun J. Integrins as markers of uterine receptivity in women with primary unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril: 1995; 63 3 535 542
16. Dubowy R. L., Feinberg R. F., Keefe D. L., et al. Improved endometrial assessment using cyclin E and p27. Fertil Steril: 2003; 80 1 146 156 (Pubitemid 36808871)
17. Aghajanova L., Hamilton A. E., Giudice L. C. Uterine receptivity to human embryonic implantation: histology, biomarkers, and transcriptomics. Semin Cell Dev Biol: 2008; 19 2 204 211 (Pubitemid 351258374)
18. Carson D. D., Lagow E., Thathiah A., et al. Changes in gene expression during the early to mid-luteal (receptive phase) transition in human endometrium detected by high-density microarray screening. Mol Hum Reprod: 2002; 8 9 871 879 (Pubitemid 35012476)
19. Ruiz-Alonso M., Blesa D., Simón C. The genomics of the human endometrium. Biochim Biophys Acta: 2012; 1822 12 1931 1942
20. Riesewijk A., Martín J., van Os R., et al. Gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity on days LH+2 versus LH+7 by microarray technology. Mol Hum Reprod: 2003; 9 5 253 264 (Pubitemid 36748828)
21. Horcajadas J. A., Riesewijk A., Domínguez F., Cervero A., Pellicer A., Simón C. Determinants of endometrial receptivity. Ann N Y Acad Sci: 2004; 1034 166 175 (Pubitemid 40362359)
22. Horcajadas J. A., Riesewijk A., Martín J., et al. Global gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity. J Reprod Immunol: 2004; 63 1 41 49 (Pubitemid 38988253)
23. Horcajadas J. A., Riesewijk A., Polman J., et al. Effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in IVF on endometrial gene expression profiles. Mol Hum Reprod: 2005; 11 3 195 205 (Pubitemid 40662753)
24. Horcajadas J. A., Sharkey A. M., Catalano R. D., et al. Effect of an intrauterine device on the gene expression profile of the endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab: 2006; 91 8 3199 3207 (Pubitemid 44271776)
25. Horcajadas J. A., Mínguez P., Dopazo J., et al. Controlled ovarian stimulation induces a functional genomic delay of the endometrium with potential clinical implications. J Clin Endocrinol Metab: 2008; 93 11 4500 4510 (Pubitemid 352789553)
26. Altmäe S., Martínez-Conejero J. A., Salumets A., Simón C., Horcajadas J. A., Stavreus-Evers A. Endometrial gene expression analysis at the time of embryo implantation in women with unexplained infertility. Mol Hum Reprod: 2010; 16 3 178 187
27. Díaz-Gimeno P., Horcajadas J. A., Martínez-Conejero J. A., et al. A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril: 2011; 95 1 50 60, e1-e15
28. Díaz-Gimeno P., Ruiz-Alonso M., Blesa D., et al. The accuracy and reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril: 2013; 99 2 508 517
29. Ruiz-Alonso M., Blesa D., Díaz-Gimeno P., et al. The endometrial receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril: 2013; 100 3 818 824
30. Hoozemans D. A., Schats R., Lambalk C. B., Homburg R., Hompes P. G. Human embryo implantation: current knowledge and clinical implications in assisted reproductive technology. Reprod Biomed Online: 2004; 9 6 692 715 (Pubitemid 40028888)
31. Martínez-Conejero J. A., Simón C., Pellicer A., Horcajadas J. A. Is ovarian stimulation detrimental to the endometrium? Reprod Biomed Online: 2007; 15 1 45 50
32. Direito A., Bailly S., Mariani A., Ecochard R. Relationships between the luteinizing hormone surge and other characteristics of the menstrual cycle in normally ovulating women. Fertil Steril: 2013; 99 1 279 285